Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
008 Coast Guard - Petition for Redress of Grievances

008 Coast Guard - Petition for Redress of Grievances

Ratings:

4.5

(2)
|Views: 262 |Likes:
Published by meadow muffins
government abuse
government abuse

More info:

Published by: meadow muffins on Jul 20, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/11/2013

pdf

text

original

 
PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCESWITHINTHE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE III SECTION 1ANDTHE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I SECTION 10
From:Douglas-Mac: Duff,
 sui juris
c/o 3733 Highway 43 SouthHarrison, Arkansas Republic [72601]Petition To:Commandant (G-OPL)U.S. Coast Guard2100 2nd St. SWWashington, DC 20593-0001
SUBJECT MATTER:
CIVIL LIBERTIES, LOCAL COURTS IN THE TERRITORIES &POSSESSIONS, JUDICIAL PROCEDINGS, CIVIL, CRIMINAL, & GENERALLY,INTERSTATE COMPACTS & OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTS SPECIFICALLY.VIOLATION OF RULES OF LAWVIOLATION OF THE INTERSTATE COMPACTDISREGARD FOR JUDICIAL PROCEDINGSOBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY LOCAL COURTSCIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION UNDER OBLIGATION OF CONTRACTLACK OF JURISDICTION OVER NON-U.S. CITIZEN – 
FEDERAL QUESTION
[Claimantmade it explicitly known that he is NOT a U.S. citizen or a 14
th
Amendment citizen claiming“privileges” and that Claimant
IS
a
Category 4 Treaty Native American
with full ability tocontract. This “benefit of the contract” is what was taken from Claimant under 
vi et armis
.]
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > Sec. 1. > Sec. 4.
Sec. 4. - Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of theUnited States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or 
military authority under the United States
, shall be fined under this titleor imprisoned not more than three years, or both.33CFR1Subpart 1.07--Enforcement; Civil and Criminal Penalty Proceedings.CHAPTER I--COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONThe above named Petitioner has cause to notify the Office of the
United States Coast Guard 
for a
 
claim of injury and pattern of un-Lawful activity. This injury was committed within a “Politicalsubdivision “of the “State” by “THE STATE OF ARKANSAS” under provisions of the War Powers Act and Title 50 section 1621”Declaration of national emergency”. These administrativecourts have failed to meet “Full Faith and Credit” obligations of contract that have a nation wideimplication within the NDR Act of 1982. As the injured party, I claim a Right of Reviewactionable within the United States Code TITLE 5 > PART I > CHAPTER 7 >,§ 702. Right of review. This Practice of Law TITLE 28 > PART I > CHAPTER 21 > § 454 and TITLE 28 >PART III > CHAPTER 41 > § 607, violates Article I section 10 “Obligation of Contract” and is by definition a “Bill of Attainder”.Issues to be resolved that would bring the “Political Subdivisions” of the State of Arkansas into“Full Faith and Credit” compliance with the other compact States is the requirement that all civilservice elected or appointed (Arkansas Revised Statutes), have Lawful Oath of Office asaffidavit on file that defines venue and jurisdiction within the “Political subdivision.” To the bestof Claimant’s inquiry, neither the Political subdivision nor the Secretary of State for the state of Arkansas have affidavit on file as required to validate offices under contract for local police,assistant prosecutors, or magistrates. When the State of Arkansas rescinded from original jurisdiction to ratification of the 14
th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, all civil service employment was/is considered as “at will employment”. The Citizensof the “Political subdivision” of the “State” are paying for service to members of a collective bargaining unit who lack the contractual obligation of Oath of Office and Constitutional standingof 14
th
Amendment “immunity and privilege”.Claimant has determined by inquiry with the State of Arkansas Insurance Commissioner andfinally with the Arkansas State Bar Association that neither the Judges nor the offending attorney(prosecuting) have bonds on file. This constitutes them, each and severally, as having enteredcommerce without “insurance.” As a concerned American Citizen I made every effort to stop thisextortion to the best of my ability; however, they issue the orders to those with a “third grade bully mentality carrying badges and guns,” which equates to Piracy on the Inland Waterways(roads), or at the least, the act of “Privateering.” I, therefore, request that you expediently utilizeyour authority on behalf of one of “We The People” and investigate this situation, post haste.The result of this fraud has allowed the administrative courts to unlawfully expand the 6
th
Amendment venue and jurisdiction defined by the Oath of Offices of the courts, police andassistant prosecutors of the “Political subdivision”, to now include the “STATE OF ARKANSASas Plaintiff” as a matter of statutory State Policy. Where the original Nature and Cause jurisdiction of the administrative courts lay with city ordinances and moving violation, theSTATE OF ARKANSAS as Plaintiff now makes claims on property and federal benefits for alleged violations of national security,
20CFR404.465 Conviction for subversive activities
 
.These fraudulent claims made in the name of THE STATE OF not only subvert the
Right toprivate property 
it also is a means to deny the ’Right” of appeal that would expose thisunlawful activity.Only recently have ‘enemy combatants’ been recognized as having “Rights.” However, Claimantis NOT an “enemy combatant” nor an “enemy of the State,” according to documents delivered toSecretary of State, Condoleezza Rice’s Office, Chief of Protocol, approximately two years agoestablishing that Claimant is NOT an Enemy of the State, contrary to all U.S. citizens under Title
 
50.Without standing of immunity or privilege and without Obligation of contract to those Citizensof the Political subdivision who possess Original Jurisdiction,
We the People
have UnalienableRights to make Lawful claim of injury and remedy for claim of ‘Rebellion and Insurrection”against the unlawful abuse of our Home Rule local Government, the Political subdivision, by defacto state officers. These are
war crimes and crimes against humanity
in the name of a
 
fictitious Plaintiff 
, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and/or the COUNTY OF BOONE , by defacto State agencies and “local” courts. To Claimant’s investigation, neither the police, theassistant prosecutors, the magistrates of the Instant Issue, or the offending Attorney at Law, havea Bond on record as an insurance for/upon entering the Realm of Commerce as a “for profit”enterprise and Claimant has not been able to establish, as fact, that either, or both, have an Oathof Office. This unlawful use of a statutory administrative court of limited jurisdiction, has causeddamage on a nation wide scale and failed to validate the Nature and Cause of actions created byde facto officers of that court, with Injury and Damages in particular to this Claimant.
Re: 1. 23 CFR 1327. 3 US Coast Guard Law Enforcement (US Department of Transportation).2.
Highway Safety Act of 1966 
3.
The NDR Act of 1982 
4.
 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
5.
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION PARTICIPATION IN STATE HIGHWAY SAFETYPROGRAMS.
PART 1206 -- RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INVOKING SANCTIONS UNDER THEHIGHWAY SAFETY ACT OF 19661206.1 Scope
This part establishes procedures governing determinations to invoke the sanctions applicable toany State that does not comply with the highway safety program requirements in the HighwaySafety Act of 1966, as amended (23 U.S.C. 402).
TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART II > CHAPTER 47 > SUBCHAPTER X > Sec. 877.Sec. 877. -
Art. 77. Principals
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 >
§ 2§ 2. Principals1.
THE STATE OF ARKANSAS
as Plaintiff 
 
2. The State of 
Arkansas
(or, their “minions”) as “State” defined collecting Federalassistance, Highway funds, “Political subdivision” grants,
TITLE 18 Sec. 10. -Interstate commerceTITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART II > CHAPTER 47 > SUBCHAPTER X >Sec. 878.
Sec. 878. Art. 78 Accessory
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1
> § 3§ 3. Accessory after the fact
1.
The collective bargaining unit known as STATE OF ARKANSAS has exhibited failureof all offices, elected, appointed or de facto to have a lawful Oath of office and insurance for a

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
1 thousand reads
jacklamp liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
Nemesisandsam liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->