• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Helping US consumers rethink retirement
The economic crisis has left US consumers anxious and less prepared thanever for retirement, yet few are changing course.
Céline Duetel, Salim Ramji, and Joanna Rotenberg
MAY
20 0 9
financial
 
services
 
1
Consumer anxiety
about retirement risks has jumped dramatically in the United Statesas a result of the economic crisis, which last year reduced the value of US household
nancial assets (excluding real estate) by an average of 18 percent. Yet the vast majority 
of US consumers haven’t changed their investment portfolios and don’t plan to postponeretirement, according to our nationwide January 2009 retirement survey of 2,000 US
consumers. This nding suggests that many of them have not yet gured out how to react tothe crisis.The reason, in part, may be that nancial advisers have provided only limited guidanceto their clients over the last six months, reaching out to just two in ve of them—perhapsfearing an angry response after 2008’s staggering $2.4 trillion decline in the value of retirement assets in dened-contribution accounts and IRAs.
1
The overall level of advicefrom nancial advisers fell signicantly, compared with 2007. But the best advisers weresmarter: they reached out systematically and proactively even to clients with signicantlosses. The results, according to our survey, were signicantly strengthened relationships,referrals, and asset ows.To be sure, retirement fears have spiked across the board, as the results from our survey show: consumer anxiety about interest rate risks and a lack of guaranteed income hasmore than doubled, to around 60 percent, from the levels prevailing three to ve yearsago; worries about market and inationary pressures have jumped by half, to about 75percent; women continue to be signicantly more anxious than men; and high-net-worthindividuals—those with more than $1 million in investable assets—are even more concernedthan others.US consumers haven’t panicked, however: in the past six months, only 1 percent havemoved assets away from their primary nancial institution, just 37 percent have changed
their investment portfolios, and no more than 20 percent have changed their retirement
portfolios. Those who did make changes have tried to reduce their risk levels by rebalancingallocations toward conservative assets (38 percent), products with guaranteed rates of return (32 percent), and holdings of cash and cash equivalents (23 percent) (Exhibit 1). Mostpreretirees have also responded to the nancial crisis by curbing their lifestyles: some 60percent reduced spending in the six months leading up to January 2009, and 73 percent paiddown debt. Although consumers have taken some prudent near-term steps, these could be maskinga deeper failure to understand the state of retirement security. McKinsey’s retirementreadiness index (RRI)—which uses Social Security, dened benets, dened contributions,and other nancial assets to measure the nancial preparedness of households forretirement—is currently at 63 for an average household in January 2009.
2
Consumers must
have an RRI of 100 to maintain their current standard of living at retirement. An RRI below 80 calls for large reductions in spending on basic needs, such as housing, food, and healthcare.
1
Each employee with a defned-contribution plan, such as a 401(k), makes regular contributions to an individual account, whichmay also receive contributions rom the employer. Taxes on the earnings are deerred until withdrawals begin, usually at retirement. An employee who changes employer can generally transer such an account to the new one. A person with an IRA (IndividualRetirement Account) makes regular contributions to it, and here, too, taxes on the earnings are deerred until withdrawals begin,usually at retirement.
2
The average head o a US household is a preretiree, is aged 40 to 59 years old, and earns $50,000 to $100,000 a year.
 
 Yet our survey showed that only about a quarter of US consumers are consideringpostponing retirement as a result of the crisis: the expected retirement age, 64, hasn’tchanged since 2007 (Exhibit 2). Despite the fall in home values, the proportion of peopleplanning to nance their retirement through home equity has increased slightly. Althoughhigh-net-worth individuals seem more willing than others to work longer—39 percent now expect to postpone retirement—they aren’t willing to compromise their lifestyles or nancial bequests.
2
Exhibit 1
A passive response
Exhibit 2
No postponement
The majority of consumers did not make anychanges to their investment portfolios . . .. . . and those who did make changes favoredconservative investments and guaranteed products.Top changes made
Have you made changes to your investment  portfolio in the last  months in response tothe nancial crisis?
 
Source:  McKinsey retirement survey of , US consumers
Rebalanced allocationtoward conservativeportfolioMoved significantassets to cash or cashequivalentsPurchased products thatgrow at guaranteed rateof returnPurchased currentlyundervalued stocks38322523
43759
MadechangesDidn’t makechangesDon’t know% of respondents
Preretiree perception of future retirement plans,
1
%
 
Mass market are consumers with <, investable assets; mass afuent have ,–,; afuent have,–,,; high net worth have >,,.Source:  McKinsey retirement survey of , US consumers
Plan to retire at same ageDon’t think they will ever retireAverage planned retirementage, 64, hasn’t changedsince 2007Plan to retire earlier than plannedPlan to postpone retirementHigh networth
39479
Affluent
25677
Massaffluent
26647
Massmarket
246111
All pre-retirees
26638
1
Plan to retire as planned or earlierPlan to postpone retirement
4533
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...