A Research Roadmap for Medical and Healthcare Robotics
Motivation and Scope:
Several major societal drivers for improved health care access, affordability,quality, and personalization that can be addressed by robotic technology. Existing medical procedurescan be improved and new ones developed, to be less invasive and produce fewer side effects, resultingin faster recovery times and improved worker productivity, substantially improving both risk-benefitand cost-benefit ratios. Medical robotics is already a major success in several areas of surgery, including prostate and cardiac surgery procedures. Robots are also being used for rehabilitation and in intelligent prostheses to help people recover lost function. Tele-medicine and assistive robotics methods areaddressing the delivery of healthcare in inaccessible locations, ranging from rural areas lackingspecialist expertise to post-disaster and battlefield areas. Socially assistive robotics efforts aredeveloping affordable in-home technologies for monitoring, coaching, and motivating both cognitiveand physical exercises addressing the range of needs from prevention to rehabilitation to promotingreintegration in society. With the aging population a dominating demographic, robotics technologies are being developed toward promoting aging in place (i.e., at home), delaying the onset of dementia, and providing companionship to mitigate isolation and depression. Furthermore, robotics sensing andactivity modeling methods have the potential to play key roles in improving early screening, continualassessment, and personalized, effective, and affordable intervention and therapy. All of the above pursuits will have the effect of maintaining and
improving productivity of the workforce and increasingits size, and enabling people with disabilities, whose numbers are on the rise, to go (back) into theworkforce. Today, the US is the leader in robot-assisted surgery and socially assistive robotics for continued quality of life aimed at special-needs populations and the elderly. However, other countriesare fast followers, having already recognized both the need and the promise of such technologies.
Participants:
The workshop contributors consisted of experts in surgical robotics, prosthetics, implants,rehabilitation robotics, and socially assistive robotics, as well as representatives from industry rangingfrom large corporations to startups, and representatives from the health insurance provider community.All participants contributed insights from their communities and areas of expertise; many commoninterests and challenges were identified, informing the road mapping effort.
Workshop Findings:
The spectrum of robotic system niches in medicine and health spans a wide rangeof environments (from the operating room to the family room), user populations (from the very young tothe very old, from the infirm to the able bodied, from the typically developed to those with physicaland/or cognitive deficits), and interaction modalities (from hands-on surgery to hands-off rehabilitationcoaching). Technical challenges increase with the complexity of the environment, task, and user (dis)ability. The following problem domains were identified as those of largest predicted impact:surgery and intervention; replacement of diminished/lost function; recovery and rehabilitation; behavioral therapy; personalized care for special needs populations; and wellness and
health promotion.Those problem domains involved the following set of technological and research challenges: intuitivehuman-robot interaction and interfaces; automated understanding of human behavior; automatedunderstanding emotional and physiological state; long term adaptation to user's changing needs;quantitative diagnosis and assessment; context-appropriate guidance; image-guided intervention; highdexterity manipulation at any scale; sensor-based automated health data acquisition; and safe robot behavior. In addition, key technology deployment issues were identified, including: reliable andcontinuous operation in human environments; privacy, security, interoperability, acceptability, and trust.The lack of funding for interdisciplinary integrative projects that bring together expertise in engineering,health (and business) and develop and evaluate complete systems in human subjects studies wasidentified as the cause for a lack of critical mass of new, tested, and deployed technological innovations, products, and businesses to create an industry.
Leave a Comment