• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
   L   O   R   O   N   A   S   T   E   I   N   E   R   D   U   C   A   R ,   L   T   D .
   A   T   T   O   R   N   E   Y   S   A   T   L   A   W   3   0   0   3   N   O   R   T   H   C   E   N   T   R   A   L   A   V   E   N   U   E ,   S   U   I   T   E   1   8   0   0   P   H   O   E   N   I   X ,   A   R   I   Z   O   N   A   8   5   0   1   2  -   3   9   0   9   (   6   0   2   )   2   7   7  -   3   0   0   0
Lorona Steiner Ducar, Ltd.3003 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2909Telephone: (602) 277-3000Facsimile: (602) 277-7478
Jess A. Lorona, #009186Gregory E. McClure, #022587Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTIN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONAJeffrey Michael Pataky
, an individualPlaintiff,-vs-
City of Phoenix
, a political subdivisionof the State of Arizona;
Phillip B.Gordon and Jane Doe Gordon
,husband and wife;
Frank Fairbanks and Jane DoeFairbanks
, husband and wife;
Jack Harris and Jane Doe Harris
, husbandand wife;
Steven Boeck and Jane DoeBoeck 
, husband and wife;
TheronQuaas and Jane Doe Quaas
, husbandand wife;
John and Jane Does I-X;
Defendants.
Case No. CV09-534-PHXCOMPLAINT
 Plaintiff, JEFFREY MICHAEL PATAKY, by and through his counselundersigned, hereby alleges as follows for his Complaint against Defendants:
PARTIES AND JURISDICTION
1.Plaintiff, JEFFREY MICHAEL PATAKY (“Plaintiff”), is, at all timesrelevant, a resident of Maricopa County, Arizona.
1
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
   L   O   R   O   N   A   S   T   E   I   N   E   R   D   U   C   A   R ,   L   T   D .
   A   T   T   O   R   N   E   Y   S   A   T   L   A   W   3   0   0   3   N   O   R   T   H   C   E   N   T   R   A   L   A   V   E   N   U   E ,   S   U   I   T   E   1   8   0   0   P   H   O   E   N   I   X ,   A   R   I   Z   O   N   A   8   5   0   1   2  -   3   9   0   9   (   6   0   2   )   2   7   7  -   3   0   0   0
2.Defendant, CITY OF PHOENIX, is, at all times relevant, a politicalsubdivision of the State of Arizona, located in Maricopa County, Arizona.3.Defendants, PHILLIP B. GORDON (“Mayor Gordon”) and JANE DOEGORDON, are, at all times relevant, husband and wife residing in MaricopaCounty, Arizona. Defendant Phillip Gordon holds the position of Mayor inand for the City of Phoenix. All actions taken by Defendant Phillip Gordonwere on behalf of the marital community.4.Defendants, FRANK FAIRBANKS (“Mr. Fairbanks”) and JANE DOEFAIRBANKS, are, at all times relevant, husband and wife residing inMaricopa County, Arizona. Defendant Frank Fairbanks holds the position of City Manager in and for the City of Phoenix. All actions taken byDefendant Frank Fairbanks were on behalf of the marital community.5.Defendants, JACK HARRIS (“Chief Harris”) and JANE DOE HARRIS,are, at all times relevant, husband and wife residing in Maricopa County,Arizona. Defendant Jack Harris holds the position of Chief of Police in andfor the City of Phoenix. All actions taken by Defendant Jack Harris were on behalf of the marital community.6.Defendants, STEVEN BOECK (“Boeck”) and JANE DOE BOECK, are, atall times relevant, husband and wife residing in Maricopa County, Arizona.At all times relevant, Defendant Steven Boeck held a position with the Cityof Phoenix Police Department. All actions taken by Defendant StevenBoeck were on behalf of the marital community.
2
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
   L   O   R   O   N   A   S   T   E   I   N   E   R   D   U   C   A   R ,   L   T   D .
   A   T   T   O   R   N   E   Y   S   A   T   L   A   W   3   0   0   3   N   O   R   T   H   C   E   N   T   R   A   L   A   V   E   N   U   E ,   S   U   I   T   E   1   8   0   0   P   H   O   E   N   I   X ,   A   R   I   Z   O   N   A   8   5   0   1   2  -   3   9   0   9   (   6   0   2   )   2   7   7  -   3   0   0   0
7.Defendants, THERON QUAAS (“Detective Quaas”) and JANE DOEQUAAS, are, at all times relevant, husband and wife residing in MaricopaCounty, Arizona. At all times relevant, Defendant Quaas held the positionof Detective in and for the City of Phoenix Police Department in the FamilyInvestigations Bureau. All actions taken by Defendant Quaas were on behalf of the marital community.8.Defendants, JOHN and JANE DOES I-X, are, at all times relevant to thisComplaint, reside in Maricopa County, Arizona. Plaintiff will seek leave of the Court to add their true names once their identity has become known.9.Subject matter jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.10.Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391, venue is proper in this Court.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
11.Plaintiff incorporates each and every allegation set forth above as if fully setforth herein.12.In or about April, 2008, Plaintiff began posting information to a websiteknown by the domain namehttp://www.badphoenixcops.com (“Badphoenixcops”).13. Plaintiff’s postings initially dealt mainly with his malicious and unfair treatment by the City of Phoenix Police Department regarding a trumped updomestic violence offense.14.Plaintiff has previously filed a separate Notice of Claim and litigation in theDistrict Court for the District of Arizona under the caption,
 Jeffrey M.
3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...