Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Feeder Funds

Feeder Funds

Ratings: (0)|Views: 40|Likes:
Published by VanStokkom

More info:

Published by: VanStokkom on Jul 12, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





July 2009
Feeder funds
Henk J.Th. van Stokkom
Via Google I searched for
 playing hard to get 
and 161.000.000 hits were the result. I also googled
equal partnership
and 3.490.000 results were available.In the development world the phrase
equal partnership
has been used a lot over the last ten years .But who plays
hard to get 
the donor or the NGO .. ? Who determines the reporting and who shutsthe
if push comes to shove?A similar situation was faced twenty years ago in the financial world. Fund managers were beggingfor money and institutional investors were determining the game. A classic
buyers market 
.So the beggars had to prove how good their results were, how sophisticated their investmentmethods and how safe their procedures were and so on.But somewhere and somehow it changed to a certain extent. With Madoff as an interesting example.Because Madoff was delivering constant - relative high - results for people investing with him, hestarted playing
hard to get 
. So if you wanted to put money into an account that was managed byMadoff and company, it was not a matter of signing and transferring the money. All doors wereclosed and existing customers rumored about the results, but you never saw a Madoff 
give us your money 
advertisement. In the meanwhile the account minimum was raised and your two hundredthousand dollars were not so very interesting anymore. Because the minimum account level wasraised feeder funds appeared. They aggregated the money to the minimum level needed. Thereforethe distance between investor and Madoff became larger and people had to rely on the informationfrom the feeder funds.Todays large fund raising organizations like Oxfam etcetera are the ones investing in
operatorswho run projects for children. So they do what Madoff was supposed to do; invest the money andmake sure there is a good return.Madoff made a return for the ones who supplied the money. Fund raising organizations aresupposed to make a social return for the target group they
the money in, on behalf of thesuppliers. And while Madoff and his feeder funds are now in deep trouble (after raking in 50 billiondollars or so..) one can see the same mechanics in the world of philanthropy in general anddevelopment aid in particular. In The Netherlands we see products whereby you take out a mortgageand part of the money is not for you but for an NGO building houses in Africa or elsewhere. For theDutch mortgage owner the interest paid on the mortgage is tax deductable. Sounds like a
 construction to you? It certainly does to me. There is also an organization that collects money via theInternet. Your money will be
for 100% in projects for children via organizations like Unicef.Sounds like a feeder fund? It does to me.Feeder funds can be good. They can be located in the country of the investor and therefore use taxfacilities or be setup in such a way that tax facilities for the donors can be used. Facilities that the

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->