It has now been approximately six months since a so-cial rebellion erupted in Greece December 9th 2008,after the police murdered a fifteen-year old in Athens.
I use the word
“erupted” with great care since themainstream capitalist media has worked to present therebellion as if it emerged all-of-a-sudden from a void,sparked merely by outrage in response to police vio-lence and frustration about the lagging economy.
Therebellion “erupted,” yes, but only because the fire hadalready been built – through a strong radical labormovement, student movement, immigrants rightsmovement/anti-fascist movement, through social cen-ters and squats, through independent radical media, andthrough the networks and solidarity built through manyyears of struggle.
Without this, no spark could havegenerated the fires – bothliterally and figuratively – that emerged in Greece inDecember 2008.
The flames spread throughneighborhoods and commu-nities, through schools andworkplaces, through net-works and through elec-tronic communication.
Themovement never consistedof isolated activists or anar-chists acting alone in thestreets, rather, many youthand workers became radical-ized (or re-radicalized)through popular struggle.
Greece has a strong right-wing, fascist movement, yetin general the population supported and were impera-tive to the rebellion.
There were certainly folks actingin the streets who just wanted to destroy things anddid not care about having popular support (and I’m notsaying their rage is illegitimate), but in general folksspecifically targeted the state, corporations, and fas-cists, and sought to work to bring people into thestruggle by spreading occupations and popularassemblies.
People worked hard to create new solidarities andrelationships born in mutual struggle and support, andto increase their control over their own lives.
Struggleis not only about attack and the creation of points of rupture, but it is also the creation of new possibilities,new ideas, and new relationships so that space of rup-ture does not disappear as quickly as it was created.
Destruction can be a creative act, but it is never sus-tainable without continual creation.
A communiquéfrom December signed “girls in revolt” described theprocess of revolt as“This incomprehensible, unpredictable convulsion of social rhythms, of the broken time/space, of the struc-tures structured no more, of the border between whatis and what is to come.
A mo-ment of joy and play, of fear, pas-sion, and rage, of confusion andsome consciousness that is griev-ous, dynamic and full of promises.
A moment which, regardless, willeither frighten itself and preservethe automations that created it orwill deny itself constantly in orderto become at each momentsomething different than what itwas before: all in order to avoidending up at the causality of re-volts suffocated in normality, re-volts becoming another form of authority while defending them-selves…We are what we do inorder to change who we are.
Wewant this historical moment toadopt the content we have set forourselves and not the meaningsfrom which it can escapeovernight.”
We saw this process of both re-volt and creation, of new ways of being and relating, new solidaritiesunfold in Greece as the rebellionspread.
People created communi-ties together in autonomousspaces, they created room fornew articulations, and new soli-darities as immigrants, workers,farmers, prisoners, feminists, etc.struggled together and supportedone another.
The Haunt of Albanian Migrants, ina statement titled “These days areours, too” was one of the first toarticulate both their solidarity andtheir own experiences, needs, anddesires in what originally seemedto be a riot of students.
Theirpresence and their own struggle,as with many others, in turnspread and strengthened the re-volt and further transformed boththe meanings and the potential of the struggle.
The struggle againstthe police state, the right-wing,and for autonomy and means of self-support was theirs as much asthe students and/or the anar-chists, as they asserted, and theirself-organizing and self-articulation strengthened ratherthan diluted the rebellion.The “girls in revolt” pointout that it was state violencetoward a “good,” innocentmiddle-class white youththat sparked the rebellionand the widespread supportof anger toward aninjustice.
If Alex had beenan immigrant, a working classwoman, queer, or someonewho was differently-abled,for example, then the inci-dent would not have gener-ated such popular outrage.
Yet despite the source of thespark, the rebellion itself created new spaces for ar-ticulations such as those of the “Haunt of Albanian Migrants”and the “girls in revolt,” and newsolidarities across intersectionaloppressions.The “girls in revolt” supported therebellion, but they critically as-serted within the movement thevalidity of many forms of “mili-tancy” and “revolt” and ques-tioned the patriarchal authority of both the police and those whofight them in the streets.
Theyargue that “moral order and malesovereignty” are the prerogativeof the state and the figure of thepolice officer, yet “if the rebelsneed to muster up their masculin-ity in order to fight the cop, theyneed to question it at the sametime because it constitutes theauthority they use to fight thecop.”It is these critical discussions,
continued on page 6
THE ORGANIZER
3
Fire in Greece part.1
Add a Comment