You are on page 1of 3

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Volume 65, Issue 3, March 1991, Pages 335 338 Use of a multifunctional precision

attachment in a fixed partial denture with li mited periodontal support. A clinical report Lambert J. Stumpel, D.D.S.Corresponding author contact information, *, Ruud W. Sips** Breda, The Netherlands Abstract A multifunctional precision attachment used in a fixed partial denture with ques tionable prognosis enhances the serviceability of the reconstruction. In the tre atment presented, future loss of the posterior abutments will not jeopardize the complete rehabilitation. Osseointegrated implants used in conjunction with a fi xed prosthesis or a removable partial denture can restore the missing segments.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Volume 58, Issue 3, September 1987, Pages 322 327 A classification of precision attachments Gerardo Becerra, Odontol. Dr.*, Michael MacEntee, L.D.S., R.C.S. (I), F.R.C.D. (C)Corresponding author conta ct information, ** University of British Columbia, Faculty of Dentistry, Vancouver, B.C., Canad a Abstract This overview of attachments is intended to provide an explanation of the design characteristics of 13 different groups. The clinical situation for which an att achment is intended will place specific demands that can be met more closely if the forces acting on the prosthesis are considered. No universal or ideal design is available, so if attachments are used, they should be selected from the grou p with the most suitable characteristics for the task required. The stress-breaking effect of attachments is vague. They offer a potential for r otational and resilient movement between the prosthesis and the abutment teeth, but the amount of stress that must be broken to protect the periodontium of the teeth may exceed the capabilities of any particular attachment used. Nevertheles s, attachments can provide an effective answer to prosthesis stability and reten tion in a way that is cosmetically pleasing.

Classification and selection of attachments 1973, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Close Merrill C. Mensor Jr. Classification and selection of attachments The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 29, Issue 5, May 1973, P ages 494 497 Original Research Article Abstract

An attachment classification and compendium of attachments represent ed by the E. M. attachment selector and gauge have been described and discussed. The E. M. attachment selector and gauge afford a direct line of communication b etween the dentist and the dental laboratory in developing a meaningful work ord er and permit both the dentist and the laboratory technician to have a logical m eans of attachment selection based upon measurements and the function desired. PDF (2661 K) Use of a multifunctional precision attachment in a fixed partial denture with limited periodontal support. A clinical report 1991, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Close Lambert J. Stumpel , Ruud W. Sips Use of a multifunctional precision attachment in a fixed partial den ture with limited periodontal support. A clinical report The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 65, Issue 3, March 1991, Pages 335 338 Abstract A multifunctional precision attachment used in a fixed partial dentu re with questionable prognosis enhances the serviceability of the reconstruction . In the treatment presented, future loss of the posterior abutments will not je opardize the complete rehabilitation. Osseointegrated implants used in conjuncti on with a fixed prosthesis or a removable partial denture can restore the missin g segments. PDF (452 K) Precision attachment dentures 1952, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Close Alexander Leff Precision attachment dentures The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 2, Issue 1, January 1952 , Pages 84 91 Original Research Article PDF (1640 K) View more articles Cited by (7) Telescopic crowns: Extra-oral and intra-oral retention force measurement -in vitro/in vivo correlation 2012, Gerodontology Close Bayer S. , Stark H. , Glz L. , Keilig L. , Kraus D. , Hansen A. , Enk ling N. Telescopic crowns: Extra-oral and intra-oral retention force measure ment -in vitro/in vivo correlation Gerodontology, Volume 29, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages e340-e347 Clinical retention force development of double crowns 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations Close Bayer S. , Stark H. , Glz L. , Keilig L. , Kraus D. , Hansen A. , Enk ling N. Clinical retention force development of double crowns Clinical Oral Investigations, Volume 16, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages 407-411 Abstract This study deals with the development of the retentive forces of dou ble crowns intraorally measured. Twenty-five combined fixed-removable prostheses with a total of 84 double crowns were included in the study. The intraoral meas urement was performed at 72 defined measuring points directly adjacent to the do uble crowns of the dentures. The measurement was performed 4-6 weeks (baseline),

6 months (recall 1), and 18 months (recall 2) after the insertion of the restor ation. A specifically designed measuring device was used. The median values for the single measuring points reached 4.705 N at the baseline, 5.190 N after 6 mon ths, and 3.740 N after 18 months. The measured values were analyzed according to differences between the median retention forces at the three defined points in time. The statistical analysis of the median values showed no statistical differ ence for the retention force change after 6 months but for the decrease until th e second recall (Mann-Whitney test). The retention force per denture was calcula ted by a summation of the single measuring points. At the baseline, 12.9 N was r eached. The forces did only decrease slightly and were not statistically signifi cant. The results indicate that retention force values of double crowns, measure d intraorally at the patient, do not relevantly change clinically within the fir st 1. 5 years. Within the limitations of this study, it can be stated that wear does not influence the retentive forces of double crowns within the first 18 mon ths. After this period the retention force should be still sufficient for dentur e retention. 2011 Springer-Verlag. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: Influence of implant inclina tion on retentive and lateral forces 2011, Clinical Oral Implants Research Close Yang T.-C. , Maeda Y. , Gonda T. , Kotecha S. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: Influence of implant inc lination on retentive and lateral forces Clinical Oral Implants Research, Volume 22, Issue 11, November 2011, Pages 1315-1319 View more articles Related reference work articles No articles found.

You might also like