• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Some Characteristics of Islamic ArtAuthor(s): Edward H. MaddenSource:
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
Vol. 33, No. 4 (Summer, 1975), pp. 423-430Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The American Society for AestheticsStable URL:
Accessed: 21/06/2009 10:27
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unlessyou have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and youmay use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black .Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with thescholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform thatpromotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
 Blackwell Publishing
and
The American Society for Aesthetics
are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,preserve and extend access to
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
http://www.jstor.org
 
EDWARDH. MADDEN
Some
Characteristics
f
Islamic
Art
WESTERNART HISTORIANS
have
shown
much interestinIslamicart,thoughingen-eraltheyhave remainedcontent withdatingartifactsandascribingartobjectsto variousschoolsand traditions.Suchwork issurelyimportant,but itgiveslittle ornoinsightintowhatmakesIslamicart Islamic. It leavesopaquethemeaningsof these artifactsasexpressionsofacommunityin whichreligionand artareintimately joined.TitusBurck-hardtisthehappyexceptionwho,inadditionto historicalexpertise,has madeimportantcontributionsto thebeginningsof an aes-theticsof Islamicart.'UntilrecentlyMuslim writersalso havebeenof littlehelptothe interested Westerner.Knowingthe intimatewaythat his artex-pressesIslamiccommitments,hesupposedithopelessto makeanyoneoutside the Islamiccommunitygenuinelyunderstandandappre-ciatethesymbolismof Islamic art.In recentyears,however,theyhavechangedtheir tackandaretryingto make cleartoanyonewithsufficientimaginationandsympathythe mainthrustofIslamicartandtherebytoopentothe Westernmind new avenuesofaestheticappreciation.2Thispaperis anefforttowardachievingthat samegoal.Theplanofprocedurewillbethis:1)toapplybrieflytheconceptof traditionalorreligiousart-madefamiliarbytheexcellentwritingsof AnandaCoomaraswamy,RendGuenon,andTitusBurckhardt-specificallytotheIslamiccontext;2)todistinguishcare-fullyandanalyzeinsomedetail the constit-uentelementsof the classicalSunni Islamic
EDWARDMADDEN
is
professor
of
philosophyat theUJni-vetrsityfBuffalo.
tradition andtocontrastthemfrequentlywithChristianityasan aidto theWesterner'sunderstanding;3)toinvestigatcvarious ele-ments ofIslamicdecorative art and showhowtheyexpressandsymbolizethe constituentelementsofSunnicommitment;and4)topointoutvariouspitfallsandmistakes insymbolicinterpretationssothatthey maybeavoidedinfuture discussions.I.Islamic art istheexpressionof awhole cul-ture,intimatelyintertwinedwithreligious,theological,andlegalcommitments. It isawayofexpressingandcelebratingthedefiningideologyof acommunity.It isalwayssocialandtraditional,neveridiosyncraticorwhollyself-expressive.The search fornewartisticpatternsisnevergreat;therepetition-or,better,improvementandrefinement-ofclassic forms isalwaysprized,andskillin itconstitutes theessenceofart,whetheritbeliterary,architectural,ordecorative.Thethoughtthathe wasexpressinghimselfwouldseemidiosyncraticto a Muslimartist.SinceMuslimartistryiscommunalandtraditionalratherthanself-expressive,it isnever datedorfaddish thewaycontemporaryWestern artis.Noveltyfor itsown sakerather than a newwayofexpressingoldtruth istotallyforeigntoanytraditionalreligious community.Islamic artmakesnoessential distinctionbetween fine arts and crafts. FortheMuslim,art is skill inmakingthingswellwhether thethingbeapoem,apainting,arug,amihrab,or amosque.Thepoet,thepainter,theweaver,thecarver,thecarpenter,thearchi-tect,and the mason are all artistsand their
 
424productsworks ofart;theyaregoodartistsand artifactsdepending uponwhether therequiredskill wasforthcoming.InparallelfashionMuslimsdonotdistinguishbetweenfine artsand minorarts.Thewell-propor-tioned and well-carvedmihrabisjustasmucha workofart as thewhole well-donemosque;theexpertlywovenrugas much awork of artas thewell-designedand executedmadrasahorpalace.Moreover,inIslamicartthereis nodistinction betweenfineartsand decorativearts. Decorationis fundamental to allart;it isneversomethingaddedas aflourish.3Theinfinitepattern,thearabesque,stylizedkuficandnakshscript,andstylizedfloralandvegetal patternsall haveintegralsymbolicfunctions wherevertheyoccur,betheywroughtincoloredtilesonthe domeof amosque,cutor moldedintothe stoneorstuccowallsofamosque,carvedinto the sidesof themihrab,orwoveninto apatternedrug.Decorationbecomesmerelyornamentonlywhenits communalsymbolismhas been lost.To theoutsider it becomesperipheral,ormerelyornamental,becausethepointof itwithin the framework thatgivesitmeaninghas beenlost.It is acorollaryof these viewsthat thetraditional Muslim artistrejectsthe Western"museum"' viewofart. Artobjectsarenotthingssetapartfromeverydayaffairsto becollectedtogetherin aspecial placebut arepartandparcelof theeverydaylifeofthecommunityand the individual.Artobjectsare foundintheordinaryroundsoflife: themosqueandmihrab,public gardensandfountains,rugson thefloor of themosqueandhouse,thedrinkingglassonthetable,theilluminations of thebookbeingread,andsoon. Tobesure,thereis aMuseumofIslamicArt inCairo,but Muslimsdo not often fre-quentit.Itismainlyfor the useof Westerntourists and arthistorians.Whyshould aMuslimgotheretoseerugs,fountains,sec-tionsof carvedceilings,tilework,mosqueimplements,and accoutrementswhen he seesthesethingsin hisdailyroundofliving?It istruethatifheisinterestedin historicalorperiodpieces,ifhewantstosee anexampleofaFatamidglass carving,an Abbasidtapestry,or anOmayyadfountain,the MuslimwillgototheMuseumofIslamicArt. In thiscase,however,he realizesthatheis interestedin
EDWARDMADDEN
someaspectofthehistoryofart ratherthanrespondingto the artifactsperse.TheMus-lim,likeanypersoninanytraditionalsociety,doesnotconfuseknowledgeabout art withwhat art is about.4
II.
Without theforegoingwe cannot understandthe natureofIslamicart;it isnecessaryforanyadequatecharacterization.Itisnot,how-ever,sufficientfor such a characterization.What we have writtenistrueof alltraditional,communal,religiousart-ofHindu, Buddhist,Byzantine,and Western MedievalChristianart as well asofMuslim art.What we neednow is a delineationof those beliefsand com-mitmentswhich form thedistinctivelyIslamiccommunal frameworkand which are re-flectedinthe dominantartistic motifsofMuslim art.Islam isat oncevery straightforwardandyetcomplex.The fivepillarsof thefaitharethese:beliefinAllahas the one andonlyGod;fivedailycommunionswith,orprayersto,Allah;benevolentcareof theneedyanddis-advantaged; fastingduringthedaylighthours of themonth ofRamadan;and apil-grimage,ifpossible,oncein aperson'slife-time to theholy cityof Mecca.Islam is com-plexbecausefromthemain,orthodox Sunnitradition,there havesplinteredoff anumberofsmaller,competingtraditions:Kharijite,Shia, Ismaili,andDruze,to nameonlythemostimportant.Most of thesesplinter groupsareto be accountedfor onpersonalandpoliticalgrounds,at leastat theirinception,thoughdoctrinal differencealsoemergedeventually.Within the Sunnitraditionitselfcomplica-tionsarose,the main onebeinga tensionbetweenthelegaltraditionalists,who em-phasizedthesufficiencyof theKoran and theHadith(recordedtraditionsof what theProphetandtheCompanionssaid anddid),and theSufimystics-themselvesquitediverseandcomplex.MysticslikeAl-Ghazaliempha-sizedthatlegalismmust besupplementedwith apersonalcommunionwithAllah andthatthe law must notbe followedblindlybutfrompropermotives.(Certainly manyofthelegalistsincludedthesenotionsfromthebeginning.)ManySufimysticsweremore
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...