• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Origin of the Seventh Day Adventist ReformMovement
From the beginning, the Seventh-day Adventist denomination announced its standas follows: "We, the undersigned, hereby associate ourselves together as a church,taking the name of Seventh-day Adventists, covenanting to keep the commandmentsof God, and the faith of Jesus."J. Loughborough: The Great Second Advent Movement, p. 352.The same position was confirmed by the Seventh-day Adventist Church in the UnitedStates during the American Civil War. They declared in 1864:"The denomination of Christians calling themselves Seventh-day Adventists, takingthe Bible as their rule of faith and practice, are unanimous in their views that itsteachings are contrary to the spirit and practice of war; hence, they have ever beenconscientiously opposed to bearing arms. If there is any portion of the Bible whichwe, as a people, can point to more than any other as our creed, it is the law of theten commandments, which we regard as the supreme law, and each precept of which we take in its most obvious and literal import. The fourth of thesecommandments requires cessation from labor on the seventh day of the week, thesixth prohibits the taking of life, neither of which, in our view, could be observed whiledoing military duty. Our practice has uniformly been consistent with these principles.Hence, our people have not felt free to enlist into the service. In none of our denominational publications have we advocated or encouraged the practice of bearing arms, and, when drafted, rather than violate our principles, we have beencontent to pay, and assist each other in paying, the $300 commutation money."F. M. Wilcox: Seventh-day Adventists in Time of War, p. 58.In 1865, the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists reaffirmed their originalstand:"Resolved that we recognize civil government as ordained of God, that order, justice,and quiet may be maintained in the land; and that the people of God may lead quietand peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty. In accordance with this fact weacknowledge the justice of rendering tribute, custom, honor, and reverence to thecivil power, as enjoined in the New Testament. While we thus cheerfully render toCaesar the things which the Scriptures show to be his, we are compelled to declineall participation in acts of war and bloodshed as being inconsistent with the dutiesenjoined upon us by our divine Master toward our enemies and toward all mankind."The Review and Herald, May 23, 1865.As this position of total obedience to the commandments of God was not practicedduring World War I (1914-1918), a great crisis came upon the Seventh-day AdventistChurch. While 98% of the members decided to obey the instruction of the officers of the denomination, taking part in the war, 2% decided to remain faithful to the law of God, upholding the original position, as taught and practiced up to that time. Thesefaithful believers were disfellowshipped from the Seventh-day Adventist Church inEurope because they chose to uphold the church's original position in regard tokeeping the Law of God (all Ten Commandments).
Page 1 of 8
 
In a booklet published by the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Germany, theyannounced the following change:"In all that we have said we have shown that the Bible teaches, firstly, that takingpart in the war is no transgression of the sixth commandment, likewise, that war service on the Sabbath is not a transgression of the fourth commandment."Protokoll, p.12.In the Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Commentary Reference Series, thefollowing explanation is given:"On the German mobilization, in August, 1914, the SDA's of that country were facedwith the necessity of making an immediate decision concerning their duty to God andcountry when called into the armed service (see Germany, V; Noncombatancy). After counseling with the few SDA leaders locally available at that time, the president of the East German Union Conference informed the German War Ministry in writing,dated Aug. 4, 1914, that conscripted SDA's would bear arms as combatants andwould render service on the Sabbath in defense of their country. . . . Admittedly, thethree SDA leaders in Germany took a stand concerning the duty of SDA's in militaryservice that was contrary to the historic stand officially maintained by thedenomination ever since the American Civil War (1861-1865)."The Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Commentary Reference Series, Vol. 10, p.1183, Edition of 1966.The Adventist leaders declared:"At the beginning of the war our organization was split into two parties. As ninety-eight percent of our membership, by searching the Bible, came to the conviction thatthey are duty-bound, by conscience, to defend the country with weapons, also onSaturdays, this position, unanimously endorsed by the leadership, was immediatelyannounced to the War Ministry. Two percent, however, did not submit to thisresolution, and therefore had to be disfellowshipped because of their unchristianconduct. These unprofitable elements set themselves up as preachers and, with littleresults, sought to make converts to their propaganda of foolish ideas. They callthemselves, falsely, preachers and Adventists. They are not; they are deceivers.When such elements receive their merited punishment, we regard it, in fact, as afavor done to us."Dresdener Neueste Nachrichten (A German newspaper), p. 3, April 12, 1918.A newspaper correspondent gave his unbiased opinion about the situation, asfollows:"Since the beginning of the war there has been a division among the Adventistpeople. During the period of the war, the majority wanted to see the fundamentalteachings set aside, by force if necessary. The others asked that the sanctification of Saturday (Sabbath) be allowed them, even in these times of stress. The opposingfaction finally brought about the disfellowshipment from the organization of thefollowers of the original principles of faith."Koelnische Zeitung (Evening Edition) September 21, 1915.
Page 2 of 8
 
In the same year, SDA leaders made another declaration, as follows:"In the beginning of the war there were some members, as there are also in other places, who did not want to take part in war service, either because of their lack of unity, or because of fanaticism. They started to spread around their foolish ideas inthe congregation by word and in writing, trying to convince others to do the same.They were admonished by the church, but because of their obstinacy they had to beput out, for they became a threat to internal and external peace."Stuttgarter Neues Tagblatt, September 26, 1918.Those disfellowshipped from the Seventh-day Adventist Church, not only inGermany but also in many other countries in Europe, had no intention of starting anew church. They were about 4,000 in number. Attempts at reconciliation with themain body were made just after the war, in 1920 and in 1922, but with no positiveresult.Therefore, as their numbers increased, the Seventh Day Adventist ReformMovement was organized as a church, separate from the the main body of Seventh-day Adventists, when representatives from different countries met at Gotha,Germany, July 14-20, 1925. It is the purpose of the Reform Movement to continuewith the original teachings and practices of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.In the General Conference Bulletin of the Seventh-day Adventists, May 13, 1913,pages 33, 34, E. G. White stated:"It will be well for us to consider what is soon to come upon the earth. This is no timefor trifling or self-seeking. If the times in which we are living fail to impress our mindsseriously, what can reach us? Do not the Scriptures call for a more pure and holywork than we have yet seen?"Men of clear understanding are needed now. God calls upon those who are willingto be controlled by the Holy Spirit to lead out in a work of thorough reformation. I seea crisis before us, and the Lord calls for His laborers to come into line. Every soulshould now stand in a position of deeper, truer consecration to God than during theyears that have passed. . . ."I have been deeply impressed by scenes that have recently passed before me inthe night season. There seemed to be a great movement—a work of revival—goingforward in many places. Our people were moving into line, responding to God's call.My brethren, the Lord is speaking to us. Shall we not heed His voice? Shall we nottrim our lamps, and act like men who look for their Lord to come? The time is onethat calls for light bearing, for action."http://www.sdarm.org/origin.htm 
Page 3 of 8
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...