Key Trends
Colours help to keep foods looking ‘fresh’throughout their shelf life or duringprocessing - but recent reports (see
TheSouthampton Study
, below) and mediainterest have heightened pressure oncompanies to choose ‘natural’ alternativesinstead. Whilst this is likely to have adamaging e
ff
ect on the use of certaincolours, synthetic colours remain indemand in areas where viable natural alternatives have yet to be developed.
Pressure from EFSA: The Southampton Study
In December 2007, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was asked to assess a studycarried out by the University of Southampton, which suggested that certain mixes of foodcolours with the preservative sodium benzoate (commonly used in soft drinks) couldcause hyperactivity in children. The main conclusion subsequently brought to theEuropean Commission by the EFSA was that artificial food colours and additives wereseen to exacerbate hyperactive behaviour in children, at least to middle childhood.Since the study’s findings were published, o
ffi
cialEU advice to parents suggests that childrensusceptible to hyperactivity should avoid thefollowing:
•
Sunset yellow (E110)
•
Quinoline yellow (E104)
•
Carmoisine (E122)
•
Allura red (E129)
•
Tartrazine (E102)
•
Ponceau 4R (E124)Whilst some controversy remains around itsfindings, The Southampton Study has encouragedmany retailers and manufacturers to reformulate products containing the above colours. This is not a new phenomenon, as many companies have been working for years toreplace artificial colours, but this study was significant in accelerating the process.
Colours Western Europe Special Report
© Copyright RTS Resource 2009
Page 3 of 5
Further information is available in:
Colours
- a Food Manufacture Market Reportproduced in association with RTS.
Key Drivers
The main drivers are, as follows:
•
Health
- particularly for children
•
Development of ‘natural’alternatives
•
Movement from artificial towardsnature identical (NI)
Add a Comment