Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 14|Likes:

More info:

Published by: sorincristinelcriste on Oct 08, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Ancient Greeks and Memory
It is commonly believed that ancient people had much better memories than we have today. This makes agreat deal of sense to me. When you have no books to reference, no Google to search, no pen and paper with which to jot down a note, you better be really good at remembering.This explains how great lengthy epics could survive oral transmission for centuries. It explains why in hisdialogue
Plato has some criticism for this new-fangled writing everyone is talking about. Hesays that literacy, far from making us smarter, will make us less wise.Their trust in writing, produced by external characters which are no part of themselves, will discouragethe use of their own memory within them. You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding.Plato is saying that if you can write things down, your memory will suffer. Given that context, consider aGreek named Simonides of Ceos. Simonides was a poet who lived around 600 BC. There is an interestingstory about him. Although the veracity of the story is in dispute, whether or not it happened in exactly thisway is not germane to the point I want to make. The antiquity of the story is not in question, since itappears in the writing of Cicero.The story begins with Simonides being hired by a Thessalian nobleman named Scopas to write a poem inhis honor. The final work included extensive praise for the twin gods Castor and Pollux. Scopas, thinkinghe received only half the credit in the poem, told Simonides he was only going to pay half the fee and if the poet wanted the other half, he should collect it from Castor and Pollux.Later that evening, Simonides was at a banquet and word was sent to him that two young men wereoutside looking for him. He went to the door and didn’t see anyone, so he went outside to look around for them. While he was outside, the roof of the house caved in and killed everyone inside. The implication of the story was that Castor and Pollux, knowing of the imminent collapse of the roof, had come calling withthe purpose of saving Simonides’ life as their payment for his poem.This is the part of the story that I find interesting. Although the bodies of the dead were mangled andunrecognizable, even by their families, the poet Simonides was able to close his eyes and recall whereeveryone was sitting at the banquet.The story is recounted as an object lesson on how to remember large groups of items. By associating themwith a physical location, the mind can retain a great deal of information. There is a technique you can tryto demonstrate this. Get someone to write down a random twenty-digit number. Then imagine a walk through your house or a place you know very well. Walk through the house in your mind, from room toroom, mentally placing a single digit of your twenty-digit number in each room. By doing this, you canrecall the number by simply walking back through the house, each location triggering your memory.Whether this story happened or not I do not know, but the point is that Simonides’ ability to recall thenames of everyone at a large banquet, and where they were sitting, was deemed completely possible andused as a lesson to demonstrate a practical skill.All of this to say that two thousand years ago, people likely had much better memories than we have now.Of course, we are still capable of this kind of memory; we simply don’t train our brains to do this particular task. If you went back in time and talked to these people, to Simonides and to Plato, and youtold them that there would be a day in the future where people will have access to all of the information inthe world through books and the Internet, but that the cost of this was a substantially lessened memory, I believe they would have said, “No thank you. That seems creepy. My memory is a big part of who I amand I have no desire to trade any of it away.”This is an example of how technology changes how we think. How it changes us. While we believe weare better off than Plato and Simonides, they may disagree. I expect that as technology continues to

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->