Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Thompson v. Heineman: Plaintiffs Opening Brief

Thompson v. Heineman: Plaintiffs Opening Brief

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,746|Likes:
Published by hefflinger
Plaintiffs' Opening Brief in Thompson v. Heineman, a lawsuit filed by three Nebraska landowners that argues the law (LB 1161) that fast-tracked approval of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route through Nebraska is unconstitutional.
Plaintiffs' Opening Brief in Thompson v. Heineman, a lawsuit filed by three Nebraska landowners that argues the law (LB 1161) that fast-tracked approval of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline route through Nebraska is unconstitutional.

More info:

Categories:Japanese
Published by: hefflinger on Sep 26, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/26/2014

pdf

text

original

 
1
Case No CI 12-2060 ________________________________________________________ District Court, Lancaster County, Nebraska ________________________________________________________ Randy Thompson,Susan Luebbe, andSusan DunavanPlaintiffs,vDave Heineman, Governor of Nebraska,Michael J. Linder, Director, NebraskaDepartment of Environmental Quality,andDon Stenberg, State Treasurer of NebraskaDefendants. _______________________________________Hon. Stephanie Stacy ________________________________________________________ 
Plaintiffs’
Opening Trial Brief  ________________________________________________________ September 9, 2013
th
Street, Omaha, NE 68144402-493-4100
 
i
Table of ContentsJurisdictional Statement
 
ii
Cases
 Bamford 
v
Upper Republican Nat 
 
 Resources Dist,
245 Neb 299, 512 NW2d 642 (1994) ......... 23
 Boddie v Connecticut 
, 401 US 371, 91 S Ct 780, 28 L Ed 2d 113 (1971) .................................. 22
 Boll v Dep't of Revenue, State of Neb,
247 Neb 473, 528 NW2d 300 (1995) ............................. 22
 Burlington N & Santa Fe Ry Co v Chaulk 
, 262 Neb 235, 631 NW2d 131 (2001) ...................... 19
Calabro v City of Omaha
, 247 Neb 955, 531 NW2d 541 (1995) ................................................ 12
Chambers v Lautenbaugh
, 263 Neb 920 644 NW2d 540 (2002) .............................................. 4, 7
City of Omaha v City of Elkhorn
, 276 Neb 70, 752 NW2d 137 (2008)......................................... 9
City of Omaha v Tract No 1
, 18 Neb App 247, 778 NW2d 122 (2010) ...................................... 18
Cunningham v Exon,
202 Neb 563, 276 NW2d 213 (1979) .......................................................... 7
Georgen v Department of Public Works
, 123 Neb 648, 243 NW 886 (1932) .............................. 18
Gustin v Scheele
, 250 Neb 269, 549 NW2d 135 (1996) ............................................................... 19
 Haman v Marsh
, 237 Neb 699, 467 NW2d 836 (1991).......................................................... 25, 29
 Harleysville Ins Group v Omaha Gas Appliance Co
, 278 Neb 547, 772 NW2d 88 (2009) ........... 9
 Hauserman v Stadler 
, 251 Neb 106, 554 NW2d 798 (1996).......................................................... 9
 Kiplinger v Nebraska Dept of Natural Res
, 282 Neb 237, 803 NW2d 28 (2011) ........................ 24
 Krambeck v City of Gretna,
198 Neb 608, 254 NW2d 691 (1977) ............................................... 18
 Lincoln Dairy Co
v
 Finigan,
170 Neb 777, 104 NW2d 227 (1960) ................................ 14, 22, 23
 Little v Loup River Pub Power Dist 
, 150 Neb 864, 36 NW2d 261 (1949) .................................. 18
 Michelle Hug, Henstock, Inc v City of Omaha
, 275 Neb 820, 749 NW2d 884 (2008) ............... 24
 Missouri Valley Pipe Line Co v Neely
, 124 Neb 293, 246 NW 483 (1933) .......................... 17, 18
 Myers v Nebraska Inv Council 
, 272 Neb 669, 724 NW2d 776 (2006) .......................................... 6
 Nebraska Pub Serv Comm'n v Nebraska Pub Power Dist 
, 256 Neb 479, 590 NW2d 840 (1999) ...11
 Nebraska Public Power Dist v MidAmerican Energy,
234 F3d 1032 (8th Cir 2000) .................. 10
 Paine v Savage
, 126 Me 121, 136 A 664 (1927) ......................................................................... 18
 Ponderosa Ridge LLC 
v
 Banner County,
250 Neb 944, 554 NW2d 151 (1996) ........................ 23
 Project Extra Mile v Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n
, 283 Neb 379, 810 NW2d 149 (2012) . 4,6, 7, 8
 Rath v City of Sutton
, 267 Neb 265, 673 NW2d 869 (2004) ......................................................... 6
 Ryder Truck Rental, Inc v Rollins
, 246 Neb 250, 518 NW2d 124 (1994) ...................................... 9
Schumacher v Johanns
, 272 Neb 346, 722 NW2d 37 (2006) ................................................. 11, 16
State ex rel Shepherd v Nebraska Equal Opportunity Comm'n
, 251 Neb 517, 557 NW 2d 684(1997)......................................................................................................................................... 12
State ex rel Spire v Nw Bell Tel Co
, 233 Neb 262, 445 NW2d 284 (1989) .................... 11, 12, 16§
State v Ellis
, 281 Neb 571, 799 NW2d 267 (2011) ...................................................................... 23
Statutes
 
 Neb Rev Stat 
§ 14-366....................................................................................................................19
 Neb Rev Stat 
§ 24-302..................................................................................................................... 1
 Neb Rev Stat 
§§ 25-24,129............................................................................................................. 1

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->