• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 5
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
FLUNKING The DEBUNKERBy William Lyne(A response to "Bobdee's"/Clark Daniel's"Debunking William Lyne" at Scribd.com)This response is called for because of the misleading and defamatory effect of thearticle, "Debunking William Lyne", at Scribd.com, based on Clark Daniel's("Bobdee's") misinterpretation not only of what I said in my book, Occult EtherPhysics: Tesla's Secret Space Propulsion System and the Conspiracy to Conceal It,but also his misinterpretation of what Nikola Tesla said. Clark Daniel has"debunked" no one except himself, as the documentation will show.Opportunistic sociopaths always look for weakness to "pounce on" to makethemselves look better. A few weeks ago Clark Daniel barged into theteslaflyingmachine@yahoo.com forum-obviously thinking that he knew more aboutTesla than he did-and unsuccessfully tried to create a divide-and-conquer "wedge"between members of the forum and myself, but could get nowhere. Being a degreedelectrical engineer who was a recent convert to what he thought was "naturalphilosophy", he decided to try out his new natural philosophy "wings" on us, andfailed. First, he tried denying that Nikola Tesla ever said (emphasis mine)-"The most probable medium filling all space is one consisting of independentcarriers immersed in an insulating fluid." (1)Because of Clark's misinterpretations and false conclusions, he was an annoyance.His denial went on for several days, until we proved that yes, Tesla made thatstatement. Having failed in that, he then tried to split hairs by saying thatTesla was referring to the "air" as the ether's "insulating fluid" ("fluid"?) Ashis "proof", he presented a completely different statement by Tesla, regarding theair, in which he said in pertinent part (emphasis mine)-"But the action, as explained, implies that the air is insulating-that is, that itis composed of independent carriers immersed in an insulating medium." (2)(Note the difference here, where Tesla described the ether, then the air-differentthings-in similar but different terms. But Daniel doesn't see that difference, andseems deluded, insisting that the two obviously different statements refer to thesame thing.)Tesla was referring to a "fluid" in relation to the ether, and a "medium" inrelation to the air. (He was only stating the obvious since even an idiot who hasexperimented with an electrostatic generator knows that the charges would neverbuild up if the air was conductive, and besides, we would all get the hell shockedout of us every time an electrical appliance is turned on.)It has pretty much been standard parlance for quite some time for the ether to bereferred to as an "incompressible fluid", but Daniel apparently doesn't realizethat either, because he also launched into a big steamy and stinky load of totallyunrelated "theorization" that Tesla's space propulsion system "created a vacuum"in front, and "pressure" in the back, in the ether, to propel the ship. A sort of
 
"push-pull" idea which is wrong. Since the ether is also said to fill all space,how could Daniel's (not Tesla's) ether "composed of independent carriers immersedin the air" exist in outer space? It couldn't.In another statement, in which he elucidated further on this point, Tesla said, inpertinent part (emphasis mine)---"What impresses the investigator in the course of these experiences is thebehavior of gases when subjected to great rapidly alternating electrostaticstresses. But he must remain in doubt as to whether the effects observed are duewholly to the molecules, or atoms, of the gas which chemical analysis discloses tous, or whether there enters into play another medium of a gaseous nature,comprising atoms, or molecules, immersed in a fluid pervading all space." (3)(In the first part of the above statement Tesla was referring to the atmosphericgases, as compared to the ether in the last part, in regard to rapidly alternatingelectrostatic stresses.)Speaking of "the ether in all space", Tesla continued (in pertinent part, emphasismine)---"...only a homogeneous, incompressible, and elastic fluid-such as the ether issupposed to be-would remain." (4)So now we see, with no doubt as to Tesla's meaning, the crux of the problem.Daniel fundamentally cannot discern between when Tesla was referring to what heconsidered to be the properties of the ether, and when Tesla was referring to theproperties of the air. Being unable to understand the difference, he simplyconfuses the two, failing to comprehend that Tesla considered that the etherconsists of "...independent carriers immersed in an insulating fluid", while atthe same time, considering that the air is "...composed of independent carriersimmersed in an insulating medium."It just goes to show that even an education in electrical engineering did notprepare Daniel to deal with the subtleties of Tesla's thoughts. He does notunderstand that, according to Tesla, the ether, whether in the atmosphere or inouter space, is composed of independent carriers immersed in its own insulatingfluid, while the air-not in outer space-is also composed of independent carriers(of much, much larger size and mass) immersed in an insulating medium.In another slanted argument (citing Wikipedia), Daniel referred to a drawing fromNikola Tesla's patent #723,188, Method for Signaling (from page 197, my bookPentagon Aliens) stating that an oscillating high frequency electromagneticdipole, tuned to three-eights (or one-quarter) wavelength, produces only "an A.C.node". This flies in the face of the fact well-documented (from a standardelectrical engineering text) in the first edition of my 1993 book Space AliensFrom the Pentagon-"...an oscillating electric dipole consists of two equal and opposite charges ofdipole moment p, where p oscillates sinusoidally with time. A dipole which istuned to 3/8th (or 1/4, the same) will continue to throw out energy even when theconditions are reversed, because there is a time lag between changes in charge andcurrent distribution." (5)
 
So Daniel's "node" is not really there, and what results is negative electrostaticdischarges, D.C. in sign. Most schlubs would assume that the dipole is "supposed"to produce an A.C. node, but it does not do so at sufficiently high frequency,because of this phenomenon, which Tesla knew about in the 1890s, which is why hecalled his single terminal ("pancake") coil "...my method for producing directcurrent with an alternating current."Daniel simply refuses to understand Tesla, posturing himself as knowing betterthan Tesla what he meant! And the real problem with Daniel is that he reallydoesn't appear to know how to read. For example, I didn't say that Tesla did notconsider the ether as gaseous as Daniel falsely concluded, but only that it wasn'tthe "half-hearted gaseous ether of Lorentz". See what I mean? False conclusions.What I have tried to do in Occult Ether Physics is to dig Tesla's Dynamic Theoryof Gravity out of the shadows of government secrecy, because the theory was neverpublished in complete detail, and the government has this and many other Teslasecrets locked away in an underground vault beneath the J. Robert OppenheimerResearch Center in Los Alamos, New Mexico. These secrets have been beyond thepublic's reach since 1943 when Tesla died. But the main effort of my book was toreconstruct Tesla's UFO propulsion technology, which is naturally related to hisDTOG.I discovered in my research that Tesla's technology was the same or similar tothat of J. J. Thomson. (6) I know this because Tesla never disputed Thomson'sElectromagnetic Momentum Theory, never said a word about it. Tesla never failed todispute a theory if he thought it was false. Ergo, he agreed with it but didn'twant to discuss it. As they say in the law, "He waived any objection to it, andcan thereby be deemed to have accepted it as true." Tesla did take Thomson to taskin regard to another issue, the production of fluorescence in gases in glass tubesat low pressures. In that case (7), Tesla proposed that electrostatics was betterthan electrodynamics, to which Thomson agreed!Tesla's stony silence on the Thomson theory was because Thomson was letting thecat out of the bag, and any statements Tesla could have made would only have madematters worse, because this was Tesla's biggest secret.A Third Revised Edition of Occult Ether Physics is being published in the Russianlanguage, to be sold in the Russian-reading world. An English language version ofmy Third Edition will be issued in the near future in America.I have to admit that I really don't mind rubbing it in, but Clark Daniel is,according to documentation, wrong, wrong, a thousand times wrong. When he bit thisoff, he should have considered whether or not it was more than he could chew. Andperhaps he should sign up for a remedial reading class, as well as basicphilosophy 101. After all, "natural philosophy" employs logic.William Lyne, Author of Occult Ether Physics, Pentagon Aliens, and Occult ScienceDictatorship.End Notes:1. T. C. Martin, The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla; Lecturebefore the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London (1892).2. T. C. Martin (supra)
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
philosoph9

Here is a recent post on the teslaflyingmachine@yahoo.com forum from Dangerradiation@yahoo.com: "I found the number for "The University of Texas School of Law" in Austin Texas, and I phoned them today. I spoke with two gentlemen during this call. The first one said a few people had contacted there asking about Mr. Lyne and his attending there in 1966. He explained that though their records, it is certain that William R. Lyne DID attend class there in 1966 but did NOT graduate. This totally dovetails with what William Lyne wrote about. I spoke with another man, and he said he'd provide me with a document of attendance, but will have to dig into the microfilm archive. He said he'd send me the document and it'd be no problem. I learned a valuable lesson about attention seeking, credibility eating jerks like this Bob guy. I got my first taste of unadulterated LIES. He provided a screenshot and a long explanation on his site. I could have believed him, but I am not that gullible. So I went and got the information directly from the horse's mouth. This is researching..... properly! When I get that document, I'll post it up for all to see."

reply08 / 13 / 2009
philosoph9

The post immediately below proves the truth of what I said in the post previous to that. This jerk's dishonesty is psychotic, as he is a sociopath.

reply08 / 13 / 2009
philosoph9

The knockout punch to bobdee1001's dishonest post, "Debunking William Lyne" was delivered by William Lyne's "Flunking the Debunker". bobdee1001 (Clark Daniel) is a poor loser with sour grapes. He will keep posting more gibberish in response to this. The documentation clearly showed that Daniel's allegations were false.

reply08 / 12 / 2009
bobdee1001

This atricle is full of lies and doctored quotes. These are exposed in my latest article entitled: Reply to: Flunking the Debunker

reply08 / 09 / 2009
bobdee1001

More Lies! This guy never stops. My reply will be ready soon. - Bobdee

reply07 / 29 / 2009
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...