Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
4 Way Analysis of Body Talk Technique on Body and Energy Fields (Abadi, Streeter)

4 Way Analysis of Body Talk Technique on Body and Energy Fields (Abadi, Streeter)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 126|Likes:
60 experimental group and 10 control participants were scanned before and after a ‘treatment’ or placebo session, with 5 different measuring systems. The scanning technologies were PIP, GDV, ESM, RFI and Temperature. Scans were blind analysed by leading experts in the specific technology and then compared to client and therapist comments. Most of the results were qualitative and so cross comparison was very complex. However overall there was significant change in PIP and GDV in comparison to the control group (see the following pages fro case specific examples). The body talk system that was used seemed to tap the specific area of issue, which corresponded with the client’s report and the therapist’s specific intuitive comments. In addition there were patterns located across scanning technologies, which supported the findings of the other, thus providing concurrent validity for the technology being used. Further research is suggest with regards to more participants and greater level of data control and experimental blinding.

80 participants were self selected randomly through local newspaper adverts and university notices to take part in research into a non invasive techniques and its effect on the Human energy and body field. Each participant was booked in for two appointments each lasting around 1 hr. Initially they arrived at the clinic and were assigned a participant number to maintain confidentiality. They completed their consultation form and then underwent the first round of 5 scans in a random order.
They were then show to a table where John Veltheim greeted them but did not speak to them about their issues. He spent between 5 and 15 minutes (at his discretion) with each client performing the advanced Body Talk technique. Throughout the treatment the therapist’s intuitive comments were being recorded by an assistant (found at the bottom of each client’s page). The participant was helped up and then rescanned with the same 5 devices, again in a random order. The control group went through the same process except they just lay on the couch for 10 minutes and were told that they were being treated, even though they were not. All clients were asked to return the following week to measure effects that took time to manifest.

Polycontrast Interference Photography (PIP)
For more detail see the below example detailed analysis written by an expert interpreter. The PIP machine is a light analysis technology (invented by Harry Oldfield) that is non invasive. It requires that naked skin be exposed to a full spectrum controlled lighting environment and the absorption and reflection intensities are colour coded and then analysed. 4 images were taken in the pre treatment scanning and 4 images taken in the post treatment scanning.
Images were then data coded and single blind analysed by one expert throughout the research. The PIP is most useful when analysing the body itself for congestions that appear on the surface above the specific organ or part of the body being investigated. Typically it is understood that the body will absorb more light (ie reflect less) where it has issues, in comparison to the rest of the participant’s body. We often refer to congestion and leakages when analysing these images.

Gas Discharge Visualisation (GDV)
A Digital version of Kirlian photography
invented by Konstantine Korotkov which
pulses a high voltage (very low current)
electrical charge through a charge couple
device upon which each finger of the hand is
placed. The image form each finger is then
extrapolated out to represent a specific
location on the body itself.
The images produced are an artificially
enhanced energy field print. It is a relatively
transient image and no two images are ever
exactly the same. The areas to pay attention
to are those that change dramatically from the
previous section. Also those areas that are
excessively close or far away from the body
itself. We often refer to distortion, cuts and field
60 experimental group and 10 control participants were scanned before and after a ‘treatment’ or placebo session, with 5 different measuring systems. The scanning technologies were PIP, GDV, ESM, RFI and Temperature. Scans were blind analysed by leading experts in the specific technology and then compared to client and therapist comments. Most of the results were qualitative and so cross comparison was very complex. However overall there was significant change in PIP and GDV in comparison to the control group (see the following pages fro case specific examples). The body talk system that was used seemed to tap the specific area of issue, which corresponded with the client’s report and the therapist’s specific intuitive comments. In addition there were patterns located across scanning technologies, which supported the findings of the other, thus providing concurrent validity for the technology being used. Further research is suggest with regards to more participants and greater level of data control and experimental blinding.

80 participants were self selected randomly through local newspaper adverts and university notices to take part in research into a non invasive techniques and its effect on the Human energy and body field. Each participant was booked in for two appointments each lasting around 1 hr. Initially they arrived at the clinic and were assigned a participant number to maintain confidentiality. They completed their consultation form and then underwent the first round of 5 scans in a random order.
They were then show to a table where John Veltheim greeted them but did not speak to them about their issues. He spent between 5 and 15 minutes (at his discretion) with each client performing the advanced Body Talk technique. Throughout the treatment the therapist’s intuitive comments were being recorded by an assistant (found at the bottom of each client’s page). The participant was helped up and then rescanned with the same 5 devices, again in a random order. The control group went through the same process except they just lay on the couch for 10 minutes and were told that they were being treated, even though they were not. All clients were asked to return the following week to measure effects that took time to manifest.

Polycontrast Interference Photography (PIP)
For more detail see the below example detailed analysis written by an expert interpreter. The PIP machine is a light analysis technology (invented by Harry Oldfield) that is non invasive. It requires that naked skin be exposed to a full spectrum controlled lighting environment and the absorption and reflection intensities are colour coded and then analysed. 4 images were taken in the pre treatment scanning and 4 images taken in the post treatment scanning.
Images were then data coded and single blind analysed by one expert throughout the research. The PIP is most useful when analysing the body itself for congestions that appear on the surface above the specific organ or part of the body being investigated. Typically it is understood that the body will absorb more light (ie reflect less) where it has issues, in comparison to the rest of the participant’s body. We often refer to congestion and leakages when analysing these images.

Gas Discharge Visualisation (GDV)
A Digital version of Kirlian photography
invented by Konstantine Korotkov which
pulses a high voltage (very low current)
electrical charge through a charge couple
device upon which each finger of the hand is
placed. The image form each finger is then
extrapolated out to represent a specific
location on the body itself.
The images produced are an artificially
enhanced energy field print. It is a relatively
transient image and no two images are ever
exactly the same. The areas to pay attention
to are those that change dramatically from the
previous section. Also those areas that are
excessively close or far away from the body
itself. We often refer to distortion, cuts and field

More info:

Published by: THE NIKOLA TESLA INSTITUTE on Oct 07, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/08/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 The World Peace Centre, MIT University, Pune, Indiawww.biofieldsciences.com 
 
The Centre fro Biofield Sciences. www.BioFieldScienes.com
1
Introduction
 
The following document outlines a piece of research carried out duringFebruary 2007, in India at the World Peace Centre, MIT University, Pune.This research is a collaboration between the Centre for Biofield Sciencesand The International Body Talk Association. The aim of the study was toresearch, through case study comparison, evidence for the effectiveness of the body talk system as delivered by the founder John Veltheim.
Document Contents
 
Journal Article of Research, p2-5
 
Analysis of Life, Background & Holistic Medicine, p6-8
 
Detailed PIP and GDV analysis guidelines, p9-16
 
Research Case Studies Experimental Group, p17-72
 
Research Case Studies Control Group, p73-81
 
References p82-84
 
The Centre fro Biofield Sciences. www.BioFieldScienes.com
2
A 4 way analysis of effectiveness of Body Talk technique on body and energy fields
Abadi, M.D & Streeter, T.W.J.SThe Centre for Biofield Studies, MIT University, Pune, India
 Abstract
60 experimental group and 10 control participants were scanned before and after a ‘treatment’ or 
 placebo session, with 5 different measuring systems. The scanning technologies were PIP, GDV,ESM, RFI and Temperature. Scans were blind analysed by leading experts in the specifictechnology and then compared to client and therapist comments. Most of the results werequalitative and so cross comparison was very complex. However overall there was significantchange in PIP and GDV in comparison to the control group (see the following pages fro casespecific examples). The body talk system that was used seemed to tap the specific area of issue,
which corresponded with the client’s report and the therapist’s specific intuitive comments. In
addition there were patterns located across scanning technologies, which supported the findings of the other, thus providing concurrent validity for the technology being used. Further research issuggest with regards to more participants and greater level of data control and experimental blinding.
Methodology
80 participants were self selected randomlythrough local newspaper adverts anduniversity notices to take part in research intoa non invasive techniques and its effect on theHuman energy and body field. Each participant was booked in for twoappointments each lasting around 1 hr.Initially they arrived at the clinic and wereassigned a participant number to maintainconfidentiality. They completed their consultation form and then underwent thefirst round of 5 scans in a random order.They were then show to a table where JohnVeltheim greeted them but did not speak tothem about their issues. He spent between 5and 15 minutes (at his discretion) with eachclient performing the advanced Body Talk technique. Throughout the treatment the
therapist’s intuitive comments were being
recorded by an assistant (found at the bottom
of each client’s page). The participant was
helped up and then rescanned with the same 5devices, again in a random order. The controlgroup went through the same process exceptthey just lay on the couch for 10 minutes andwere told that they were being treated, eventhough they were not. All clients were asked toreturn the following week to measure effects thattook time to manifest.
The Measures:Polycontrast Interference Photography (PIP)
For more detail see the below example detailedanalysis written by an expert interpreter. The PIPmachine is a light analysis technology (invented by Harry Oldfield) that is non invasive. Itrequires that naked skin be exposed to a fullspectrum controlled lighting environment andthe absorption and reflection intensities arecolour coded and then analysed. 4 images weretaken in the pre treatment scanning and 4 imagestaken in the post treatment scanning.Images were then data coded and single blindanalysed by one expert throughout the research.The PIP is most useful when analysing the bodyitself for congestions that appear on the surfaceabove the specific organ or part of the body being investigated. Typically it is understoodthat the body will absorb more light (ie reflectless) where it has issues, in comparison to the
rest of the participant’s body. We often refer to

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->