Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
R B Sreekumar Representation to Justice Bedi Commission requesting for immediate initiation of investigation on the basis of facts disclosed in D.G. Vanzara's Resignation Letter dated 1st September, 2013.

R B Sreekumar Representation to Justice Bedi Commission requesting for immediate initiation of investigation on the basis of facts disclosed in D.G. Vanzara's Resignation Letter dated 1st September, 2013.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 351|Likes:
Published by Sanjiv Bhatt
The essence of the Terms of Reference of the STF require it to “look” into and to “thoroughly investigate” the various encounters that took place in Gujarat. Such a thorough investigation will obviously entail going into the machinations of the state machinery, their maneuverings, manipulations, formal and informal line of command, unwritten rules of conduct, existence of extra-constitutional authority, mutual considerations and hidden understandings prevalent and obtaining in the state of Gujarat. Mercifully for the investigators, Shri Vanzara, a chief architect and key player of a few of such encounters, has elaborated upon significant details and even sufficiently hinted at other players of this unconstitutional and unholy games. The STF may please seize upon this opportunity and examine VL and seek the help of its writer to dwell upon its content so as to investigate the entire gamut of these encounters.
The essence of the Terms of Reference of the STF require it to “look” into and to “thoroughly investigate” the various encounters that took place in Gujarat. Such a thorough investigation will obviously entail going into the machinations of the state machinery, their maneuverings, manipulations, formal and informal line of command, unwritten rules of conduct, existence of extra-constitutional authority, mutual considerations and hidden understandings prevalent and obtaining in the state of Gujarat. Mercifully for the investigators, Shri Vanzara, a chief architect and key player of a few of such encounters, has elaborated upon significant details and even sufficiently hinted at other players of this unconstitutional and unholy games. The STF may please seize upon this opportunity and examine VL and seek the help of its writer to dwell upon its content so as to investigate the entire gamut of these encounters.

More info:

Published by: Sanjiv Bhatt on Sep 11, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/11/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 Page No.1 of 10
Plot No:-193,‘Sreelekshmideepam’Sector-8, GANDHINAGAR - 382008Phone: 079-23247876M: 9428016117Email: rbsreekumar71@yahoo.comWeb-site: www.harmonynotes.inRespected sir,
Request for initiating immediate imperative investigationon facts given in the resignation letter dated 1
st
September, 2013by Shri. D.G. Vanzara I.P.S, DIGPcurrently under suspensionRef 
: STF Public Notification dated 16/07/20121.
 
Your kind attention is drawn to my letter to you No: RBS/STF/FE/03/2012 dated30
th
August, 2012, presenting facts known to me about cases of alleged fakeencounters investigated by the Special Task Force (STF), chaired by you.2.
 
Recently (on 1
st
September, 2013), Shri. D.G. Vanzara I.P.S, DIGP, undersuspension, an accused in four alleged fake encounter cases, has submitted hisresignation letter to the Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Gujarat, apparently being frustrated over the alleged betrayal and breach of trust bythe State Govt., who had failed to provide adequate assistance, support andprotection to him and other accused officers arrested and imprisoned. This lettercontains a plethora of facts, observations, admissions, and confessions havingrelevance to alleged fake encounters being probed by the STF headed by you and tothe terms of reference narrated by STF in its Public Notice dated 16
th
July, 2012. Acopy of Shri. D.G. Vanzara’s resignation letter is enclosed, as Annexure-A
3.
 
In this context, I humbly request the STF to initiate further action on thematerial in Shri. D.G. Vanzara’s resignation letter on the following aspects:-
3.1.
 
In para 9 of Shri. D. G. Vanzara’s resignation letter (herein after referred to asVL), he mentions that he and his officers are “loyal soldiers of this (Gujarat) Govt….(who) fought incessant war against Pakistan inspired terrorism.” Shri Vanzara shouldbe asked to provide data on specific actions, operations, and projects launched by histeam as part of counter-terrorist campaigns and the net result of multifarious policeendeavors against terrorism.
 
 Page No.2 of 10
3.2.
 
Were these anti-terrorist operations, supposedly carried out as per “procedureestablished by law”, as envisaged in Article-21 of the Constitution of India andcannons of the Rule of Law or not?3.3.
 
Shri Vanzara should clarify as to what kind of “existential crisis” (para 10 VL)the State Govt. had faced3.4.
 
In what way police officers who derive power and authority by virtue of beingin a functional executive post as per law (CRPC, Police Acts, Gujarat Police Manual-GPM etc.) could stand “beside Govt. like a bulwark” (para 10 VL)? Please get alldetails of actions taken in this connection by him.3.5.
 
As creatures of law, is it mandatory for police officers to help Govt. facing any“existential crisis” (political or otherwise)?3.6.
 
If the answer is positive it may be clarified as to what kind of help, assistanceand support was extended by Shri Vanzara and his team to the State Govt. to tideover the crisis? Pinpointed and threadbare details should be sought.3.7.
 
What kind of help and support was expected by arrested police officers (para11 VL) from the Govt. within the framework of law? This point is relevant in the lightof legal position of the State Govt. being complainant / plaintiff, as per law in all casesregistered, investigated, and charge-sheeted, even if govt. servants are the accusedpersons.3.8.
 
Did not Shri Vanzara know that any informal or formal help from State Govt. toaccused persons, not permitted by law and administrative regulations, would betreated as acts punishable under various sections enumerated in chapter-XI of IndianPenal Code (IPC)-offences against public justice, particularly under sections 202, 203,204, 217, 218, and 219 etc.(para 12 VL).3.9.
 
In para 12 VL it is mentioned that the State Govt. “has been clandestinelymaking all efforts to keep me and my officers in jail”. Information on these illegal andunethical efforts by the Govt. should be provided by Shri Vanzara.3.10.
 
With reference to para 14 VL, Shri Vanzara should clarify as to whether he andother accused did ask for legal assistance, from State Govt., on the ground that thealleged fake encounters were committed in pursuance of legal duties by the accusedpersons? If such a request was made what was the response of the Govt.? Pleaseprovide all details.3.11.
 
What action was taken by the State Govt. to get bails (para 14 VL) to Shri M. N.Dinesh and Shri Narendra Amin cancelled?3.12.
 
What are “the legal and political intrigues, machinations and maneuverings of Shri Amitbhai Shah” (para 15 VL) for getting trials of Shohrabuddin and Tulsiram casestransferred out of the state of Gujarat?3.13.
 
What are the specific acts, covert or overt, towards “completely mismanaging asensitive dept. like police” done by Shri Amitbhai Shah? (para 18 VL).
 
 Page No.3 of 10
3.14.
 
What are the instances of Shri Amitbhai Shah’s “policy of divide and rulecoupled with equally dirty policy of use the officers and throw them by deliberatelyspreading disinformations about them, whereby he succeeded in creating ‘crisis of confidence’ among senior officers on one hand and the govt. on the other”? (para 18VL).3.15.
 
What are the specific facts and information about Shri Amitbhai Shah’s policyfor destroying “the command and control mechanism of Gujarat police” (para 18 VL).3.16.
 
Did Shri Amitbhai Shah allow undue accessibility to chosen police officers of different ranks violating the discipline and order of the vertical hierarchy in policedept.? (para 18 VL) If so provide data on specific instances.3.17.
 
Indicate the instances and events regarding Gujarat State becoming the“yadavasthali of fratricidal police war” (para 19 VL)3.18.
 
What is the criterion, according to Shri Vanzara for deeming or ranking a policeofficer as “patriotic police officer”? (para 19 VL)3.19.
 
Is it not the mandatory duty of police officers “to expose-the information onreal culprits behind encounter cases by calling them spade a spade” (para 21 VL).3.20.
 
Should a govt. servant, who transforms himself from the status of an ordinarycitizen to that of a govt. functionary, by virtue of his oath of allegiance to theConstitution of India, at the time of appointment, be motivated, guided andauthorized by holy scriptures and exhortations by Gurus/Holy men or by thestipulations of laws of the Nation? (para21VL)3.21.
 
Does the extra judicial confession by Shri Vanzara that police officersperformed their duties “in compliance of the conscious policy of this govt.” (para 22VL) indicate that fake encounters were planned, organized, and perpetrated oninnocent persons in pursuit of State Govt. policy of organizing extra judicial killings? If so, is it mandatory for a govt. servant to comply with the illegal, unethical, andimproper policy and instructions of the govt.? (I had even openly disobeyed theillegal written orders of DGP Shri Chakravarti for not reporting about contents of acommunally objectionable speech by the Chief Minister Shri Narandra Modi in Sept2002 to the National Commission for minorities-documentary evidence is available).3.22.
 
Is there any evidence accepted by judiciary (in verdicts) confirming theobservation of Shri Vanzara (para 23 VL) that Pakistan based terror outfits were trying“to convert Gujarat into another Kashmir”? What are the specific facts in support of this observation?3.23.
 
Could Shri Vanzara and his staff collect information about terrorist network of persons killed in fake encounters, viz their ideological and material resource persons,bosses of operations, communication channels, sanctuaries, shelters, links with anti-nationals within and outside India, source and supply of weaponry etc. before orafter their elimination? (para 24VL). Even after the arrest of a person accused inproperty offences like theft, dacoity, house breaking etc. collateral and circumstantial

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->