Accelerated Power Development and Reforms Programme

By Athena Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.

Agenda

APDP APDRP
Benefits Performance

during APDRP Shortcoming of APDRP

R-APDRP
Methodology Implementation

Support

Recommendation

Accelerated Power Development Programme

Objectives
Renovation & Modernization

Life extension Uprating of Plants Up gradation and Strengthing of Sub-transmission & Distribution Lines

Funding

90% grant & 10 % soft loan of project cost for special category 50% of the project cost for Non-special category

APDRP

Objectives

Reduction of AT & C losses Bring commercial viability Reduce outages & interruptions Increase consumer satisfaction

Funding

Investment component- same as APDP Incentive component- 50% of cach loss reduction

Expected benefits

Reduction of AT & C losses from 60% to 15%

Improvement in revenue realization

Avoiding investment by reducing technical losses

Use of subsidy amount in other sector

Eligibility criteria for APDRP assistance

Primary Conditions

Restructuring of SEB/ Power Deptt. Constitution and operationalization of SERC

Secondary

Adoption of multi-year tariff 100% metering up to 11kv feeders Energy accounting and auditing 100% metering of non-agriculture consumers Establishments of consumer care centers

Performance of Discoms during APDRP

Billing Efficiency
100 80
In %

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

60 40 20 0
Eastern N-E Northern Southern Western All India
Source: MoP

Performance of Discoms during APDRP

AT & C losses
70 60
Losses (in %)
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

50 40 30 20 10 0
Eastern N-E Northern Southern Western All India

Source: MoP

Performance of Discoms during APDRP

Collection Efficiency
120 100 80
in %

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

60 40 20 0
Eastern N-E Northern Southern Western All India

Source: MoP

Performance of Discoms during APDRP

Profit without subsidy (in Cr.)

Region 2003-04
-1683
-1081 -5645 -5396 -3750 -17555

2004-05
-2188
-1518 -12679 -5030 -2065 -23480

2005-06
-2407
-601 -9483 -5127 -2113 -19731
Source: PFC

Eastern
N-E Northern Southern Western All India

Shortcomings of APDRP

Delay in transfer of funds Lack of mechanism of monitoring of funds project wise Unrealistic DPRs No guidelines for submission of utilization certificate Increase in price of equipment of materials Lackness in project planning, management and implementation,641 project being approved in 9 meetings Industry could not meet demand Lack of project management skills Wrong prioritization of work Employees resistance to outsource

R-APDRP

Objectives

Establishment of base-line data Adoption of IT To cover urban areas with population more than 30000

Components

Part A- IT implementation Part B- Renovation and modernization

Funding mechanism

Total Programme size is about Rs 50,000 Cr

GoI Grant component for Part-A Rs.10,000 Cr (Max) GoI Grant component for Part-B Rs.20,000 Cr (Max) PFC/REC Loan for Part-B Rs.20,000 Cr (Min)

GoI will provide 100% Loan for part A of the schemes including IT applications. GoI will provide 25% Loan for Part B of the schemes (90% for special category States). The counter part funding will be done by PFC / REC upto 75%

Methodology

Implementation of SCADA,DMS
Implementation of DSS

Integration of MIS/GIS/ERP
Enhancement of CRM

Implementation Support

Nodal Agency
Process Consultants

IT-Consultants
IT implementing agencies

Third Party Independent Evaluation Agency (TPIEA)

Nodal Agency

It will provide single window service

It will coordinate with CEA and various consultants Responsibility of implementation Certification of work completion Recommendation for project sanction Inspection of works

Process Consultants

Finalization of SRS
Empanelment of IT consultants for part A

Empanelment of IT implementing agenc for part A

Short listing and appointment of TPIEA

IT-Consultant

Assisting the utilities

IT mapping

Segregation of feeders
Provision for customer satisfaction

Base line data collection system

TPIEAs

Establishing base line data (initial loss level)

Annual project wise verification

Assessment of claims for conversion of loan into grant for part A and part B
Submission of periodic reports

Recommendations

Release of funds directly to implementing agency

More stress on IT initiatives

Proper flow of funds with progress of work

Realistic target

A panel at national level particularly for Discoms