Iiation ReviewDecsion of e Bod of maton AppealsFals
Fle: A045 624 720 -Newk, NJ
re EDGAR ORTEGA
EMOVAL POCEGS APPE AD MOTIONDateO BEALF OF RESPEN Jeey B Steifeld, squie APPLICATIO Contuce; rem
EP 2 3
O June 4, 2013, n Imatn Judge deed the espondent emoved to Pe as aenconvcted of agavate loy
secto 237(a)(2)(A)(i) o the Iigaton atoal Act, 8 USC. § 1227(a)(2)(A)() he rendet ed a tiely apea o eImgaton Judge's decision On Aust , 203, he espondent led a otio to ebase o a sate co ruln eucn s setece the cmnal convctn delyig eche of removabty The Deent of Hoelan Secty (DS) has not le a espose to the resoets aea or moto. The oto w be te and e ecod wll be eeWe evew a mgato Jges ndns ct cea eo, ut uestios of law,discet, nd jet, d al oe ssues apeas, de novo8 C.R§§003(d)(3)(),(i) he HS chges he esoet as emovable pursut to secto 237(a)(2)(A)() o e Act, s alen covicte aggravate lony under secton 0(a)(43)(F) o e Ac,8 SC § 10(a)(43)()Secton 10(a)(43)(F), i t, denes aggravated lony as a cme o violece r whch he term o mpsoet s at least ne ye The respondent wasconvcte on Juy 4, 200, of wo cnts of agavated ssault n e ird egee, in voaonof J Sat § 2C2(7) he was ntay setence t ve yeas of mpsoent r eachcot, to
cocetly Aached to his oto to re, e esndent peses evece that on Je 25, 2013, he was resetence to 3 ays of coneent each assaut ese.
esp. oto, Ta CThe espondet eree gues at ecause hs sentence was educe to de 1 yea he s noge eovae as aie covcte of aavat o n
M of Co-Vg,
23&N Dec 89 (BA 2005), e he hat a al cous ecsn t o alens csentence nunc p
as eted to at d cedt by Iao Jues ths Bod at e ie sentence wou be vad ato pposes egdess o e eonsbehind the setece reucton.
lo M of og
23 I&N Dec. 3 (BIA 2001)
8 &N ec 22 (BA 1982)Base on e eviece o the esets setece euct, we n at a e er cosideato as to e esets eoval elgit eef o remv s
Cite as: Edgar Ortega, A045 624 720 (BIA Sept. 23, 2013)