• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 3
    CommentGo Back
Download
M ilfred D u ll; P h .D . \ue000
U C C IU lC dP s y c h o lo g is t \ue000
2 2 0IS W
2 9
111
S lrc c l \ue000
T o p c lw .K .S
06611 \ue000
D IV IS IO N2
1 7 1 1 5 ) 2 6 7 -tl0 2 5IP 'll((7 R S )2 6 < ;..6 5 4 (,
< i!h
~
,
,
!
t
.
I
A
.
Y
2
'
1
'
;
I
.
\
,
I
I
.
:
\
l
m
\ue000
A p ri1 2 ,2 0 0 2
H o n o ra b le R ic h a rd A n d e rso n
D iv isio n 2 D istrict C o u rt
Shaw neeC o u n t\' C ounhouse
200 SE1 " s tm it
.
T o p e k a .K S
(N iB
R E :
C ase N o. 9 6 -0 \u00b72 1 7
D earJ u d g e A nderson:
P le a s e c o n s id e r th is le tte rm yre p o rto n m yw o rti nIh c : above case.
Inm yId le ro f F e b ru a ry7 , 2 0 ()2 ,a n di n
th eS ta tu s C onferenceo fM a rc h1 1 , 2002, I a g n :e d to assessth e issueso f dangerousnessi n this case and
a s k e dth eC o u rtfo r p e n n is s io n1 0 a d d n :s sth e fa c to rs th a t c a u s e da n d m a in ta in e dlb c c o n J lic tsi nth e h o p e s
o fd e v e lo p in g s o m ek in do f g u id e lin e so rb lu e p rin tfo r th e fu tu reo f th e c o u p le 'I i c h ild I d e c lin e dth eta lk o f
a na s s e s s m e n t lim ite d to M s. D o m b r o s k i's p o tc :n tia llOh a n n o r k ill h tr d a u g h te r fo rf 'C 8 S O n so u L liru :d inth e
February7 . 2002. le lle ra a da t tb e Status C oofenm cc.
[u n d e rsto o dth eC o u rt's d ire c tio nlh a Im y w o rt w as
n o t toa c k b 'e s s a n y p o te n tia l c h a n g eo f re s id e n tia l c u s to d yo ra n y re < O D S id c ra tio no fp a s tC o u rt d e c is io n so r
C ourt orders.T he C ourt w antedt ok n o w about potential dangerousness,i tW B J Ite dl Ok n o wb o w1 0 a d d te a
th ee x te n d e d a n d~
i
s
t
e
n
c
:
e
\ue000c o n fiic ts b e tw e e n th ep o n ie s . a n di l w a n te d a v is ita tio n /p a re n tin g tim ep la n
th a t w as a p p ro p ria tea n d w o rk a b le ,
M yw o rkw irhth ep a rtie sto w a rd $t h e s e g o a lsh a dg o n e w e ll p r io rt o
th ere v o c a tio no fm y s ta tu sa s th e C o u rt'sC M lIu a to r
T h e in fo rm a tio nu p o n w h ic hlh i.!i re p o rti s b a s e d in c lu d e :
a nw iewo fw riltcna n d w e tH ii.tc m atcriaJs.
m u J tip le c o n v e r s a tio n sw i1 hy o ua n d nvo Court Services o ffic e t5 (botbo f w homw ere CaseM a n a g e rsi nth e
case), th re e tw o -h o u t sessions w itb C laudine D o m b ro s k ia n d her Q lJ1 'C IlI husband.o o c tw o-hour session
w ith H al R ic h a rd s o n . th e S ta tu s C o n fc n ::n c c o n M arch1 1 . 2 0 0 2 . a n d acoD versation w ith a n a tto rn e y b e in g
c o n sid e re da saG A L.a ll th ec a s e .
A t lh c d ir e c tio no f!h eC o u rt, C la u d in eD o m b ro s k ia n d h e rC U I1 '1 :l1 th u s b a n ds u b m iU e d a$ 5 0 ()(}~
1 0
C Q V ef U tec o s t so fth ee v a J .u a lio n .
Is u b filc q u c n tly m et w ithth e m
intw o -b o u r a p p o in tm e n ts o n~
1
a
r
c
1
l
\ue000t8 .
2 0 0 2 .M a n :b 2 1 .2 0 0 2 .a n dM a re b2 S ,2 0 0 2 ,
Im et w ilh themlo g C lh c :r because I p c ttIC iv e dth e current
husband as ap o te n tia l h e lp fu l person in m oving M s. D om broski tow ard less adversarial andp o la rtT .e d
p o s itio n s . a sw eU a s a p o tc n lia l h e lpi ng e ttin g h e rc o stick to a g n :e m e n ts o n c esh e m adeth e m .
I nm y Iirs n n e c tiD g w ith M s.D o m b ro llk ia n dh e r current husband. M s.D om broskip re s e n te dh e r side of th e
c a s e a n da d d n : : s s e d a lo n g lis t o f c o n c e m s sh eh a d a b o u t ju s ta b o u t c :v e -ry o n ein v o lv e d ioth ec a s e .o rM r.
R ic lw d s o n . she descnO cd his aD csed "abuse" of! t e r s eI f and R iW
a s w e ll a sh o wsh eh a d trie d1 0 " 'fig h ti t "
th ro u g hin v o lv in gSR Sa n d th ep o lic e .
W henI asked her, "W hy arc Ih in g s th is w ayT
M s. D om broski
S la te d ." b e c a u s e w h e n (l e f tm y e x - h u s b a n d . I w ass tu p id "a n dth a ts h e d id n 't b e lie v e R ik k l w o u ld e v e rb e
g iv e nt o H al R ic h a rd so n .
S h ew ento ntoc ritic i7 .c M r. R ic h a rd s o n . h isa ltO m c y . a f o n n c rG A L . o nlh e
c a s e ,a n d ap re v io u s ju d g eo n lb c c a s e .P c rb llp sa s aw ayo f m tio n a liz in gh e r f'a ilu r e si np re v io u s c o u n
p
r
o
o
e
e
d
i
n
~
,
\ue000s h ea ls oc ritic iz e d sevem lo fh e rp n :'V io u s anom cys fo r " s e llin g(h e r)dow n th eriv e r'" o r
ra ilin gt os e t asid e tim eo c c e s s a t y to s u c c e s s fu lly litig a te th e c a s e o n h e r b e b a lf.
2
W hen I a & .k c dM s.D o m b ro s k i w hat tlte C oon's v ie w orh e r w as. she again c ritic iz e dS C 'V e ttlIo f those w ho
h a db e e np re v io u s ly in v o lv e d .
H O w e\'er. a f te r e x p la h 'lin gth a t s u c h a i t i c i s m sw eren o t g o in g to g e lh e r
a
n
y
w
h
~
w ithm e o rIh c C o o n . I rc fm m e dth e q u e s tio n to "W hat m ig h tJ u d g e A n d e rs o ns a yi sth en :8 s o n
Ih in g s a rcth ew ayth e )' a re ? "
T o th tssh e re p lie d . " B e c a u s e ( ilid n o t c o m p ly w ithth e coW 1-ordcrt om ove
toT o p e k a .
W h ic hi sw ro n g ."
W henI in ld T U p 1 c dh e r toi J t s t r u c 1h e rt - o s a y w h a t sh e th o u g h t th eJ u d g e
m ig h ts a y r a th e r th a n h e r o p in io n . s h ep a u s e d am o m e n t.. th e na d d e d . \u00b7'b e c a u s eJ c o n tin u e dt oa p p e a l th e
o rd e rs..o o n tin u c d1 0r e s i s t o rd e rs\ 0g o\ 0 T o p e k a ."
Ie x p la in e d
1 0 M s. D om broskia n d herh u sb a n dI l a a tI
m ig h t oO ena s k th e m
1 0see s itu a tio n s (rom a perspectiveb e s i d e s theirow ni n our w o rk since d o in g Ihis
w o u ldb en o c .c s s a ry1 0re d u c eth e oonO icui nth e case
I n th is firstm e e tin g . I a ls o e s ta b lis h e d (h u ll w o u ld in le n u p ta o dre d ire c t th ep ro c t!S S w h e n e v e ri td i g r e s s e d
3 w n y f r o mO O D S tn u :tiv e a c tiv iry .
Ina d d itJ o n toim e n u p tin g M s. D o m b r o s k ia s d e s c n b e d a b o v e , [
in tC IT U p te dh e r h u s b a n d 's d e s c rip tio no fM r. R ic b ru d s o nw ith8q u ic k q u e s tio n . " W o u ld y o u s a y th a ti f h e
(M r. R ic b u rd so n ) w ash e r e ?
O r,i fR illi w ash e r e T '
W henb es a i d . \u00b7'N o ."Is ta te dth a t.Q Il e a s t w ilh inth e
e v a J u a tiO l'l process.t h e s e tw oq U C S lio n s w ould establish thec r i t e r i aro r w hat couldb e said.
I fi t w a s n 'l
a c c e p ta b letob e s a id d ire c tly to a n e th e r p e rs o n o ri nfro n to rR ik ltJ.i t p ro b a b lys h o u ld n 'lb e sa id .
J na d d itio n . le :q J la in e dt oM s. D o m b ro s k ia n dh e r b u s b a n dtb a li t W lI9
n o tm yin te rn to rclw lhth e ir
c o m p la in tsa b o u t th e p e o p le in v o l\'e d .th ele g a ls y S lC m .o r !h ep ro o c :s .stb e yh a de x p e r i c : z I c e d . 1 re fe re n c e d
th e" p rc -e v a lu a tio o n e g o tia lio o s " a s e v id c n o e th a tth e C o u rtb a dn oin tC S 'C S ti n th is.
I n e e d e d1 0k n o wi fM s,
D om broskic o u l du n d e rs ta n dtile C o u r t's v ie w o r h c r ;n a m e ly .th a i R f k k iw as liv in g" ' i t h M r. R ichardson
because th eC o w t v ie w e d M s. D om broskia s re fu sin gt os Iw e R illi w ilh M r. R ichardsona n db e c a u s e M s.
D o m b ro sk i', p n :v io u s a c :tiO D SI u J dJ e dth e C o u rt tov ie w
h c r a s h a v io g littlet o n o c n :d ib ility .
I cm phasiza!
th a t th e C o u rt,nfa c t b e lie v e d M s. D om broski h a se
n
~
g
e
d
ina c tiv e d e c e p lio n s o n
lIlJtU C .'!fO O So c c a s i o n s
o v e r th ec o u r s e o flh c c o n flic t.
I a ls o e x p la in e db o wth e s etw ois s u e sh a d c o n lrib u tc d toth e v ie wo rM s. D o m b ro s k i a s p o te n tia lly
d a n g e ro u st QI . h . cp o in t w IleRth e :C ase M anagerB O dth eO C her
s id e W lU ltc dJ O D 1 .Cn : : a s s u r .a n c ca b o u ts a f e t y
is s u e s ..
B a s ic a lly , th es a f e t y a n x ie tyW B5 th a t.i f M s. D om broski c o u ld n e v e r" s h a r e R ik Id " w ithM r.
R ic h a rd s o na n di fth eCOW 1 w o u ldn o tre tu rn rc s id .e n d a lC U S K ld yt o her, sbe m i8 h tg e t
d c s p a r a tcc n o u g Illo
ta k eR ik J d 'sliIe ,th e nc a k eh e row n ra th e rth a na U o w in gR ik k it o c o n tin u e rc s jd in gw ithh e rfa th c :r.
M s. D om broski's responset o the" s I 1 a n : : R ik k j" question w ast od e s c r i b e her versiono fsom e o f th e events
in D cccm ber 2 0 0 0 . S h e a d m ilS1 0 ta k in g R ik k i w ithh e r a f t e r s h ew as "n ip C d "b y M r. R ichardson.
S lIC
e v e n tu a lly b r o u s h t R illi b a c kaD dtu rn e d b c n c J fa n dR ik Jdi na t th ep o llo c s ta tio n .
It w as fro mth e fe th a l
R iJ c k j W B5p la c .c di n M r. R icbardsoo',c u s to d y .
M ya p p ro a c ht os u ic id er i s k . w asa ls o e x p la in e di nth isf i r s t1 IC S S i0 n .."T h e a p p ro a c hfo llo w s a m odel
d e v e lo p e db y M cn.niftser p s y c b o lo g la tsltU d y in g s u ic id ei nth e
1 9 8 0 s .
T h is m odelr o c u s e so n tw oa s p c d S
o fII p R iC D I's sease o fS C lf: w hati l c a lle dth e "falses e tr and w hati sc a lle d the "tru e scI!"n e false selris
as o c ia l self. ap a r to r0 U I'S IC lv e sth a iw es h o w
1 0 o tb c :rsa n dfo rw h ic hI..b .e y m ay a d m iJ eu s ..T h e bU e s e l fi s a
p riV < ltcp a r to fom 5C 1v e s Ih a ri l ls e l d o ms ::.mb y O lhers. o tte ob e c a u & t
i t c o u ta in s Ib o u g b tsa b o u t O tIl"IlC J v e s
thataR :q u ite personala n dIh o Iw ed oo o t w antt os h a r e .
S u ic id eo a ki sa ti t sh i g h e s tw beatb e rci ssom e:
k in do fin c s a tp a b k : o r im o tw b le p s y c h o lo g ic a l d is tre s s IU d s o m ep tC C ip ifD lin sC \'C D l th re a te n s o u r
fu D C tio n a J" r a J s e "s e n s eo fs e lf .
T he p r c c iP la lia gC \'C n te ith e ri n s o m ew ay in v a lid a te sIh c fa lse s e lf o r
le a d st oa lo sso fI.b ca d m irin g a ld ie n o c w h ile a t th e s a m e tim e e x p o s ill8a s p e c tso r th etro e s c ltth a l a rc
te rrib ly h u m ilia tin g .
If Ih c th re a tt oth eIN C s e lfi sc x p e ric :n Q !:da s in e s c a p a b lea s w cU . s u ic id e becom esa
re a lp o s s ib ility .
ru s e dth eO J .S im p s o n c a s c w ith(h e o o u p lct oiU U S lra teIh c s ec o n c e p ts ..
W ealso discussedth ew ebs i 1 e inIb is m eeting.
IIw asd c s c r i b c da s b e in gc o n s u u c t e d- t ok e e ph o p ea
J
j
"
e
~
\ue000
w ithre s p e c t toR ilk i.
I sharedm y v ie w that th e w ebs i t e m ay' have positive m eaningt oM s. D o m b ro sk i,
b u ti ta p p e a r e dt ofu n c tio na s a p ro v o c a tio n1 0 M r. R ic h a rd s o na n dp a h a p s e v e n.h e C o u rt b e c a u s eo r its
oootenta n dth e lack ofbaJaooe c o n o c rn in g th e is s u e so f im p o rta n o ci n th ec a s e .
3
,
A llh cc n do fthe lirst m eeting. 1em phasized M s. D om broskl's need1 0 focus on Iw oIn n jo r issues.
F irst
she nccdod1 0 con\'juce !h e C ourta n d M r. R ichardsonlb .1 1 she could "shan::" Rikki\ t i l b M r. Richardson.
S e c o n d .sh e n e e d e d1 0 e a r n c rc d ib ililv w ilh Ih eC O U i1a n d M r. R ic h a rd s o n b e fo res J l Cw o u ldb e o llo w e d a n v
a d d itio n a l o r u n s u p e rv is e d lim e \"i.lh-IQ kki.
I in s tru c te d M s. D om broski1 0p u rc h a .'iCa c o p yo f th eb o o k ..
\u00ad
G e ttin g1 0 Y e s. re g a rd in g th e d iffe re n c e s b e tw e e np o s itio n a lb a rg a in in g a n d p rin c ip le d n e g o tia tio n
Ja ls o
re m in d e d thec o u p leo fth e C o u rt's focus0 1 1 visitation m t.hcrI I I IlJ Ic u s t o d y issues.
A nd fin a lly . Ia s k e d w b a t M s. D o m b ro s k i's re a c tio n m ig h lb e1 0 a fa c e -to -fa c e m e e tin g w ith M r.
R ichardson.
B o thtilts .D om broskia u d her husband Ih o u g h la b o u t Ih isfo r a 'm in u le . th e n S la te dth e y w o u ld
b e w illin g1 0d o this after I a s s u r e dth e m th a tb o l.hs i d e s w o u ldb e p rq :J a re dfo r Ih is m c c tin g m uch in
..d v a n c co fi I a c lu a lly h a p p e n in g .
.
M s. D om broskia n dM r. Y o c k e r s cam e1 0Ih e s e c o n d m e e tin go n M a n :b 2 1 , 2 0 0 2 . w ilb tw oc o p ie so f th e
Q sm in g1 0y
~
b o o k .
M s. D o m b ro s k i w a s p a rtic u la rly e x c ile dahQ utt i l e id e a so
f
~
n
e
g
o
t
i
.
a
l
i
n
g
"
\ue000re g a rd in g
R ik k i,a lth o u g hsh e b e c a m e d is a p p o in te d w h e nl i r i e d1 0 s lo wh e rdow nb ys ta lin g .- r th in ky o u
th iR k . w e're
o ns te p4 .
I th in k w e'reo ns te p1 .5 ."
M s. D o m b ro sk ih a d b ro u g h t a num bero fd
o
c
u
m
c
n
t
.
~
\ue000M lhh e ra n d
h a n d e d th e m o v e ro n eb y o n e a tth eb e g in n in go flh e : m e e tin g .
W ilhe a c ho n esh eh a d IU Je x p la n a tio n o s1 0
w hatp o in ls h ew n n te d
O ICt og e tfro m
1 1 .
S h e : n O ieds h eIrn e w th is p ro c e s s w as q u ite " p o s itio tW l:'b u ts h e
fe lt an e e d to g iv em e th e s eth in g s , a fte rw h ic hsh ew as g o in g totry1 0 Ih in klIb o u lth e :p rin c 1 p 1 c s u n d e rly in g
v c u io u s p o s itio n s - e v e n th o s e d iffe re n t fro mh e row n-ra th e r IbD n ju s l lh in k in gIIb o u t fro m
w b a t p o s itio n
sh e w a n te d to n e g o tia te .
Ib rie fly re v ie w e dth e d o c u m e n ts .b u t 0 0 1 )'com rncnlcd o n d le fin t tw os h es a v c
m e.
l1 1 ef i r s to n ew as the ordersh ed a im c d gaveh e r perm issiont o m ove1 0 O real B end. although I
e x p la in e dth a i I read Ihis o rd e r1 0b e
11 tem poraryo r d e r w lIb a notation.a t Ihee n dlb a t a perm anentorder
w o u ldb e m adea t th e tim eth e d iv o r c ew as fin a liz e d .
Inth eO rdero fD i\'O T C ed a te d in 1 9 9 6 ( re a dth a t M s.
D o m b r o s k i w as d ire c te dt o re lo c .1 leb a c kt o T o p e k a .
H
o
~
'
C
V
c
:
r
.
\ue000rather th a ns p e n dth cc o n la c t tim efC V le w in g docum cnts,Ireilem ted ourn e e d to focus onb o w
lh eC o U i1c :n m et ov ie w M s. D om broskia s b e i.n 8 W lW illin gt os h a reIU .k k i w ith M r. IQ chardsona n d w h a t
a c tio n sm ig h tb ed o n ea b o u t Ib is .In itia lly . M s. D om broski c la lm c d .- ]
n e v e rre n l.lyw a n te dt ola k eh e r
o o m p le te ly ."
T h ro u g ht e a r sa n d w ithM r_ Y ockers's u p p o rt. s h e e x p la in e dv a rim wp a s tev en tsa n dh e r
ra tio n a lefo r th e m .
Ia J lc rn a te db e tw e e na c tiv elis te n in ga n d in lC m J p lin g h e r w hensh eb e g a nt o p r e s s w b ll
I p e rc e iv e d1 0b e o n c --sid c d v ie w s th a t m ig h tp o la ri7 ..e th e s itu a lio nra th e r th a n re s u lti n s o lu tio n s .
F illa U y . I im crvcneda n df o c u s e do u r d .i!ilC U 5 s io n on th e w e bs ite .
'.
,.' , .
.,.:.
Is ta te d th a tth e :w eb
s i t e w as in fla m m a to ry to w a rd s o th e rs (e.g ., M r.R ic lw d s o n . lh eC ase l\ilanager,a n d d le C o u rt)a n d th a t its
c o n te n t p c rp c Iu a te dn o to o 1 ylh e c o n flic tb u ta ls oth ev ie wo fM s.D o m b ro s k ia s U IItlb le
t o" s h a r eR
.
i
l
l
i
'
~
\ue000
a n da sd e s e r v in g IiltJe c ro d ib ili t y fro m
th e C o o rt.
M r.Y e c k e l'Ss u g g e s t e d lh a ti tb e s h u tdow n.
H ow ever. I
h a dn o tio e ds o m e th io g v e ry in tc n ::stm g a b o u l M s.D o m b ro s k .i\u00b7 s dem eanori nlb c se :ssio n s.
W hen ta lk in g
a b o u ta b u s e is s u e s . sh e a Im o f;t a lw a y s becam e te a rfu la n dh e r q u a lityo fh e r th in k in gs u i f e r e d . W bcau p s e t
lik eth is .h e re m o tio n s c le a rlyim p a c te dh e r c a p a c ity fo r ra tio n a l th o u g h l8 J I d p la n n in g .
H ow ever.w hen
,d e s c rib in g& h ea d v o c ::a c yiS S U C !lre la te d1 0 th e w eb s ite , sh e s e e m e d m o re o rg a a iz .c d
a n dh e rablJity to
e x p r e s sh e rth o u g h ts im p ro v e d .
II w as c le a rth a t Ib cw ebs ite w as b o th ap la c e1 0 fig h t (e s p e c ia lly w hen s h e
fillt s b e o o u I d n 's6 g b !tn o th e r w ays)a s w ella sa n actM ty from w hichw
d e riv I:d considc:rnblc: self-esteem
f
i
a n dc o n f i d e n c e .
I suggested w ayso fre o rg a n i7 jn ga b e w ebs i t es o th a tth o s e w hos u p p o r t e dh e r(a n dv 1 < lC
i
v e r s a )h a d th e irn e e d s m e t. w ltiJc s im u lla l1 c o u s ly h o p in g tog a in s o m ec re d ib ility w ith th e C ounb y
re m o v in g all rc.ferencc.st o M r. R ichardsona s w ell os any refereoccst o R iW
th a Ip o rlm y c :d M r. R ichard!iO n
in a n e g a tiv c m a n n e r.
I even sketchedI In o wc h a J ta n d a p a g e u u llin c fo r M s. D om broski1 0u sc in h e r
p la n n in ga b o u th o wt ore d e s ig nth e : s ite1 0a
c
h
i
~
'
C
\ue000th e s ec b jc c tiv c s .
I no u rthird m e e tin go n M arch 25. 2002. M s_ D om broski proudJyo p e n e dth ellIIO C lin gb y stating." W e 'v e
s h u t d O l\'J l t h e w eb s i t e ! "
S b eh a dl..1 k e nm y a m 'io et op o s tI )ItIC $ S IIg e s ta ti.o gth es i t e w as c lo s e d fo r
re d e s ig n in g .
Acopyo f w hatM s. D om broskic
l
a
i
m
.
~
\ue000toh a v ep o s te di s .a tta c h e d to thisre p o rt.
H ow ever,
w henl \ ' Ctrie dt o a c c e s s th e w eb s ile . as e n t e r p ro b le m
p r e v e n te dm efro mg e ttin g1 0 it.
M s. D om broskie \u00b7
m ailedm eo o p ic so fth e m a te ria ls h e claim s1 0h a v c p o s te d .
D uring th em e e tin g . w e a a llc da n d IaJked to
Ih ew ebm astera nT e x a sa b o u lo u r p ro b le m s 3 C ()C S S in g abcs i t eb u t\ t ' Cw erep o ( a b le1 0 v ie wth e site1 0 " je w
i t s n o lea b o u tb e in gc l o s e d fo r re d e s ig n .
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
Anonymoms

This REPORT to the Courts in 2002 was a $5,000.000 Report. Bud Dale and associates now charge in excess of $10,000.00 to $15,000.00-Starting fees for their Court Whored Services.

reply03 / 29 / 2010
Anonymoms

Topeka, Kansas. Dr. Bud Dale: http://buddale.com/index.html This Psycho whacko is now really bringing in the cash for spilled blood.... Dr. 'Bud" Dale PhD and J.D. Talk about your EXPERT Court *****. http://whoresofthecourt.com/ Take a good look Kansas at all the WHORES in the COURT: http://www.buddalelaw.com ; http:/www.Spiridigliozzi-Dale.com STAY as far away from these Court Whores who vi

reply03 / 29 / 2010
Anonymoms

This Psycho whacko is now really bringing in the cash for spilled blood.... Dr. 'Bud" Dale PhD and J.D. Talk about your EXPERT Court *****. http://whoresofthecourt.com/

reply03 / 29 / 2010
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...