• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
MITIP 2009, 15-16 October, Bergamo 
Abstract submitted to MITIP2009, stream: Supply Chain Risk Management, topic: Enterprise Risk Management 
FROM RISKS SUPPLY CHAINS TO RISKS IN VIRTUAL ENTERPRISE NETWORKS:IDEAS, CONCEPTS AND A FRAMEWORK
Jan HUSDAL
Møreforsking Molde / Molde Research Institute Britv 4, 6411, Molde Norway E-mail: jan.husdal@himolde.no 
Abstract:
Is managing risks in Virtual Enterprise Networks different from managing risks in supply chains? It is not unusual for suppliers in asupply chain to come together and act as a Virtual Enterprise Network (VEN) and today’s supply chains exhibit many VEN-like features.Looking at VEN risk management from the perspective of supply chain risk management, current ideas on VENs will serve as a baseonto which ideas on supply chain risk will be transposed. Many concepts related to supply chain risk will be explored and related to theirpossible VEN counterparts: risk, vulnerability, robustness, flexibility, resilience and business continuity. Conceptual in its approach anddrawing from other areas of research, this paper introduces four distinct groups of VENS, namely Constrained, Directed, Limited andFree VEN, and concludes that VEN risk management can and should learn from supply chain risk management.
Keywords:
Virtual enterprise network, supply chain, risk, vulnerability, resilience.
1. INTRODUCTION
Traditional enterprises can enter into various forms of cooperation without necessarily establishing what is called a VEN[26]. Already more than 15 years ago the shape of today’s virtual enterprise networks began to emerge [25]. In the late1980s the term ‘virtual corporation’ began to appear for the first time, referring to invisible or virtual links betweencompanies in the form of information and communication technology [3], [4], [9], [12]. The definitions and descriptions ofvirtual enterprises vary [8], ranging from with the purpose of a VEN [13], to primarily management and structure [2].Others again deviate from ICT as the binding glue of a virtual corporation and focus on the organizational and co-operational characteristics of a VEN [30]. A VEN is a time-limited structure; it has a set life-cycle., i.e. the duration of aproject or business opportunity in which the participating enterprises partake [29]. This life cycle perspective posescertain challenges in how to manage VENs [18], [19], [31] and risks in a VEN [10], [23], since the risks may change fromproject to project or opportunity to opportunity.
2. A
 
VEN
 
CLASSIFICATION
 
SCHEME
A VEN is a network of a number of member enterprises and their individual competencies. These two dimensions,number of members, and individual competencies or skills can be used to set up a classification scheme for VENs: In a
constrained 
VEN there are only few members with few skills which the VEN has to depend on, it is therefore constrainedin its scope. A VEN with many members, but with a small collective skill set can be seen as a
limited 
VEN, because offew types of although many business opportunities it can engage in. A VEN with few members, but with a wide range ofindividual skills can be seen as a
directed 
VEN since it is highly dependent on or directed towards these members whenseeking business opportunities. The ideal or
free 
VEN is a VEN that has many members with a wide range of collectiveskills.
Figure 1: A VEN classification scheme 
3. FROM
 
SUPPLY
 
CHAIN
 
RISK
 
TO
 
VEN
 
RISK
Risk is an ambiguous concept and there are many definitions of risk, depending on their specific application and on theirsituational context. To understand risks in a VEN it is necessary to first look at the basics of risk and risk management[10], [11], [16], apply it to supply chains [5], [6], [15], [16], [24], [25], and then transfer it to VENs.
 
MITIP 2009, 15-16 October, Bergamo 
Abstract submitted to MITIP2009, stream: Supply Chain Risk Management, topic: Enterprise Risk Management 
While it is possible to take the views in [5], [6] into a VEN, one of the difficulties in transferring points of views from therealm of supply chains to the realm of VENs is that a supply chain is a directed system with a finite number of individualmembers, while a VEN is a fleeting entity with a dynamic shape, constantly changing according to the needs of thebusiness opportunities.The perspective employed by [15] is probably the one best transferrable to a VEN setting: 1) Organizational risks that areinternal to the VEN members and the customers in the business opportunity, 2) Network risks that relate to the overallprocesses in the business opportunity, starting with the VEN members and ending with the customer, and 3)Environmental risks outside of the structure of VEN – Customer – Business Opportunity.
4. STRATEGIES
 
FOR
 
MANAGING
 
VEN
 
RISKS
In the recent literature, several “buzzwords” have been linked to supply chain risk and disruption management in variousways, among which are robustness, flexibility, agility and resilience [1], [20], [21], [22], [27]. These concepts need to beexplained both from a supply chain perspective as well as a VEN perspective. Flexibility or agility, robustness andresilience are different sides of the same coin, yet at the same time distinctively different animals.
5. VEN
 
RISK
 
AND
 
VULNERABILITY
Taking into account the views in [5], [6], [7], along with the views in [14], [15] and [22], we can now construct a frameworkfor risk and vulnerability in a VENs as below, showing how the vulnerability of a VEN is determined by its structural andorganizational characteristics, analogous to the framework for risk and vulnerability in supply chains used in [14]. On oneside, the VEN is subject to certain potential disruptions, coming from a set of risk sources. On the other side, the VENhas certain characteristics, which make up the VEN vulnerability.
Figure 2: A framework for analyzing VEN Risk and Vulnerability 
The risk side is divided into four risk categories: 1) supply-side risk, 2) operational risks, 3) demand-side risks and 4)external risks. The vulnerability side is divided into two: 1) structural and 2) organizational characteristics. The termstructural refers first and foremost to the four categories of VEN, while the term organizational refers to the VEN-internalpreparedness, with management and information technology as the binding force between structure and organization.These two elements, structure and organization, determine the degree of adaptability or the capacity the VEN possessesfor dealing with or handling disruptions that might occur.
6. CONCLUSION
This paper attempts to interface supply chain perspectives with VEN perspectives, showing how risks management insupply chains can apply to risk management in VENs. The discussion is kept at an executive level, and in a ponderingmanner seeking to give strategic advice on the intersection of two much related research areas.In conclusion it must be said that a VEN is a business entity, not a supply chain. Supply chains are competitive, VENsare collaborative. Approaching VENs from a supply chain perspective can assist in defining the risks and challenges aVEN faces and how to manage them, particularly since many of the traditional supply chain risks stem from a lack ofcollaboration and visibility, the hallmarks of VENs, making a VEN perhaps the ideal setup for supply chains and makingsupply chain risk management practices a fertile ground for researching VEN risk management.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...