Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Writ Petition--Young v. Schmidt

Writ Petition--Young v. Schmidt

Ratings:

4.0

(1)
|Views: 438|Likes:

More info:

Published by: smayer@howardrice.com on Jul 11, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT
0 F
THETATEOF
CALIFORNIA
CHARLES YOUNG
, an individual
Petitioner
GREGORY SCHMIDT
, in his capacity as Secretaryof the
California
State Senate; and E. DOTSON WILSON
, in his capacity as Chief
Clerk
of the
California State Assembly,
Respondents.
PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
, INCLUDINGWRIT OF MANDATE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
WILLIAM A. NORRIS (SBN 25989)
REX S. HEINKE (SBN
66163)
L. RACHEL HEL Y
AR (SBN 193080)
ORL Y DEGANI
(SBN 177741)
CHRISTOPHER BLANCHARD
(SBN 250729)
JULIAN W. PARK (SBN
263501)
2029 CENTURY PARK EAST
, SUITE 2400
Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067-
3012TELEPHONE: 310-
229-
1000
FACSIMILE: 310-
229-
1001
ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
CHARLES YOUNG
 
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PARTIES
(Cal. Rules of Court
, Rule 8.
208)
Petitioner knows of no entity or person that must be listed under
subsections (1) or (2) of Rule 8.
208. (Cal. Rules of Court
, rule 8.
208
(d)(3).
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pa2;ePRELIMINARY AND JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT .......................
THE PARTIES...... ....................
FACTS.. ........ .................
CLAIMS ASSERTED """"""""""""""""""""""""""".............................
RELIEF SOUGHT .........................................................................................
VERIFICATION............................................................................................MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES INSUPPORT OF PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
INCLUDING WRIT OF MANDATE ...........................................................
INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................The Supermajority Requirements Of Article IV
Section 12(
d), And Article XIII A
, Section 3, Are
Unconstitutional Revisions to the State Constitution. ...........
Majority Rule Is Foundational To The StructureAnd Power Of The Legislative Branch Of Our
Government. ...............................................................The Governors Veto Authority Is A
Foundational Executive Power And AnEssential Part of The System of Checks And
Balances Established By The StateConstitution.................................................................Article IV, Section 12(d), And Article XIII A
Section 3
, Fundamentally Alter CaliforniaBasic Governmental Structure By Eliminating
The Legislature
s Foundational Power Of
Majority Rule And The Executive

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Bil Jones liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->