UNITED STATE! IRNATIONAL TRADE COMMI: WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable Theodore R. Essex Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of: CERTAIN SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS HAVING SYNCHRONOUS DYNAMIC. Investigation No. 337-TA-661 RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY CONTROLLERS AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING TRIAL TESTIMONY AND THE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMON ‘Complainant Rambus, Inc. and Respondents' (collectively, “the Parties”) respectfully request that the Administrative Law Judge take notice that the Parties have stipulated as follows: (1) The Parties will make their current employees available to testify at the hearing in this ‘matter without requiring the issuance of a trial subpoena, (2) Alll depositions or other swom testimony in the Rambus Related Actions (defined below) that has been produced in discovery in this investigation may be used by any Party in this investigation in lieu of live testimony, and no Party will oppose admissibility of any such testimony based on failure to comply with Commission Rule 210.28(h). "NVIDIA Corporation, Asustek Computer Inc., Asus Computer International, Inc., BFG Technologies, Inc., Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) Corporation, Biostar Microtech International Corporation, Diablotek Inc., EVGA Corporation, G.B.T. Inc., Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd., Hewlett-Packard Company, MSI Computer Corporation, Micro-Star International Company. Lid., Palit Multimedia Inc., Palit Microsystems Ltd., Pine Technology Holdings, Ltd., and Sparkle Computer Company, Ltd. (collectively, “Respondents”)By entering into these stipulations, the Parties do not waive any of their rights, including the right to challenge the necessity of any witness's presence at trial and including the right to object to prior testimony on any grounds other Rule 210,28(h), The “Rambus Related Actions” are the following: 1. Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc., et al.; Samsung Electronics Co., et al.; and Nanya Technology Corporation, et al., Case No. C 05-00334 RMW in the District Court for the Northern District of California; 2. Rambus Ine. v. Samsung Electronics Co., et al. Case No. C 05-02298 RMW in the District Court for the Northern District of California: 3. Rambus Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al., Case No. C 05-00244 RMW in the District Court for the Northern District of California: 4. Hynix Semiconductor Inc., et al. v. Rambus Ine., Case No. C 00-20905 RMW in the Distriet Court for the Northern District of California; 5. Rambus Ine. v. Infineon Technologies AG, et al., Case No. 3:00CV524 in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; 6. Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc., Case No, 00-792-JJF in the Distriet Court for the District of Delaware; 7. In the Matter of Rambus Ine., Docket No. 9302 before the Federal Trade Commission; 8. Rambus Ine. v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al., Case No. 04-431105 in the Superior Court of the State of California: 9. Samsung Electronics Ltd. v. Rambus, Ine., No. 3:05-CV-00406 in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; and 10, This investigation STIPULATION RE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY—P AGE 2Dated: July 1, 2009 Dated: July 16, 2009 Respectfully submitted, FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Sates blues [by peri Doris Johnson Hines Christine E. Lehman Kathleen A. Daley Naveen Modi Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: 202-408-4000 Facsimile: 202-408-4400 ATTORNEYS FOR COMPLAINANT Respectfully submitted, FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Andrew R. Kopsidas Jefirey R. Whieldon Kori Anne Bagrowski Peter J. Sawert FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20003 ‘Telephone: 202-783-5070 Facsimile: 202-783-2331 Anita E. Kadala Wasif Qureshi FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800 Houston, TX 77010 STIPULATION RE ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY—P AGE 3