• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS)CAPITOL RECORDS, INC. et al.,)Plaintiffs,)Civ. Act. No. 03-cv-11661-NG)(LEAD DOCKET NUMBER)v.)) NOOR ALAUJAN,)Defendant.)))SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT )et al.,Plaintiffs,)Civ. Act. No 07-cv-11446-NG)(ORIGINAL DOCKET NUMBER)v.)JOEL TENENBAUM,))Defendants.))
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO THEDEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LAWYER-CONDUCTED VOIR DIRE
Plaintiffs do not object to the Defendant’s motion to allow
voir dire
to be conducted byattorneys for each party during the jury selection process. Plaintiffs similarly request that thisCourt permit such
voir dire
and examination of the jurors by the parties’ attorneys pursuant toFed. R. Civ. P. 47(a).
Case 1:03-cv-11661-NG Document 882 Filed 07/16/2009 Page 1 of 2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...