You are on page 1of 3

National Infrastructure Protection Plan

Education Facilities Subsector


Homeland Security Presidential Directive 7 identified 17 critical infrastructure and key resources
(CI/KR) sectors and designated Federal Government Sector-Specific Agencies (SSAs) for each of
the sectors. Each sector is responsible for developing and submitting a Sector-Specific Plan (SSP)
and sector-level performance feedback to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The SSAs
are also responsible for collaborating with security partners and encouraging the development
of appropriate information-sharing within the sector. DHS has recognized the Department of
Education’s (ED) Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (OSDFS) as the lead for Education Facilities
(EF), a subsector of the Government Facilities Sector. In this role, EF coordinates with Federal and
non-Federal security partners to help address risk management for the subsector.

Subsector Overview All subsector CI/KR protective efforts are designed to


Education Facilities refers to prekindergarten (preK) and support the EF subsector’s overall vision: “That all schools
all K-12 through post-secondary public, private, and and universities are ready to prevent-mitigate, prepare for,
proprietary education facilities. As the SSA for EF, the respond to, and recover from all hazards, natural or man-
Department of Education’s Office of Safe and Drug-Free made, by having a comprehensive, all-hazards plan based on
Schools helps to address CI/KR protective efforts in the the four phases or key principles of emergency management
subsector and works closely with the DHS Federal Protective to enhance school safety, to minimize disruption, and to
Service, the overall lead for the Government Facilities Sector. ensure continuity of the learning environment.”
EF assets and systems vary dramatically—from preK to
colleges and universities, from smaller schools housing less Subsector Partnerships
than a hundred students to large schools housing several OSDFS builds on existing school and university emergency
thousand students. EF also includes campus grounds and management efforts and continues to work with DHS and
dormitories, increasing the number of facilities and the level a host of partners at the Federal, State, local, Territorial,
of complexity and challenge to risk mitigation. and tribal level to provide tools and information regarding
emergency management to the education community. OSDFS
is directly involved in emergency management issues for
schools through its Readiness and Emergency Management for community that could be improved, and local assessment data
Schools (REMS) discretionary grant program (formerly known that could help schools prioritize risks.
as the Emergency Response and Crisis Management, ERCM, EF recognizes that the local communities, individual States, or
program). In addition, ED works closely with the Department private owners have ultimate responsibility for protection of the
of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Disease Control assets in the EF subsector, but face challenges as well. Schools
and Prevention (CDC) and other Federal, State, and local are often overlooked when communities are designing their
governments and Territories, to address pandemic influenza emergency management plans and large metropolitan areas
planning efforts for preK through universities, including are often served by multiple school districts, but few of those
collaboration on pandemic checklists, guidelines, and tools for districts have regional plans that coordinate activities among the
parents, educators and communities. various school districts and jurisdictions of first responders.
Comprehensive, all-hazards emergency management plans can
help mitigate risk to EF’s human (students and staff/faculty), ED’s Emergency Management Programs and Materials
and physical (the facilities and associated structures) assets. Due ED’s emergency management programs, initiatives, and
to the uniqueness of the subsector, EF utilizes a mix of public materials are designed to help schools improve and refine
and private school and university associations and organizations, school emergency management plans. Such programs work to
and school and university emergency management and security mitigate risk to the subsector’s human and physical assets. ED’s
specialists, to achieve representative stakeholder outreach. priority programs and support for the EF subsector include:
A comprehensive approach to EF CI/KR protection includes • A discretionary grant program (REMS) to help school
protective efforts for a variety of cross-sector assets (for districts improve and refine emergency management plans;
example, stadiums and arenas and school transportation, such • A grant program to help local educational agencies recover
as school buses). This CI/KR protection approach requires from a violent or traumatic incident, Project School
coordination across multiple sectors responsible for these Emergency Response to Violence (SERV);
efforts. EF is working with these sectors so that the various areas
• Training for both emergency management grantees and
impacting the subsector are addressed.
non-grantees;
CI/KR Protection and Challenges • A Technical Assistance Center to assist grantees and
For the EF subsector, CI/KR protection refers to comprehensive non-grantees of any education level represented in the
all-hazards emergency management plans that are based on enhancement of school emergency management plans
the four phases or key principles of emergency management through provision of preparedness resources including
(prevention-mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery). publications featuring topics such as the National
Comprehensive plans are practiced and updated regularly, Incident Management System, lessons learned as a result
coordinated with appropriate State and local partners, and of actual incidents, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
developed in close collaboration with first responders and the Administration all-hazards weather radios, how to create
community. They include written plans for an infectious disease “go-kits”; and
outbreak, and incorporate measures to address special needs • Pandemic preparedness resources through collaboration
students and staff. While most schools and school districts with the CDC and other partners, providing support
may have emergency management plans, local educational through checklists, guidelines, and tools for education
agencies often may not have the capacity necessary to develop facilities; preK-higher education, parents, and communities
comprehensive all-hazards emergency management plans in pandemic influenza preparedness.
on their own. When these plans do exist, there is variability
in whether or not the plans are comprehensive, practiced
regularly, or written in collaboration with the local community.
There are multiple challenges related to CI/KR protection for
education facilities. The subsector includes millions of students,
faculty, and staff that are housed in 130,755 U.S. public and
private K-12 and higher education facilities. Therefore, given
the disparity between a facility’s population, physical size,
location, and function, the improvement and refinement For questions or more information, please contact
of comprehensive plans require each facility to consider NIPP@dhs.gov or visit www.dhs.gov/nipp.
its uniqueness while still adhering to the key principles of
emergency management. Further, a comprehensive, all-hazards
approach to emergency management works to ensure that
emergency management plans take into account any procedures
and processes already in place within the school or local
About School Safety Partners  
This document is presented by School Safety Partners as part of a free online course on school safety. School 
Safety Partners (www.SchoolSafetyPartners.org) is dedicated to creating long‐term funding partnerships to 
support school safety best practices. We are a facilitator of joint research projects, reaching out to the general 
public as well as stakeholders in the public, private, non‐profit, and academic sectors. Since our start in January, 
2008, our projects have addressed the legislative, training, compliance, funding, and public awareness sides of 
school safety. Here are some highlights: 

1. We created a reference library documenting all aspects of Colorado Senate Bill 08‐181, a first‐of‐its‐kind 
measure introduced by Senator Tom Wiens to modernize emergency planning in schools, so students, 
teachers, and first responders can act fast in an emergency. 

2. For the 10th anniversary of the Columbine High School tragedy, we produced the national media event, 
"Colorado Rising," focusing on the future of school safety in America, and our guests and speakers were 
covered by NBC‐TV, CNN, NPR, FOX, Oprah Radio, Channel One News, Associated Press, Reuters, the 
Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, German Public Radio, the Guardian, and dozens of 
other news sources.   

3. We assisted in the 2008 Symposium and the 2009 Symposium on the Prevention of School Violence at 
Johnson & Wales University, and in the tabletop exercises on interoperable communications conducted 
for these events by one of our partners, SchoolSAFE Communications (www.SchoolSAFEcom.org). 

4. We produced over 4 hours of video footage, with 2 video crews, covering a full‐scale active shooter and 
multi‐hazard school exercise that involved 18 agencies and over 1,200 persons, and tested interoperable 
communications in several school‐related settings. 

5. We co‐created the School Response Framework Fund in support of the National Incident Managment 
System (NIMS) and to help Colorado schools become NIMS‐compliant as quickly as possible. 

6. We also developed a virtual campus that schools can use as an online training site for their safety 
teams, and as an action center where schools can build strong relationships with community partners, 
or local responders. 

7. We have developed with ABC‐TV a nationwide community awareness campaign, giving recognition to 
educators as first responders, and calling for the creation of public‐private partnerships to make school 
safety sustainable in communities across America. 

8. We have also developed with the creators of the feature motion picture, "April Showers," the 
educational and school safety materials to accompany the film as it is released to the worldwide 
educational market.  

9. Other states have shown an interest in what we have done in Colorado about school crisis response, and 
for them we have designed webinars and information kits about improving school safety legislation and 
finding long‐term funding solutions. 

We hope that you find our information useful and our contacts productive. We invite you to explore all parts of 
our website, and also share with us your views, experiences, lessons learned, best practices, and innovations. 
Please visit us at www.SchoolSafetyPartners.org and register online in order to access all of our sections. 
Registration is free. 

You might also like