Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Raymond Dakura, A087 673 826 (BIA Sept. 13, 2013)

Raymond Dakura, A087 673 826 (BIA Sept. 13, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 513 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the denial of the respondent’s application to adjust status upon finding he checked a box claiming to be a U.S. citizen or national on a Form I-9 and presented no evidence in support of his assertion that he did so under duress. The decision was written by Member Patricia Cole.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the denial of the respondent’s application to adjust status upon finding he checked a box claiming to be a U.S. citizen or national on a Form I-9 and presented no evidence in support of his assertion that he did so under duress. The decision was written by Member Patricia Cole.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Sep 18, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Robeson Jr., Alfred
L, 
Esq11350 Random Hils Rd, Suite 800Faax, VA 22030Name:DAKURA,RAYMND
US pmn of J
Executive Oce r Immigation Review
Board of Immigton ApealsQ[ce of theClek
5107 leesburg Pik. Se 2000Fa  Chch Vn 20 I
OS/ICE ice of Chief Counsel
WAS500 12th St SW Mail Stop 5902WashingtonDC 20536A087-673-826Date of this notice: 9/13/2013
Enclosed is a copy of he Board's decson and order in the above-reerenced case.Encosre
 Mb:Cle Patricia A.
Sincerely,
D
O
c
t
Dnna CarrChf Clerk
shu Dcke
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Raymond Dakura, A087 673 826 (BIA Sept. 13, 2013)
 
{
·
U.
Department
of
Justie
Executive Oce r Immiation ReviewDecsion of the Board ofmmiion Appeals Falls 
Chh,
Vrgnia 
220
Fie:A087 673 826 -Aringon VAIn re: YMOD DU REMOAL PROCEEDGSAPPEALDate:O BEHAF OF RESPODET:Aed L Roberson, r EsqureO BHAF OF DHSCHARGE:Pea P AtiiAssistant Chef Counse otice: Sec 237a))B), I& Act[8 USC § 1227a))B)]I te Uited States in vioatio of aw 
SEP1 3 20
Sec237a))C)i) I& Act[8 USC § 227a))C)i)] oniigrnt vioated coditios of satusAPPLICATIO: Adjuset of stase respondent appeas om he Imiation udge's March 26 2012 decisionpreteitting his appication r adjuset of stats der section 245a) of he Immatio d atoaiy Act "Act) 8 USC § 255a) Te appea wi e dismissedWe review ndings of ct, icuding credibiiy deterations uder the "ceary eoneousstandrd
See
8 CFR § 1003d)3)i) We review a other issues uder a de ovo standrd
See
8 CFR § 003
I
d)3)ii) Te respondent a native d citizen of Gna, w admitted to the Uited States as a oniigrat student on January 6 2008 nd remained in this coutry oger h peitedwihout authorization  at 3; Exh  Tr at 222) He acknowedged during s herig thate sied  Empoyet Eigibiity ercation Fo Form 9) in order to obainempoent and checked the box idicating tat he was a "citize or atioa of heUnited Sttes (lJ.at Tr at 22 26 This testony s ooborated ya copy o teFo 9 he competed o Mch 8 2008 (lJ at 2 Exh 5) Te respondet coceded that he isremovabeas charged r remaining in the United States oger t autorized d vioating the tes and coditions of his sats ut sought adjustmet of satus bed o a visa petition edohs behaf by his Uted Sates citize wife  at 2 Exhs  2 Tr at 6 27-2) However the Immigrato Judge ud e respondet subject to adissibiity under secon22a)6)C)ii) of he Act 8 USC § 182a)6)C)ii) and pretermed his adsetappicatio because there is o waiver of iadmissibiity avaabe r ts ound J at 45)
See
section 212a)6)C)iii) of te Act
Cite as: Raymond Dakura, A087 673 826 (BIA Sept. 13, 2013)
 
087 673826n ode o be ed adjusen of saus he esponden bears he buden of esabshnha he s adssbe
See
8 CFR § 240d)
Mater of Almaa
24 l&N Dec 77773BI200)
Mater of YG
20 I&N Dec 74 77 BI 4) eqn he esponden oesabsh hs adssb  he puposes of obann adjsen of saus) Unde secon22a)6)C))of he c he esponden s nadssbe f he fasey epesened hsef o beUned Saes czen  y ppose o bene unde he c o any ohe fedea o sae awOn appea he esponden anans ha he Iaon Jude eed n ndn hnadssbebecause fase cas of Uned Saes czenshp on a Fo  are no he ye of saeens conepaed by he c oce of Appea) In addon he suess ha he Fo
1-
shod no be consdeed because  w copeed unde duress oce of ppea) Fnayhe esponden noes ha he cna chares ean o hs fase ca wee opped by heposecuon  ac of evdence oce of ppea)Becausehe esponden bes he bden of esabsh hs eby  eef d n  of hs esony indca ha he epesened he was a Uned Saes czen we dsce no ce eo n he Iaon Judes cua ndns n hs ead no do we dsaee upon de novoevew wih hs concuson ha he ca dsquaes he esponden o obann adjusen of saus IJ a 3) Conary o he esponden s asseons  aen who fasey cas UnedSaes czenshp on a Fo I s seekn a "bene nde he c
See, e.g Theodros
v.
Goale
40 F3d 36 40002 h C 2007) conn ha a fase ca o cnshp node o secue prvae epoyen s a se ca  a "puose o bene unde hec)Whe he esponden suess ha he copeed he Fo  unde duress he subed noedence n suppo of hs ca
See Mater ofRamirez-Sanchez
7 l&N Dec 03 BI 80)expannha e epesenaons of conse are no evdence)Fnay we noe ha a convcon s unecessay o supp a ndn of nadssby unde secon 22a)6)C)) of he cBased on he eon we nd ha he Imaon Jude popey concuded ha heesponden has no deonsaed adssby unde secon 22a)6)C)) of he c  fasey can Uned Saes czenshp and snce hee s no wave avaabe  his oundof nadssby he s uabe o esabsh sauo eby  adjusen of sausccodny he own ode s eneedORDER The espondens appea s dsssed2
Cite as: Raymond Dakura, A087 673 826 (BIA Sept. 13, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->