Page No.2 of 10
Were these anti-terrorist operations, supposedly carried out as per “procedureestablished by law”, as envisaged in Article-21 of the Constitution of India andcannons of the Rule of Law or not?3.3.
Shri Vanzara should clarify as to what kind of “existential crisis” (para 10 VL)the State Govt. had faced3.4.
In what way police officers who derive power and authority by virtue of beingin a functional executive post as per law (CRPC, Police Acts, Gujarat Police Manual-GPM etc.) could stand “beside Govt. like a bulwark” (para 10 VL)? Please get alldetails of actions taken in this connection by him.3.5.
As creatures of law, is it mandatory for police officers to help Govt. facing any“existential crisis” (political or otherwise)?3.6.
If the answer is positive it may be clarified as to what kind of help, assistanceand support was extended by Shri Vanzara and his team to the State Govt. to tideover the crisis? Pinpointed and threadbare details should be sought.3.7.
What kind of help and support was expected by arrested police officers (para11 VL) from the Govt. within the framework of law? This point is relevant in the lightof legal position of the State Govt. being complainant / plaintiff, as per law in all casesregistered, investigated, and charge-sheeted, even if govt. servants are the accusedpersons.3.8.
Did not Shri Vanzara know that any informal or formal help from State Govt. toaccused persons, not permitted by law and administrative regulations, would betreated as acts punishable under various sections enumerated in chapter-XI of IndianPenal Code (IPC)-offences against public justice, particularly under sections 202, 203,204, 217, 218, and 219 etc.(para 12 VL).3.9.
In para 12 VL it is mentioned that the State Govt. “has been clandestinelymaking all efforts to keep me and my officers in jail”. Information on these illegal andunethical efforts by the Govt. should be provided by Shri Vanzara.3.10.
With reference to para 14 VL, Shri Vanzara should clarify as to whether he andother accused did ask for legal assistance, from State Govt., on the ground that thealleged fake encounters were committed in pursuance of legal duties by the accusedpersons? If such a request was made what was the response of the Govt.? Pleaseprovide all details.3.11.
What action was taken by the State Govt. to get bails (para 14 VL) to Shri M. N.Dinesh and Shri Narendra Amin cancelled?3.12.
What are “the legal and political intrigues, machinations and maneuverings of Shri Amitbhai Shah” (para 15 VL) for getting trials of Shohrabuddin and Tulsiram casestransferred out of the state of Gujarat?3.13.
What are the specific acts, covert or overt, towards “completely mismanaging asensitive dept. like police” done by Shri Amitbhai Shah? (para 18 VL).