• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
ADVOCACY
Barbara Loe Fisher
is co-ounderand president o the National VaccineInormation Center (
www.NVIC.org
), a non-prot ounded in 1982by parents o vaccine-injured childrento prevent vaccine injuries and deathsthrough public education and deendthe inormed consent ethic.She has served on the National VaccineAdvisory Committee, Institute oMedicine Vaccine Saety Forum, FDAVaccines & Related Biological ProductsAdvisory Committee, Vaccine PolicyAnalysis Collaborative, and ConsumersUnited or Evidence Based Healthcare– U.S. Cochrane Collaboration. She isthe mother o three children.
by barbara Loe Fisher
T
he Great Denial o vaccine risks orthe past three decades by vaccinemakers, pediatricians, and governmentocials operating the mass vaccinationsystem is the reason why more and moreparents today question and do not trustdoctors who tell them to give their children69 doses o 16 vaccines rom the day obirth through age 18, triple the numberso vaccinations that children were given inthe 1970s. When Harris Coulter and I co-authored
DPT: A Shot in the Dark
1
 
in
 
1985exposing faws in the mass vaccinationsystem that allowed the highly reactive DPTvaccine to stay on the market unimprovedor more than 40 years, we never imaginedthat those tragic faws in the system wouldremain largely intact in 2009.
I knew then that the alliance betweenindustry, organized medicine, and thegovernment was powerul. But it is onlyater a quarter century o witnessing theGreat Denial o vaccine risks, and thereusal to do the credible science thatwill ully evaluate those risks, that themagnitude o that unchecked power hasbeen ully revealed. Even as Americacelebrated the inauguration o a newpresident promising an unprecedentedtransparency and engagement bygovernment with the people, there arenew indications that the powerul andwealthy Vaccine Lobby is gearing upto use the government to minimize thesignicance o new reports o Gardasilvaccine risks;
2
block eorts to conductresearch into vaccine-related autism;
3
 ruin the reputations o researchersinvestigating vaccine-related injuries;
4
 and deny vaccine-injured children ederalcompensation
5
while protecting vaccinemanuacturers rom liability or vaccineinjuries and deaths.
6
 New attacks on reedom to investigate,reedom to speak, and reedom topublish in science are compromisingtruth in science. And one only has tolook at the inappropriate infuence o thepharmaceutical industry on the kinds ovaccine studies that get published in themedical literature
7
to understand why goodvaccine science is not being published andbad vaccine science is being used to coverup what will one day be acknowledgedas an unprecedented iatrogenic epidemico infammation and chronic disease.What gives this tragic epidemic its specialpoignancy is that it is likely that manymore vaccine deaths and injuries will haveto occur beore steps will be taken bythose in power to end it.No matter what is done now bygovernment, industry, and medicalorganizations ghting to protect thestatus quo and deny the reality o vaccinecasualties, they cannot unring the bell thathas been ringing in the U.S. since 1982.That bell, which tolls or children robbedo health by poorly regulated vaccinesand one-size-ts-all vaccine policies thatdo not acknowledge biodiversity, willcontinue to ring louder and louder witheach vaccine casualty despite attempts tosilence it.
34
THE AUTISM FILE| www.autismle.com REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION OF THE AUTISM FILE ISSUE 31 2009
 
 The question on the minds o manyparents today is: Why are so manyhighly vaccinated children so sick anddisabled? During the past quartercentury, once prevalent childhoodinectious diseases in Americalike whooping cough, measles,mumps, and chicken pox have beensuppressed with the use o multiplevaccines, but now 1 in every 6children
8
becomes developmentallydelayed while 1 in 150 or morechildren develops autism.
9
 
 Is there scientic evidence to suggestthere could be an associationbetween increased use o vaccines byAmerica’s children and increases inchronic disease and disability amongchildren? In a new book,
Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inammation: TheNew Epidemic
10
(which is an alteredversion o a chapter I wrote or
Envisioning a Bright Future
editedby Patricia Lemer) the evidence romthe medical literature is presentedto support a “Yes” answer to thatquestion.Although the U.S. Court o Claimsrecently declined to award ederalvaccine injury compensation to threechildren, who regressed into autismater vaccination, the several biologicalmechanisms being argued were connedto ones involving thimerosal (mercury)and MMR vaccine.
11
Whether oneagrees or disagrees about the quantityand quality o the scientic evidencedemonstrating causation or lack ocausation with regard to the specicbiological mechanisms that were arguedin these three cases, the act remains thata causal relationship between vaccinationand chronic brain and immune systemdysunction has been very wellestablished in the medical literature ormore than a century.
Complications o Inections andVaccination Similar
A review o more than a century omedical literature reveals ample evidencethat neurological and immune systemdysunction caused by inectious diseasesare oten identical to neurological andimmune system dysunction causedby vaccines created using those samelab-altered viruses and bacteria. A host/disease or host/vaccine interactioncauses infammation, which is acute atrst and becomes chronic rather thanresolving and leaving the host with goodhealth. In both cases, the end resultis unresolved infammation leading toimmune-mediated brain dysunctiono varying degrees o severity, which isthe same prole many have observedin children with autism spectrumdisorders.
12,13
 Researchers have ound evidence ochronic infammation in the brains opatients with autism, particularly in thecerebellum. Autistic brains have beenobserved to be in “a chronic state ospecic cytokine activity.” The suggestedbiological mechanisms responsibleor the observed brain infammationincluded chronic disease or an externalenvironmental source.
14
 Beginning with smallpox vaccine,which was the rst attempt to preventan inectious disease by injecting aportion o a microorganism associatedwith the disease into human beings,the most eared complication o bothsmallpox and smallpox vaccination wasbrain infammation.
15
In the early 1930s,virologist Thomas Rivers studied the braindamaging eects o rabies vaccine andprovided the rst evidence that immunecells can attack the brain.
16
 Acute brain infammation, whetherit ollows inectious disease
17,18,19
orvaccination, can become chronic andresult in various kinds o mild to severeneurological dysunction maniested bylearning disabilities, ADD/ADHD, seizuredisorders, autism, mental retardation, andother developmental delays.The association between vaccinationand the development o autisticbehaviors in previously healthy childrenwas rst reported in 1985 in
DPT: A Shot in the Dark
in which Harris Coulter andI documented never-beore-reportedcase histories o DPT vaccine-relatedbrain infammation and permanent braindamage in previously healthy children.These cases were considered by anInstitute o Medicine (IOM) Committeepreparing a landmark report
 AdverseEects o Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines
in 1991.
20
 
Vaccines Can Cause Acute andChronic Brain and ImmuneDysunction
The 1991 IOM Committee examiningthe evidence or and against a causalrelationship between DPT vaccine andneurological dysunction concluded that“the evidence is consistent with a causalrelation” between DPT vaccine andacute encephalopathy, encephalitis, orencephalomyelitis. (In that same report,
35
ISSUE 31 2009 REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION OF THE AUTISM FILE www.autismle.com| THE AUTISM FILE
 
36
THE AUTISM FILE| www.autismle.com REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION OF THE AUTISM FILE ISSUE 31 2009
the IOM concluded that the “evidenceis consistent with a causal relation”between rubella vaccine and acute andchronic arthritis, an autoimmune disorderinvolving infammation o the joints.)In 1994, another IOM Committee wenturther ater re-analyzing the landmark1981 prospective, case-controlled British
National Childhood Encephalopathy  Study 
(NCES)
21
and concluded in areport entitled
DPT Vaccine and ChronicNeurological Dysunction
that:
The NCES data are consistent withthe possibility that some childrenwithout underlying brain or metabolicabnormalities might experience seriousacute neurologic illness within 7 daysater receiving DPT and that acuteillness could have chronic nervous system sequelae. The NCES data arealso consistent with the possibility that  some children with underlying brain or metabolic abnormalities (which oster a “triggering” by DPT o an acuteneurologic illness) might go on to developchronic nervous system dysunctiondue to a DPT-triggered acute illness.Thereore, the Committee concludes that the balance o evidence is consistent with a causal relation between DPT andthe orms o chronic nervous systemdysunction described in the NCES inthose children who experience a seriousacute neurologic illness within 7 daysater receiving DPT vaccine….theestimated excess risk ranged rom 0 to10.5 per million immunizations.
22
 Although the word “autism” didnot appear in the NCES, the types oDPT-induced chronic neurologicaldysunction that were listed in that studyo neurological dysunction in childrenwere described as “neurologic, motor,sensory, educational, behavioral and sel-care dysunctions” such as severe ebrileand non-ebrile convulsions, tremor,gross and ne motor incoordination,muscle weakness, abnormal tendonrefexes, hyperactive behavior, unsociablebehavior, vision and hearing losses. Itis worth noting that the original 1981NCES ound that “the risk o a seriousneurological disorder within 14 days atermeasles vaccine in previously normalchildren irrespective o eventual clinicaloutcome is 1 in 87,000 immunizations”while the NCES authors ound that “theattributable risk o a serious neurologicaldisorder within seven days ater DTPvaccine in previously normal childrenirrespective o eventual clinical outcomeis 1 in 110,000 immunizations.”A 1994 IOM Committee examining themedical literature concluded in the report
 Adverse Events Associated with ChildhoodVaccines
that “the evidence establishes acausal relation between measles vaccineand death rom measles vaccine-strainviral inection.”
23
In 1998, CDC ocialspublished a study o cases o braininfammation within 15 days o MMR ormeasles vaccination that ended in deathor permanent brain injury, including“mental regression and retardation,chronic seizures, motor and sensorydecits, and movement disorders.” Theauthors noted a clustering o caseswith signs and symptoms o braininfammation (such as seizures) occurringon days 8 and 9 ater MMR or measlesvaccination and concluded that “a causalrelationship between measles vaccine andencephalopathy may exist.”
24
In 1999, astudy was published in
Clinical InectiousDiseases
in which the authors state, “webelieve that the present report is therst to clearly demonstrate that severeneurological disease can be caused by thevaccine strain o measles virus.”
25
 
Multiple Vaccines, GeneticVulnerability and Brain andImmune Dysunction
The possibility that genetically vulnerablechildren may develop neurologicaldysunction ater repeated atypicalmanipulations o the immune systemwith multiple vaccines in early childhoodis an hypothesis I rst presented to theInstitute o Medicine ImmunizationSaety Review Committee in January2001. I stated:
There is a compelling argument tobe made that the dramatic increase inchronic brain and immune dysunction inchildren, especially the rising number o reports o regression in previously healthy children, is due to an early exposurethat is being experienced by all childrenbut which is harming an expandingminority o them…. Many biologicalresponses are at least partially under  genetic control. I, or example, adverseresponses to vaccination are tied to the genes responsible or predisposition toautoimmunity and immune-mediatedneurological dysunction, then it is possible that the addition o more doseso vaccines to the routine schedule inthe past two decades has aected moreand more children with that genetic predisposition…
26
Thereore, when all children wereexposed only to DPT and polio vaccinein the early 1960s, a tiny raction othe genetically susceptible respondedadversely. But with the addition omeasles, mumps, and rubella to theroutine schedule in 1979, and thenHIB, hepatitis B, and chicken pox in thelate 1980s and 1990s, ar more o thegenetically susceptible have been broughtinto the adverse-responder group.This hypothesis could not be examinedby the IOM in their 2002 report on
Multiple Immunizations and ImmuneDysunction.
Ater reviewing evidencein the medical literature, the IOMImmunization Saety Review Committeestated that:
The committee was unable to addressthe concern that repeated exposure o a[genetically] susceptible child to multipleimmunizations over the developmental period may also produce atypical or non-specifc immune or nervous systeminjury that could lead to severe disability or death (Fisher, 2001). There are noepidemiological studies to addressthis. Thus, the committee recognizes
A healthy, mature immune system requires an equalbalance of cellular and humoral immune system responses.A disruption in this balance can lead to developmentof allergy and autoimmune disorders, includingneuroimmune disorders.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...