• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
\u25ba
INDEX
FULL SCREEN
Between Christianity and the
Libertarian Le\ue000t: How Wide the Gap?
by Marc B. Young
Although it might make a decent news story in some media

outlets, an article about the ways in which Christians and secular radicals collaborate, on a variety o\ue001 issues, prob- ably doesn\u2019t need to take up space in a publication read

primarily by activists. A\ue000ter all, every le\ue000tist knows that
anarchists, communists, greens, socialists and Christians
(at least Catholics, Quakers and members o\ue000 \u2018main-stream\u2019
Protestant denominations) regularly end up on the same
side o\ue001 rallies against, \ue001or example, war and in support o\ue001
immigrants. At least some points o\ue000 tactical agreement are
simply taken \ue001or granted between these players and don\u2019t
make \ue000or that interesting a conversation. What is more

interesting perhaps is the exploration o\ue001 why these areas o\ue001 tactical agreement are possible a\ue001ter all, which is really an enquiry into what the movement \ue001ounded by Jesus and

THE
Mor mon
Worker
\u201cI Teach Them Correct Principles and They Govern Themselves\u201d \u2013joseph smith
Issue 5
November 2008
\u25a0Between Christianity and the Libertarian Le\ue001t:
How Wide the Gap?by Marc B. Young

\u25a0Obedience to Authorityby Tariq Khan
\u25a0Why Progressives Should Vote Naderby Ashley Sanders
\u25a0A Vietnam Vet\u2019s Vision o\ue001 Peaceby Terry Leichner
\u25a0\u201cUn-terri\ue000ed Jefersonian Democrats\u201d: Part I

by Matthew Thomas
\u25a0Letter \ue001rom South Baghdad, May 2008by Sgt. Jay Dawkins
\u25a0Observations \ue001rom the 2008 Democratic
National Conventionby Spencer Kingman
\u25a0The Beehive and the Steel Mill:
Rethinking the Protestant Work Ethicby Jason Brown
\u25a0The DNC Convention in the Street/Jail/Garden/Home
by Tristan Call
\u25a0Jesus Asked Us to Love Our Enemies: Learning to
be a Christian in Occupied Palestineby Cliff Burton
\u25a0Co nt r i b u to r s
\u25a0N av i g at i o n
\u25baHold your mouse cursor on the name of an author to see
a brief bio and an introduction to his or her article
\u25baClick on the name of an article to go there
\u25ba
INDEX
FULL SCREEN
2
The Mormon Worker\u25c6Issue 5
\u25ba
his closest colleagues \u2013 and not St. Augustine or Henry
VIII \u2013 has to say about human liberation.
But secular radicals, generally happy to have church-
types at their actions, tend not to want to explore this route.

They are at best ba\ue001fed by religiosity, in a condescending sort o\ue001 way, and at worst nauseated by it, convinced it has no place in a rational program. They sense that the Chris-

tian \ue000acet o\ue000 those believers who are on \u2018their side\u2019 o\ue000 most
current issues is precisely those persons\u2019 most superfu-
ous aspect, that is, unnecessary to their commitment to
egalitarianism and liberation \u2013 and this idea is obviously
rein\ue000orced by the \ue000act that so many other individuals, some

o\ue001 whom run the country, go around linking their Christi- anity to right-wing politics. The Jesus movement, secular radicals o\ue001ten think, can, like all religions, be shaken out

to justi\ue000y any social posture. So let\u2019s not go there, as North
Americans say these days. And what\u2019s to be gained, wonder

these radicals, that\u2019s worth the potential discom\ue001ort that occurs when religious belie\ue001s are made explicit and then challenged?

Some insights, possibly. Men and women on the radi- cal le\ue001t tend not to be absolute relativists (or nihilists) o\ue001 the sort who hold that all opinions have equal merit; on

the contrary, they insist that di\ue000\ue000erent interpretations o\ue000
historical phenomena are either more or less correct \u2013 and

that di\ue001\ue001erent points o\ue001 view and di\ue001\ue001erent actions are ei- ther more or less ethical. Certainly there are le\ue001t-wingers who claim to be Christians and right-wingers who do the same. Precisely because this is so, we will, in this article,

A Note to Our Readers

The Mormon Worker is an independent newspaper/jour- nal devoted to Mormonism and radical politics. It is pub- lished by members o\ue001 the LDS Church. The paper is mod- eled a\ue001ter the legendary Catholic Worker which has been in publication \ue001or over seventy years.

The primary objective o\ue001 The Mormon Worker is to mean- ing\ue001ully connect core ideas o\ue001 Mormon theology with a host o\ue001 political, economic, ecological, philosophical, and social topics.

Although most contributors o\ue001 The Mormon Worker are members o\ue001 the LDS church, some are not, and we accept submissions \ue001rom people o\ue001 varying secular and religious backgrounds.

The opinions in The Mormon Worker are not the o\ue001\ue000cial
view o\ue001 The Church o\ue001 Jesus Christ o\ue001 Latter-day Saints.
In solidarity,
The Mormon Worker
THE MORMON WORKER
140 West Oak Circle
Woodland Hills, UT 84653
Subscribe to our print edition:
www.themormonworker.org
themormonworker@gmail.com
http://themormonworker.wordpress.com
Between Christianity and the Libertarian Left: How Wide the Gap?
\u25ba
INDEX
FULL SCREEN
3
The Mormon Worker\u25c6Issue 5
\u25ba
proceed on the assumption that one o\ue000 the Christian camps
is wrong about their man. Either Jesus was primarily a

prophet o\ue001 domination and mass passivity, o\ue001\ue001ering conso- lation to the destitute in some world beyond death, or he proclaimed solidarity and sustenance \ue001or all in this world. I\ue001 the \ue001ormer is true (or truer), then radicals\u2019 disdain \ue001or the Good News is sensible enough. But i\ue001 the latter is the case, an open-minded review o\ue001 what Jesus and the early

Christians proclaimed could provide secular radicals with
ethical and other insights they have perhaps undervalued.
Or it could, practically and strategically speaking, help
promote an alliance between some Christians (genuine
ones?) and certain secular activists that reaches \ue000urther
than many think possible. Which in turn could prove a
minor boon \ue001or American radicals especially, citizens and
residents o\ue000 a country where polls show most people desire
more equality and justice, are inheritors o\ue001 a tradition o\ue001
mistrust toward government and proclaim their belie\ue001 in
God.1 At the very least, secular activists could improve the
way they address believers.
For radical Christians, an enterprise o\ue000 the sort pro-

posed here, even i\ue001 it tends to repeat things they already think, might help them tackle the \ue001requently heard argu- ment that \ue001aith is either not about society \u2013 it is a personal a\ue001\ue001air \u2013 or that it \ue000ts com\ue001ortably inside a liberal agenda o\ue001 political progress that John Kerry or Barack Obama might support. (Naturally, we assume that radical Christians dis- count the possibility that Pat Robertson and George Bush

\u2013 at least with their current programs and opinions \u2013 belong
in their church.) A reiteration o\ue001 atheists\u2019 critique o\ue001 \ue001aith,
something that will also arise in this piece, might also help

le\ue001tist Christians look more closely at what they believe \u2013 with an added dose o\ue001 reason, as it were. Is their \ue001aith so\ue001t and fabby? What o\ue001 it can be discarded, what saved? Can

one\u2019s religious commitment be thought through, or is there

an irreducible element o\ue001 belie\ue001 that is inevitably \u2018\ue001eeling,\u2019 that revelation that precedes, skips over or, conversely, is a sort o\ue001 condition \ue001or rationality? These are some o\ue001 the

Between Christianity and the Libertarian Left: How Wide the Gap?
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...