Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
 
NAVALPOSTGRADUATESCHOOL
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
THESIS
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimitedINDIAN NUCLEAR COMMAND AND CONTROLDILEMMA
 byRakesh Kumar September 2006Thesis Co-Advisors: Dan C.Boger Peter R.Lavoy
 
 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
 
ii 
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
 
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
 
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction,searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Sendcomments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, toWashington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503.
 
1. AGENCY USE ONLY
(Leave blank)
 
2. REPORT DATE
 September 2006
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
 Master’s Thesis
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Indian Nuclear Command and Control Dilemma
6. AUTHOR(S)
Rakesh Kumar 
5. FUNDING NUMBERS7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
 Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, CA 93943-5000
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
 
9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
 N/A
10. SPONSORING/MONITORINGAGENCY REPORT NUMBER
 
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policyor position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government.
12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
 
13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words)
The aim of the thesis to analyze the India’s nuclear weapons command and control dilemma as a consequence of its 1998 nuclear tests. The small size of India’s nuclear weapons does not imply that its command and controlstructure would be simple. It would require the same infrastructure, capabilities, and operating concepts possessed bycountries with larger number of nuclear weapons, but maybe on a smaller scale. A small arsenal is easy to control, butthen it is vulnerable to attack, and hence the issue of command and control becomes more complex. India’s No-First-Use (NFU) policy and the de-mated nuclear posture also make the command and control of nuclear weapons look simple, affordable, and easy to implement. But the nuclear policy and posture must be examined through the prism of  peacetime, crisis and wartime situations. The smooth transition from peacetime to crisis and, if required, to wartimedemands a robust command and control system.This thesis examines the requirements and then provides recommendations for the command and control structurefor Indian nuclear operations. The thesis will investigates the U.S. command and control model and draws lessons for a suitable option for India. While NFU has many challenges, it can be effective provided that India adopts anoperational capability of Launch After Attack (LAA), which would require a significant upgrade of command andcontrol structure and procedures. In particular, this thesis demonstrates the role that civilians and military couldeffectively play to strengthen “minimum credible deterrence” within the established financial, political, and strategic parameters.
15. NUMBER OFPAGES
 143
14. SUBJECT TERMS
Nuclear command and control, nuclear weapons, civil-military relations
16. PRICE CODE
 
17. SECURITYCLASSIFICATION OFREPORT
 Unclassified
18. SECURITYCLASSIFICATION OF THISPAGE
Unclassified
19. SECURITYCLASSIFICATION OFABSTRACT
Unclassified
20. LIMITATION OFABSTRACT
UL
 NSN 7540-01-280-5500
S
tandard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18
 
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more