Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement

Stipulation and Settlement Agreement

Ratings: (0)|Views: 148|Likes:
ACLU SoCal
ACLU SoCal

More info:

categoriesBusiness/Law
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

02/27/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Jessica Price (SBN 264053) jprice@aclu-sc.orgAhilan T. Arulanantham (SBN 237841)aarulanantham@aclu-sc.orgACLU FOUNDATION OFSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA1313 West Eighth StreetLos Angeles, California 90017T: (213) 977-9500F: (213) 977-5297Stephen S. Smith (SBN 166539)ssmith@GreenbergGlusker.comRachel Valadez (SBN 252415)rvaladez@GreenbergGlusker.comGREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN &MACHTINGER LLP1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4590T: (310) 553-3610F: (310) 553-0687Attorneys for PlaintiffsUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAJOHN PAUL MORROW; et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.UNITED STATES PAROLECOMMISSION; et al.,Defendants.)))))))))))CASE NO.: 12-CV-700 DSF (RZx)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:336
 
 112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728The Parties have reached agreement on a settlement in this case.
See
Exhibit A
(“Agreement”).
Under the terms of the Agreement, Defendants agree not toreinstitute or otherwise conduct video conferencing of parole hearings for inmateswho are incarcerated within the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit, absent a) a material change in the applicable language of 18U.S.C. § 4208(e), or b) a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals or theUnited States Supreme Court holding that 18 U.S.C. § 4208(e) permits the ParoleCommission to conduct parole hearings by video conference. In light of thatAgreement, Plaintiffs agree to dismiss this case with prejudice.IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this actionthrough their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby isdismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2),subject to the Court retaining exclusive and continuing jurisdiction to enforce theAgreement attached as Exhibit A.Dated: September 30, 2013 Respectfully submitted,By: /s/ Jessica PriceJessica PriceACLU of Southern CaliforniaAttorney for PlaintiffsANDRE BIROTTE JR.United States AttorneyLEON W. WEIDMANAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Civil DivisionBy: /s/ Robert I. Lester Robert I. Lester Assistant United States AttorneyAttorney for Defendants
Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33 Filed 09/30/13 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:337
 
Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33-1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:338

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->