EDITORIAL
D I S C L A I M E R D I S C L A I M E R D I S C L A I M E R D I S C L A I M E R
Different opinions are encourage to stimulatemember input and involvement.
SULYAPINOY’
srole is to provide information that permits
FEWA
members to develop informed opinions onsubjects that will affect their status as migrantworkers and, in some instances, their personallives. FEWA does not hold itself responsible for statements made by any contributor. Statementsor opinions expressed in SULYAPINOY reflect theviews of the author(s) and not the official policy of FEWA unless so stated.
For Comments, Suggestions, Contributions & Advertisements
Please submit them to our website or to the following emails below:
All Staff:
editorialstaff@sulyapinoy.org
or
sulyap.editorialstaff@gmail.com
* SULYAPINOY
observes the Philippine Press Code of Ethics .
*
We reserve the right to refuse any submission we deem does not meet our policies and guidelines.
* SULYAPINOY
is still in need of writers and community correspondents. Aspirants may email theEditorial Staff for more details.
Thank you for your time and interest!
SULYAPINOY Office Address:
115-9 Songbuk-gu, Songbuk 1 dong, Songbuk Villa, Seoul, Korea 136-020
FEWA Office Address & SULYAPINOY Distribution Center:
Inside WOORI BANK, Hyehwa-dong Branch, Jongno-gu, Seoul
EDITORIAL STAFF
Editor-in-Chief:
Edward A. Castro
Managing Editor:
Alden C. Balgos
Opinion Editor:
Rebenson B. Reca
ñ
a
News Editor:
Edward A. Castro
Literary Editor:
Amie Sison
Cartoonist:
Alden C. Balgos
Photojournalist:
Felix S. Ferrer
Layout Artist:
ß
L
ЏħΣ
Circulation Managers:
Teofilo C. Camo
;
Alwyin A. Casi
ñ
o
;
Marcelino M. Serde
ñ
a III
Community Correspondents:
Billy Vela (Ansan); Anthony Carl Dacones (Kasan)Valentino de Guzman (Gimhae, Busan); Maria Elena Famor (Ulsan)
Contributor/s:
&
Mary Ann Octavio (Literary), the Philippine Embassy POLO
Adviser:
Ma. Regina P. Arquiza
Editorial Consultant:
Elizer M. Pe
ñ
aranda
BOARD OF PUBLICATION
Chairman:
Rebenson B. Reca
ñ
a
V-Chairman:
Marcelino M. Serde
ñ
a III
Secretary:
Rodney Queman
Board of Publication in:
Outreach, Recreation and Religious Program:
Alden C. Balgos
SULYAPINOY Website Development and Maintenance:
Dondave Jabay
Sponsorship & Promotions Program:
Annabelle Lopez
Trainings & Workshop:
Ehd G. Villarta Jr.
Board Consultants:
Fr. Alvin B. Parantar, MSP; Prof. Emely Dicolen-Abagat, Ph.D.
FEWA President:
Sofonias N. Paragsa
w ww ww ww ww ww w....s ss su uu ul ll ly yy ya aa ap pp pi ii in nn no oo oy yy y....o oo or rr rg gg g
3
P
resident Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, after visitingthe Filipino Community here last month, and after meeting with South Korean President Lee Myung Bakfor bilateral talks in improving both our countries'partneship, also followed by signing of several govern-ment-to-government MOU's, her return in thePhilippines was what her aides say was another
“
overwhelming success
”
state visit. However seem-ingly sounds like encouraging, we beg to differ.
One of the several MOU's signed was that of a newlabor deal on Employment Permit System (EPS).Despite the renewal of the pact, salient issues regard-ing the
“
hiring permit program
”
are still left uncertainand questionable. Pre-mature cancellation of contracts,denial of medical and financial benefits, discriminationand basic rights violations, as well as removal of workers' free food and accommodation allowances are just few of the many predicaments of OFWs plight.
It was certainly reassuring to discern that Presidents Arroyo and Lee, as well as both RP and ROK's labor bureaus headed by DOLE Secretary Roque and Labor Minister Lee respectively, vowed once again- tocontinually hold working level consultations in improv-ing the EPS side-by-side with other sending countriesof the said permit program. Equally relieving, the twolabor chiefs also signed an MOU on Labor andManpower Development which provides, amongothers, for the training of workers onsite to better pre-pare them for their eventual return to the Philippines.
Still, this is no time to be a roaring bull, although somedegree of optimism may be just the ticket. Frustratinglyabsent in their rhetoric however, is a clear solution asto how they would deal and downsize these labor andmigration problems. With the renewal of the EPS MOU,around 8,000 Filipino hopefuls are expected to enter and work in Korea every year for the next three (3)years. What's truly worrisome is - if the irregularitiesof the labor program are left unsolved, it will likelymake these
“
hopefuls
”
susceptible to similar miseryand frustrations that many of the OFWs here arealready battling.
After the most feared abolition of worker's food andaccommodation benefits, another reason for our pessimism is the Ministry of Labor
'
s
“
Directions for Improving the Minimum Wage Program.
”
We areforced to wonder whether it really is the ministryresponsible for policy pertaining to working people.Rather, we get the feeling that it has lowered itself tobeing some company’s labor management depart-ment. Many workers are facing a crisis of survival inthis unprecedented economic cold front. To say thatyou are going to cut the minimum wage by half atsuch a time instead of thinking about ways tosupport working people is like this administrationcutting out the liver of a flea and using it to fatten therich.
In October, during the Korea National Assembly’syearly review of government affairs, Labor Minister Lee hinted that he would be meddling with theminimum wage when he declared that it
“
has risentoo steeply compared to South Korea's economiclevel.
”
The minimum wage was created to guaranteea minimum of a livelihood for low-paid workingpeople. Currently, Korea’s minimum wage is 4,000won an hour. With that you earn 904,000 won amonth, if you work all 44 hours a week and even get
“
weekly holiday
”
pay for working on Saturdays. If thisplan pushes through and the minimum wage isreduced to a certain extent, is it best still to work andearn 452,000 won monthly in a country dubbed asthe world's seventh largest economy?
It seems difficult to expect that the context of labor migration will reform itself on its own. Judging fromwhat has been revealed so far, it is hard to guaranteethat despite the renewal of the labor agreement,OFWs’ ordeal will get better. At this point, it may be toosoon for anyone to be talking of success. Too muchoptimism could send wrong signals to both aspiringoverseas workers in the Philippines and the Filipinolabor community here, thus hampering the labor bureau's efforts in resolving the issues and to further improve the permit program.
In the end, the choice is both our government’s. Wehope that both DOLE and MOL decide wisely to ration-ally resolve the issues through constant dialogue withthe labor sector and actively involving the migrantworkers themselves in consultations and decisionmaking, as it will help secure its goals of effective labor management and the advancement of the hiringsystem, otherwise, choosing a hard line stance will onlybe an invitation to disaster. Both must do its best toensure that the deal goes through and that we haverightful reasons to celebrate.
Leave a Comment
I would like to CONGRATULATE the SULYAPINOY editorial staff.. you have proven once more...