• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
MessagePage
1 of 1
YoelTobin
From:
Yoel Tobin
Sent:
Monday, July 19, 2004 11:58 AM
To:
Chris
Kojm
Cc:
Tom Dowling; Nicole Grandrimo; Doug MacEachin; Melissa Coffey; Sarah Linden
Subject:
7-16 press guidance
Chris:
Attached
is
suggested press guidance from Team 1. This replaces what
we
sent
you on
Friday.
Thanks.
7/19/2004
 
ACCESS
Q.
Vice President Cheney said
he had
access
to
materials regarding
the al
Qaeda-Iraq
relationship
which
the
Commission
had not
seen. Have
you now
seen everything
the
White
Househas
seen?
How
confident
are you of
that?
A.
We
have reviewed
our
materials
and are
confident
that
we
have seen everything
the
White
House
has seen.
IRAQ
Q.
What
is the
true nature
of the
relationship
between
al
Qaeda
andIraq?
A.
We
believe that
al
Qaeda—Bin
Ladin—and
Iraq
had a
number
of
contacts spanning severalyears. There is evidence that the two sides discussed possible cooperation,
including
areported Iraqi
offer
of safehaven to Bin Ladin in the late
1990's.
However, it appears thatlittle, if anything concrete emerged from these contacts. Furthermore, we have seen noevidence that Iraq cooperated
with
Al
Qaeda
in
carrying
out any
attack
on the
United States
or
that either Iraq
or al
Qaeda ever provided support
for
violence against
the
United States
being
conducted unilaterally
by theother.
Q. Did
Iraq have
a
hand
in 9/11?
A. We
found
no
evidence that Iraq
was
involved
in the
9-11 attack.
Q. Why do the
Commission's findings
on
Iraq
differ
so
sharply
from
so
much press
and
other
public
commentary?A.
We
cannot speak
for the
press
and
various commentators.
We cantellyou
that
one of the
main
sources regarding Iraqi support
to al
Qaeda
has
recanted
his
claims.
The
Commission
thoroughly
investigated the
Iraq-al
Qaeda relationship. We had access to classified government
documents,
including material acquired
after
the
invasion
of
Iraq.
We
believe that
we
havedeveloped
and
presented
as accurate and
thorough
an
understanding
of
Iraq's pre-9/11
relationship to al Qaeda as is possible with the evidence currently available.
Q.
Many commentators have cited Zarqawi as an intermediary between Al Qaeda and Iraq.
What did the
Commission conclude?
A.
Whatever
his
subsequent role,
he
does
not
appear
to
figure
in
events prior
to the 9-11
attack.
 
IRAN
Q. You say
that Hezbollah
had a
hand
in
arranging transportation
for
several
of the 9/11
hijackers
through Iran.
Is it
possible that either Hezbollah
or
Iran
was
actually responsible
for
the
9/11
attacks?
A. We did not say
that Hezbollah
had a
hand
in
arranging transportation
for
several
of the
hijackers through Iran.
We did say
that some
of the
hijackers
transited
Iran
on
their
way in
and out of
Afghanistan,
and
that Hezbollah's precise role
in
that travel,
if
any, warrants
further
investigation
by the
U.S.
government. Regardless,
two
facts stand
out.
First, Iran
and
Hezbollah
did
provide
assistance
of
various types
to Al
Qaeda
in the
years before
9/11.
Second,
we
have
seen
nothing
to
indicate that Iran
or Hezbollah had any
knowledge
of the
9/11
planning,
or
that anyone other than
al
Qaeda planned
and executed
these terrible attacks.
Q. Are you
saying that while
the
Commission
found
no
compelling evidence
of
Iraqi
support
for
Al
Qaeda,
it did find
evidence
of
Hezbollah
and
Iranian
support?
A.
Yes,
we
found
that Iran
and
Hezbollah provided explosives training
to al
Qaeda operatives
inthe
early
1990's.
We
also
found
that,
after
Bin
Ladin's return
to
Afghanistan, Iran allowed
al
Qaeda operatives
to
freely
transit
its
territory
on
their
way to and
from
terrorist trainingcamps
in
Afghanistan. This transit
was
very
helpful
to al
Qaeda.
Q.
Doesn't this mean that Iran,
not
Iraq,
was Al
Qaeda's
main
foreign
patron?
A.
Al
Qaeda's
main foreign patrons were Sudan
and
then
the
Taliban.
Iran's
role
was
considerably
more limited
but it was
still
significant.
Q.
What
ishappening
today?
Are
Iran
and alQaeda still
cooperating?
Is
Iran harboring
al
Qaeda
officials?
A.
These
are
very important questions,
but
they take
us
beyond
the
Commission's mandate,
which
was to
investigate
the
facts
and
circumstances leading
up to
9/11.
OTHER COUNTRIES
Q.
What other countries
had
relationships with
al
Qaeda?
A.
Certainly
the
then governments
of
Sudan
and
Afghanistan both
had
strong relationships with
al
Qaeda. Both clearly provided
bin
Ladin with
a
place
to
live, train,
and run his
operations.
Al
Qaeda also
had a
strong relationship with individual Pakistani
officials
and
organizations,
although it is
unclear
how
much
of
this relationship
was the
product
of
formal
governmentdecisions.
In any
case,
al
Qaeda benefited enormously
from
Pakistani support
of the
Taliban.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...