Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Southern Levant Early Bronze Age I - III: 3600 - 2350 B.C.E. Intermediate Bronze / EBA IV: 2350 - 2000 B.C.E.
Increasing social differentiation (individual and group) seen in mortuary practices Intensification of agricultural production (irrigation technology, water management, ownership, use, surplus storage and management)
Why build large walls with towers and gates around a community? Why at this point in time?
Granary at Bet Yerah
How can we relate emergence of walled towns to intensified agricultural and pastoral production? How can we trace new ideas about community, property, ownership, and obligations with the invention of walled towns?
Practice Theory and Agency Studies
body as a metaphor for society, as instrument of lived experience, and as surface of inscription inscription (Joyce 2005: 140)
Sanctuary A
Fortification walls
Street
West Gate
Fortification Walls
Numeira houses
Winnowing / threshing area
Residential Places
Reconstruction of terraced residential area, Bab edhedh- Dhra Dhra` `
Cresset
Seal Impression
Cresset
Mudbrick courtyard floor near altar Sanctuary A, Bab edhedh - Dhra Dhra
Irrigated fields
Deflection wall
Fortification systems
Administrative complexes
Irrigation systems
New Walled Towns and New Viewscapes Staple Finance Economy Collective Labor and Civic Projects Property, Ownership, and Access
EB Mortuary Evidence
Excavations 1965, 1967 (P. Lapp); survey/excavations 1973-1983, 1989-90 (W. Rast and T. Schaub Schaub); ); mapping 2004 (T. Schaub and M. Chesson) Early Bronze Age sites on the southeastern Dead Sea Plain (c. 3150 - 2000 bce uncal uncal) ) 2 walled town sites (Bab (Bab edhDhra Dhra and Numeira Numeira) ) 4 cemeteries (Bab (Bab edh-Dhra edh-Dhra, Feifa, Feifa , Safi/Naqa Safi/Naqa, , Kh Kh. . Khanazir Khanazir) ) Publication ongoing: Numeira is current focus
EB IA
EB IA: c. 3150-3050 bce EB IB / early II: c. 3050-2900 bce EB II / III: c. 2900-2300 bce EB IV: c 2300-2000 bce Shaft tombs and campsites at Bab edhedhDhra`; Dhra `; cist tombs at Feifa and Safi Safi/ /Naqa Village, shaft tombs, circular Ch. Houses at Bab edhedh-Dhra Dhra`; `; cist, slab tombs at Safi Safi/ / Naqa Walled town, charnel houses at Bab edhedhDhra`; Dhra `; walled town at Numeira Village, shaft tombs at Bab edhedh- Dhra Dhra`; `; stone shaft tombs at Khanazir
EB II / III
EB IV
Shifting Settlement and Mortuary Practices: Social Memory, Identity, and Changing Ideas about Community and Place
Tomb A78W
EB IA Campsites >> Shaft or Cist Tombs EBIB / II Village >> Slab tombs, Circular Charnel Houses
Shaft tombs: 1-5 chambers per shaft MNI: 5-25 individuals Secondary practices: skeletal elements sorted, placed on matting Ceramic and stone vessels placed to right of entrance Beads and other goods placed in and amongst vessels
Charnel House A4
Sex Unknown
Age Prenatal Infants Children Adolescents Adults Adolescents Adults Adolescents Adults
Total 5 57 97 16 36 1 77 4 80 373
% 1.3% 15.3% 26.0% 4.3% 9.7% 0.3% 20.6% 1.1% 21.4% 100.0%
Transitional ritual landscapes: Above and Below Primary and secondary burials
Average male/female heights: 164 cm/154 cm High infant mortality: 47% deaths before 15 yo Trauma uncommon Infectious diseases: TB (n=2) and brucellosis (n=4)
Charnel Houses at Bab edhedh- Dhra`: Dhra`: Libraries of the Dead Visible & Visitable Secondary Mortuary Ceremonies Emphasis on Membership and Collective
Smaller Charnel Houses Larger Charnel Houses
41-200
46-783
Pendants: shell, bone, stone and carnelian Beads: metal, ostrich egg, faience, alabaster, carnelian, lapis, crystal, calcite, shell, stone, bone, and gold
EBA Transformations: Durability, Visibility, and Place made-to-order made-to-order body libraries for groups Visible and visitable Differing access to resources represented in grave goods by charnel house Secondary mortuary rituals (until final use of A22) Reshaping of landscape and making different kind of Place
Larger charnel houses contain larger MNI, greater numbers and types of local and non-local goods Tendency >> evidence for social differentiation of groups with fluid border
Change in living places accompanied by change in places for the dead Shifts between visible (aboveground) and less visible (subterranean) burial contexts Moderately increasing social differentiation with invention of towns (group and individual scales) Membership in groups tied to where you are buried (kinship in EB IA contexts) In some ways, health of EB IIIII town dwellers decreases (both male and female) MANY QUESTIONS LEFT!
How can we relate emergence of walled towns to intensified agricultural and pastoral production? How can we trace new ideas about community, property, ownership, and obligations with the invention of walled towns?
Look to connections in the land
How are these relationships inscribed on the physical and social landscapes?
Which and how many human and material resources do you / your group members claim or control?
Thanks to Tom Schaub and Walt Rast Bob Chapman, Roger Matthews, Wendy Matthews, Rafi Greenberg, David Ilan, Ilan, Rosemary Joyce, Susan Kus, Kus, and Ian Kuijt