• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
Transport network vulnerability –which terminology and metricsshould we use?
Nectar Cluster 1 Seminar
 
1
 
12 -13 May 2005 Molde, Norway
Jan Husdal
Molde Research Institute
 
Jan Husdal
holds an MSc in
Geographic Information Systems Geographic Information Systems 
(GIS)from the University of Leicester, UK, 2000, focussing on
least least- -cost paths cost paths 
and
network analysis network analysis 
has been working with issues related to risk assessment,vulnerability analysis and community planning since 1989,working for several regional government agencies,
before before 
2
 
has since 2004 served as a member of the programcommittee on
European Policy and Research European Policy and Research 
with the
Association for European Transport,Association for European Transport,AET AET 
was in 2005 appointed as member of the
Transportation Transportation Economics Committee ABE20 Economics Committee ABE20 
with the TransportationTransportationResearch Board,Research Board,
TRB TRB 
 
Background I –RISIT (2002-2007)
The transport sector ingeneral has very limitedexperience with regard torisk based management
Cost-benefit analyses andenvironmental impactanalyses are being used, butrisk analses and risk
 
3
 acceptance criteria are not.
Risk and vulnerability as a Risk and vulnerability as a concept and as a concept and as a management tool has no management tool has no marked tradition among the marked tradition among the Norwegian road authorities Norwegian road authorities or amongst the international or amongst the international road authorities road authorities 
www.program.forskningsradet.no/risit/
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...