/  3
 
Vodacom: Allegations/suspicions in South Africa
The following documents have been sent to Vodacom, Telkom and Vodafoneexecutives and shareholders (including chief executive of Vodafone, VittorioColao) in relation to this case:
From: Dino Anastassiou (Johannesburg, South Africa)Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:00 PMSubject: Fwd: Allegations/Suspicions in SATo: Vittorio.Colao@vodafone.comCc: richard.snow@vodafone.com, gavin.darby@vodafone.com,septmrj@telkom.co.zaDear Mr Vittorio Colao, I would like to bring to your attention that I have reported the followingsuspicions/allegations to Mr. Darby and September on 2 June 2009, to date Ihave had no response.I therefore wish to bring to your attention that I will be reporting this matterto the Law Enforcement Authorities/Agencies in New York SecuritiesExchange , London Securities Exchange and South African JohannesburgSecurities Exchange, South African Receiver of Revenue under SarbanesOxley Act which governs all listed entities in USA, UK, SA and othercountries.I would appreciate your response within 72 hours and thereafter I will takethe necessary steps.Thanking you kindly.Dino AnastassioShareholders, Gavin Darby (Vodafone) and Reuben September (Telkom)
Date: 2 June 2009Vodafone and Telkom are internationally listed and my understanding, all listedentities have to comply to Sarbanes Oxley Act in line with global practices.Vodafone is now listed in South Africa through Vodacom Group Pty Ltd. I herebywish to bring certain dubious transactions which have taking place in South Africa,which I believe warrant your attention and investigation.
1. Vodacom took our home
 
In the laws of the Republic of South Africa, no incapacitated party can conclude atransaction or an agreement. However in this case, Vodacom was able tounlawfully conclude a transaction by its Attorneys. A copy of the memorandum of agreement is annexed as X1 and Deed of Sale annexed as X2. Request for a copy of Deed of Sale from Michaelides Attorneys annexed as X3, Deed of SaleMemorandum annexed as X4, signature of purchaser annexed as X5.Kindly pay specific attention to the property company that bought the house, it ismentioned as Scarlet Ibis Investments 23 (Pty) Ltd annexed in X2 section 8.4 fromthe memorandum of agreement.
Ownership of Scarlet Ibis Investments 23 (Pty) Ltd
According to the transcripts of the Law Society of SA annexed as X6, X7, X8,according to X8 during the Law Society hearing against Mr Cohen, Mr Michaelides, and Ms Christodulou all Attorneys related and doing business withVodacom Group and its subsidiaries , Mr Michaelides conceded that MariaFernandes was a secretary of Michaelides Attorneys and Conveyancers.Upon my own investigations, Vodacom Attorneys mentioned above, submitted asignature that was not authorised by Mr George Anastassiou. A copy of my father'ssignature is annexed as X9 and is different from the signature used to acquire the property by Vodacom. All signatures vary as the man was not in his mentalcapacity to conclude any agreement whatsoever.A possible claim of the above-mentioned sale of the property annexed as X10 fromthe Department of Land Affairs. This case was reported extensively in thenewspapers: refer www.busrep.co.za/index.php?ArtcleId=4690178.
Could you kindly investigate and revert back with feedback of yourinvestigation and outcome.2. Criminal case against Leslie Cohen,
A criminal case was opened against Mr Leslie Cohen at the Hillbrow Police station,case number 2296/10/08 is annexed as X11 and the affidavit from Mrs Anastassiouannexed as X12. Vodacom continues to utilise Mr Cohen's services despite the pending criminal case.
Mr Michaelidis Attorneys
case at the Law Society is pending the High Courtapplication as per the recommendation from the Deeds Office (Land Affairs) andthe letter of the registrar of the Deeds. However is also pending your investigation.
3. FERNANDES CHRISTINA MARIA MARTINS

Share & Embed

More from this user

Commenting has been disabled.