combating climate change and in meeting the targets fixed by the Kyoto protocol.Second, it contributes to ensure security of energy supply; and third, it will help Spainto contribute to the EU’s economic competitiveness and economic growth, an issueof the utmost importance in the financial and economic turmoil we are going throughnowadays. Indeed, our European industry in general and the big energy consumersin particular need to be able to count on reasonable, predictable and stable electricityprices to be competitive. And there again, there is a clear role to be played by thenuclear energy.Talking into account the above and if the EU wants to play a significant role in thethree pillars mentioned above, Spain’s commitment to define an adequate energy mixwhich takes into account all energy sources such as renewable and nuclear energy iscrucial. And the continuity of Garoña Nuclear Power Plant is, to our understanding,an essential part of theequation.We fully respect the principle that Member States are sovereign in determining theirenergy mix but this does not mean that these decisions do not have consequencesfor the overall of the EU. In this regard, through numerous legislations, reports andcommunications, the EU institutions have stated on several occasions the need tomaintain and promote all indigenous low CO2 emitting sources of energy within theUnion, which includes nuclear, renewables and the development of technologies forthe clean use of fossil fuels. In this framework, extending the operating licence of theGaroña NPP for ten more years, as recommended by the Spanish nuclear safetyregulatory body, seems to be for us the logical decision.We thank you in advance for the consideration we are sure you will give to thearguments put forward in this letter.
Edit HerczogStruan StevensonVladimir UrutchevMEP, PSE-HungaryMEP, Conservatives-ScotlandMEP, PPE-Bulgaria Richard Falbr Evgeni KirilovMEP, PSE(CSSD)-Czech Republic MEP, PSE-Bulgaria
Add a Comment