• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Plaintiffs must support their response with specific
1
facts, in the form of affidavits or other admissible evidence,which support that the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is theproper forum for this litigation as to each Defendant.Plaintiffs must support their response with specific
2
facts, in the form of affidavits or other admissible evidence,which demonstrate a common scheme or purpose among all of theDefendants such that it would be appropriate to try theseDefendants in a single case.IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIALISA LIBERI et al., :CIVIL ACTION:NO. 09-1898Plaintiffs,::v.::ORLY TAITZ et al.,::Defendants.:
O R D E R  AND NOW,
this
25th
day of
June, 2009,
it is hereby
ORDERED
that a rule is
ISSUED
upon Plaintiffs to show cause as towhy their Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of personaljurisdiction.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that a rule is
ISSUED
uponPlaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be severed intothree (3) or fewer cases against the following groups ofDefendants: (1) Edgar & Caren Hale, Plains Radio Network, Bar H.Farms and KPRN AM 1610; (2) Linda S. Belcher; (3) Orly Taitz,Defend Our Freedoms Foundations, Inc., Neil Sankey, SankeyInvestigations, Inc. and The Sankey Firm.
2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...