• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 
DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS, INFORMATION ONTRADE ALERTS, ANALYST MODEL PORTFOLIOS AND THE STATUS OF NON-U.S ANALYSTS. FOR OTHERIMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, visit www.credit-suisse.com/ researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683.
U.S.Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result,investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investorsshould consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. Customers of Credit Suisse in theUnited States can receive independent, third party research on the company or companies covered in this report, at no costto them, where such research is available. Customers can access this independent research at www.credit-suisse.com/ir orcall 1 877 291 2683 or email equity.research@credit-suisse.com to request a copy of this research.08 July 2009Americas/United States
Equity Research
Homebuilding / MARKET WEIGHT
Monthly Survey of Real EstateAgents
CHANNEL CHECK
Low-End Buyers Represent Majority of Activity
■ 
Traffic off slightly, but remains at reasonable levels.
Our Monthly Surveyof Real Estate Agents showed a market heavily-influenced by foreclosureswith buyers remaining extremely price sensitive, seeking out “deals.” Overall,buyer traffic declined modestly to 43.1 in June from 45.4 in May, the secondstraight decline. Agents cited modestly lower traffic in several foreclosure-heavy markets (resulting from the decreased supply of attractive foreclosureproperties), but traffic was generally still at fairly healthy levels.
■ 
Strength in Washington, D.C.; continued weakness in Texas.
Our trafficindex in Washington, D.C. increased to 63 in June from 53 in May, withagents highlighting some pent-up demand among buyers. The majority ofother markets with strong readings for traffic were foreclosure heavymarkets in Florida and the Southwest. In contrast, we saw further weaknessin the Texas markets, as our traffic index in Austin fell to 28 from 35 in May,the traffic index in Dallas was up slightly to 41 from 39 in May, but fell slightlyin Houston to 22 from 24 in May. Charlotte was another area where agentscited weakness in traffic, with the index falling to 25 in June from 36 in May.
■ 
Reaching a bottom on foreclosure pricing; further weakness at thehigh end.
Our price index increased 3.9 points in June to 30.9, up from 27.0in May. This is improvement, but any reading below 50 still indicatessequentially lower prices. Agents noted flat prices sequentially in several ofthe foreclosure-heavy markets such as Fort Myers, the Inland Empire, andPhoenix. Agents saw rising prices in Washington, D.C., the first sequentialincrease in that market since the downturn started four years ago.Interestingly, in contrast with other foreclosure-heavy markets, agents arestill see pricing declines in Las Vegas, with our price index at 32 (up from 23in May). Agents noted some of the weakest pricing in the Southeastern andFlorida markets.
■ 
Appraisal issues cause hiccups for more transactions.
Agents indicatedmore challenges with appraisals (i.e., appraisals coming in below thecontract price), although the concerns have shifted to “poor qualityappraisers” following the enactment of the Home Valuation Code of Conduct(HVCC) rather than simply conservatism among the appraisers. We expectthis issue to continue to disrupt transactions in the coming months.
Research AnalystsDaniel Oppenheim, CFA
212 325 5726dan.oppenheim@credit-suisse.com
Michael Dahl
212 325 5882michael.dahl@credit-suisse.com
Russell W. Lane
212 538 3992russell.lane@credit-suisse.com
 
 
08 July 2009
 
Monthly Survey of Real Estate Agents
 
2
Table of Contents
Overview of Results………………………………..…..3Survey Methodology…………………………………...5Top 20 Housing Markets
Atlanta, Georgia 7Austin, Texas 8Charlotte, North Carolina 9Chicago, Illinois 10Dallas, Texas 11Denver, Colorado 12Fort Myers, Florida 13Houston, Texas 14Jacksonville, Florida 15Las Vegas, Nevada 16Los Angeles, California 17Miami, Florida 18Minneapolis, Minnesota 19New York-Northern New Jersey 20Orlando, Florida 21Phoenix, Arizona 22Riverside-San Bernardino [Inland Empire], California 23Seattle, Washington 24Tampa, Florida 25Washington, D.C. 26
Additional Key Housing Markets…………………… 27
Baltimore, Maryland 28Boston, Massachusetts 29Charleston, South Carolina 30Cincinnati, Ohio 31Columbus, Ohio 32Detroit, Michigan 33Nashville, Tennessee 34Philadelphia-Southern New Jersey 35Port St. Lucie, Florida 36Portland, Oregon 37Raleigh, North Carolina 38Richmond, Virginia 39Sacramento, California 40San Antonio, Texas 41San Diego, California 42San Francisco, California 43Sarasota, Florida 44Tucson, Arizona 45Virginia Beach, Virginia 46Wilmington, North Carolina 47
Historical Survey Trends by Market……………… 48
*Markets are characterized based on permit activity and listed in Alphabetical order 
 
 
08 July 2009
 
Monthly Survey of Real Estate Agents
 
3
Low-End Buyers Represent Majority of Activity
For those who may be unfamiliar with our survey, we center our indices around 50 so that readings above 50 indicate positive or improving trends and readings below 50 indicate negative or worsening trends. Please see page 5 for a full description of our survey methodology.
Traffic off slightly, but remains at reasonable levels.
Our Monthly Survey of RealEstate Agents showed a market heavily-influenced by foreclosures with buyers remainingextremely price sensitive, seeking out “deals”. Overall, Buyer traffic declined modestly to43.1 in June from 45.4 in May, the second straight decline. Agents cited modestly lowertraffic in several foreclosure-heavy markets (resulting from the decreased supply ofattractive foreclosure properties), but traffic was generally still at fairly healthy levels.
Exhibit 1:Traffic Drops Slightly in June as Buyers See Fewer Bargains 
MonthBuyerTrafficIndexHomePriceIndexIncentiveIndexHomeListingsIndexTimeto SellIndex
Apr-2008 33.1 20.6 28.3 27.2 24.2May-2008 31.5 21.4 30.8 32.1 24.9Jun-2008 29.0 22.1 28.8 33.6 26.6Jul-2008 27.4 21.0 30.5 34.7 24.9Aug-2008 25.9 20.1 29.7 37.5 25.7Sep-2008 24.0 17.5 30.6 39.5 22.5Oct-2008 19.6 15.3 29.6 41.0 19.9Nov-2008 19.8 15.3 30.3 45.3 22.0Dec-2008 25.3 13.3 30.3 48.0 23.2Jan-2009 36.5 15.9 32.1 43.5 26.6Feb-2009 36.0 17.1 31.1 40.5 28.2Mar-2009 39.5 20.5 32.5 41.7 33.4Apr-2009 48.4 24.8 35.3 45.3 42.6May-2009 45.4 27.0 37.5 47.0 44.6Jun-2009 43.1 30.9 41.2 52.4 43.7
Point change(2.3)3.93.75.3(0.9)
 
Source: Credit Suisse estimates 
Strength in Washington, D.C.; continued weakness in Texas.
Our traffic in Washington,D.C. increased to 63 in June from 53 in May, with agents highlighting some pent-updemand among buyers. The majority of other markets with strong readings for traffic wereforeclosure heavy markets in Florida and the Southwest. In contrast, we saw furtherweakness in the Texas markets, as our traffic index in Austin fell to 28 from 35 in May, thetraffic index in Dallas was up slightly to 41 from 39 in May, but fell slightly in Houston to 22from 24 in May. Charlotte was another area where agents cited weakness in traffic, withthe index falling to 25 in June from 36 in May.
Reaching a bottom on foreclosure pricing; further weakness at the high end.
Ourprice index increased 3.9 points in June to 30.9, up from 27.0 in May. This is improvement,but any reading below 50 still indicates sequentially lower prices. Agents noted flat prices
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...