Upload_transparent

Using Neural Networks to Model the Behavior and Decisions of Gamblers, in Particular, Cyber-Gamblers

 
 
 
 
 
Download PDF FREE
Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 18 43
Words: 8941 13640
Characters: 57816 81678
Lines: 387 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.47 5.99
Words per line: 23.1 21.89
Words per page: 496.72 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

3,417 Reads | 2 Comments

Description

J Gambl Stud. 2009 Jul 11. [Epub ahead of print]

Chan VK.

This article describes the use of neural networks (a type of artificial intelligence) and an empirical data sample of, inter alia, the amounts of bets laid and the winnings/losses made in successive games by a number of cyber-gamblers to longitudinally model gamblers' behavior and decisions as to such bet amounts and the temporal trajectory of winnings/losses. The data was collected by videoing Texas Holdem gamblers at a cyber-gambling website. Six "persistent" gamblers were identified, totaling 675 games. The neural networks on average were able to predict bet amounts and cumulative winnings/losses in successive games accurately to three decimal places of the dollar. A more important conclusion is that the influence of a gambler's skills, strategies, and personality on his/her successive bet amounts and cumulative winnings/losses is almost totally reflected by the pattern(s) of his/her winnings/losses in the few initial games and his/her gambling account balance. This partially invalidates gamblers' illusions and fallacies that they can outperform others or even bankers. For government policy-makers, gambling industry operators, economists, sociologists, psychiatrists, and psychologists, this article provides models for gamblers' behavior and decisions. It also explores and exemplifies the usefulness of neural networks and artificial intelligence at large in the research on gambling.

Pdf_16x16 18 Pages


Date Added

07/19/2009

Category
Tags
Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect

openid_Vpvvpxer

openid_Vpvvpxer

If I read this correctly, the author claims to have predicted the actions of HoldEm poker players without any knowledge of their hole cards. Makes no sense whatsoever, I smell a huge rat here.

11/10/2009
beepbeepimajeep

beepbeepimajeep

Ok, let's just ingnor the sample size for a moment... " more important conclusion is that the influence of a gambler's skills, strategies, and personality on his/her successive bet amounts and cumulative winnings/losses is almost totally reflected by the pattern(s) of his/her winnings/losses in the few initial games and his/her gambling account balance. This partially invalidates gamblers' illusions and fallacies that they can outperform others or even bankers." Outperform bankers? The game was Texas Holdem - there are no bankers. Furthermore players who know they have a skill advantage over their opponents will deliberately play in a predictable manner, knowing that it won't be expoited, in order to maximize their exploitation of their opponents tendancies. If the sample contained good players who didn't have such knowledge/belief, then they would have resorted to game theory in order to distribute their actions in such a way as to not be profitably exploitable - all their actions would have either had statistically valid multiple interpretations, or they would have been offering indiffernce options to their opponents. Hard to take this research seriously when they seem to have overlooked the basics of game theory.

07/23/2009