• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 A Relic Reflects
Calculation, Logarithms, Slide rules, Modeling by©2006 James S Phillips
 Introduction
I hatched the notion of this little discourse at the end of the 2006 spring semester. In our department offices, we have on old classroom model of a Pickett demonstration slide rule (the predecessor to the TI84 with overhead projector screen). It has been in our department since Istarted my adjunct teaching career around 1994 and has become a bit of an oddity in this era.Most of my colleagues in the department know what it is, but have never actually used one for calculation. Occasional comments have been made about learning more about it. In addition,there has been some curiosity expressed by some of the engineering students about this “oldfashioned” calculator.Having started my undergraduate education in 1971, I had some personal experience withthis tool (as well as the CRC math tables) both in high school and college. My experience is notas extensive as you might think. In 1972, the first hand-held scientific calculator, the HP-35, wasintroduced. A year later, the HP-45, a more sophisticated model, came out. After observingclassmates using these calculators and seeing what a time saver they were, I forsook the slide ruleand purchased the HP-45. So my trusty old slide rule has lain dormant for some 35 years. Inever had the heart to dispose of it, so it continued traveling with me. Occasionally, I wouldopen its drawer, but never thought much about it. Now I have decided to reacquaint myself withmy old friend, at least for a short time. (
 It is interesting to note that my HP-45 died in about 7  years and was relegated to the rubbish heap long ago. It didn’t seem to evoke much sentimentality for me.)
As I began my research, I was surprised at what a passionate following the slide rule has.Several internet sites have plenty of information concerning usage instructions, types, models,history, and collector information. I was able to locate “newer” books as well as some oldclassroom manuals and histories. I came to realize that I really had nothing significant to add tothe discussion of slide rule, that hasn’t already been discussed in minute detail elsewhere.This made me question what the purpose of this short opus might be. After somedeliberation, I have chosen to broaden my topic a bit and discuss logarithms and their use in two
 page 1
 
specific applications. The first application will be the basic computation principles of logs andhow they are implemented on a slide rule. Included in this discussion, I will discuss thetrigonometric scales on the slide rule as well. The second application is mathematical modeling of data, primarily the use of logarithmic graph paper to derive exponential models and power curvesusing an extension of basic linear algebra. Both of these applications made the concept of logarithms and their use tangible to me as a student and were useful to me in my early years inindustry. I think for the students of today, logarithms are much more abstract and their relevancenot as clear. Because the act of calculation at this point in history requires only that the user input the numbers into a machine correctly and depress the appropriate operational key, there isvery little “thought” required on the part of the user. The act of calculation has become too easyin many respects. Now, this is not going to be another lament by an aging luddite. Though, after 15 years inengineering research and now 12 years of part and full time teaching, I do have some observationsI would like to make. The technology discussed here has been supplanted by something far  better. However, some of the estimation skills that allowed an individual to maintain someintuitive feel for the results of a calculation have, for the most part, disappeared. My discussionsdo not contain a lot of rigor, but I hope you enjoy the read.
 A Brief History
The old saw has it that “necessity is the mother of invention.” I would say that laziness (or should I say “effort reduction”) is the father of creativity. As proof, I would offer the followingquotes. The first from John Napier, the Baron of Merchiston in Scotland, in 1616:
Seeing there is nothing (right well beloved Students in Mathematickes) that is sotroublesome to Mathematicall practise, nor that doth more molest and hinder Calculators,then the Multiplications, Divisions, square and cubical Extractions of great numbers, whichbesides the tedious expence of time are for most part subject to many slippery errors. began therefore to consider in my minde, by what certaine and ready Art I might removethose hindrences.”
1
 
1
 
 Napier, John; A description of the Admirable Table of Logarithmes - London 1616; A Facsimile of the Old Englishtranslation of Mirifici logarithorum canonis descriptio 1614; Amsterdam, Theatrum Orbis Terrarum Ltd.; New York, DaCapo Press, 1969.
(spelling and punctuation as in Napier’s preface) page 2
 
How many of our students would believe that the inventor of logarithms, had it in his mind tomake their calculational life easier? Or how about this quote almost 300 years later from FlorianCajori:
“Of the machines for minimizing mental labor in computation, no device has been of  greater general interest than the slide rule.”
2
 
I would venture to say that now almost 100 yearsafter Florian, some might comment that with our electronic calculators and computers, that“mental labor” (or thought) in computation has been all but eliminated. Just look at the confusedclerk, next time you provide them $11.01 for a $5.46 purchase. Napier’s invention was first published in 1614, though there is evidence that he privatelycommunicated his work to a Danish astronomer, Tycho Brahe, in 1594.
3
Napier’s inventionconverted the operation of multiplication to addition and the operation of division to subtraction-- as long as you had a table of logarithms. Probably doesn’t seem like much of a step forwardfor the multiplication of single digit numbers (
 
3
×
6
), but think about the multiplication, by hand,of two six digit numbers (
 
123456
×
654321
). His initial set of logs were based on a geometricdefinition rather than a specific base (though it can be related to our natural logarithms
3
noted by
ln
in the equation
 NAP
=
10
7
ln10
7
 N 
 
 
 
 
 
 
, where NAP is the Naperian logarithm and N is the number of interest).Henry Briggs, a geometry professor at Gresham College in London and later at Oxford,collaborated with Napier and is given credit for developing the base 10 logs or common logs weuse today. In 1617, Briggs published tables of fourteen place logarithms for counting numbers 1to 1000. In 1624, the sequel to this effort was published, fourteen place logarithms from 1 to20,000 and from 90,000 to 100,000. And in 1628, a Dutch Bookseller, Adrian Vlacq, publisheda set of ten place logarithms for numbers 1 to 100,000
4,5
filling in the gaps of Briggs’ tables.As much of a help as this was, it was still cumbersome to carry the table of logarithmswherever you went. In 1620, Edmund Gunter, an astronomy professor also at Gresham College,developed a two foot long rule where the distances between the numbers were proportional totheir logarithms. To multiply two numbers, the user would use dividers to step along the scale toadd or subtract as necessary, much like addition and subtraction on a number line discussed in
2
 
Cajori, Florian; A history of the Logarithmic Slide Rule; The Engineering News Publishing Company, London, 1909
(the first sentence of the preface)
3
 
Thompson, J. E.; The Standard Manual of the Slide Rule, Its History, Principle and Operation, Second Edition; D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.; Toronto, New York, London; 1952
4
 
Boyer, C.B., revised bu Uta C. Merzbach; A History of Mathematics, Second Edition; John Wiley and Sons, 1989.
5
 
Clason, C. B.; Delights of the Slide Rule; Thomas Y. Cromwell Company, New York; 1964.
 page 3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...