Dears Readers,I am presenting the short text, with which I refer to fundamental words eg: tohave, to be, to see, to get to know, to make oneself aware, to read etc. I triedto formulate only such sentences which I regarded essential and true. So which Iam helping myself sensibly and safely to move amongst people and especially in thetangle of their texts. So which I am helping myself sensibly and safely to moveamongst people and especially in the tangle of their texts.So to speak I amplacing them in the right place. I am reacting to persons with my text which everyday experiences and so highly which words they are personifying that after all itis hard for them to communicate between itself. For example, I cannotindifferently listen when somebody states that "the article is determining" orthat "the Bible is saying" and that "the book is showing".The reader can think forhimself that I am disregarding people for myself or I went crazy when I am writingthat words don't make sense. Just the opposite, simply I tried in reality becauseto present them we are using them not only logically, sensibly, stylistically,politely but also mainly like an object. I propose to watch them at the same timedistancing oneself towards them, peculiarly for expression "IS" . Many ancientphilosophers at first established how to use the word: is in order farthersensibly to talk. I must here explain, that replacing the expression: IS adifferent expression: TO NAME exclusively I am emphasizing that indeed I am namingsomebody or something when I state, around somebody (something) is somebody(something). I am using words conventionally but whether truly? I got used to usewords, I am giving my opinion routinely the way they taught me, the way I taughtalone to use them with them, sometimes quite absurdly. For example, whetherentering the bus we are becoming passengers of the bus, and leaving are we turningagain into the passer-by?. Nonsens! After all it will be sufficient to state, thatentering the bus both I can and it is possible to call me the passenger of the busif I am going to manifest itself oneself accurately and truly.However I am doubting that people are going to give their opinion so precisely inview of the second person. Where could we for ourselves then carefree chat?1. I live amongst people differently referring not only to you of God butparticularly towards oneself and what is being found around us. I differ from themnot only religiously, politically, philosophically but also above allintellectually. Because many of us even not try to formulate the logical image ofworld and the man for oneself2. Unfortunately, contemporary people are making themselves reading colourmagazines, incessantly working, drowning each other out with heartless music,staring at the TV set or the computer monitor, escaping from oneself into the mostdistant nooks of the Earth, not wondering at nobody and nothing, cynicallyperceiving of God and the man. They are turning from God starting believing intoeverything what doesn't concern Him but indirectly is striking in his Person. Inspite of it I notice million of people which are trying to live and to developintellectually loving God.3. I am addressing this work to persons wanting to realize oneself truly, nice,judiciously and morally .To the ones of which poisoning mental addictions didn'ttake control To the ones which critically notice oneself and world. To the oneswhich didn't shut themselves away in oneself or the family or religious group orpolitical party or in some mutual admiration societyTo a free person, still andcourageously expanding field of choice and at the same time organising oneself
Leave a Comment