• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 
ISSUE No. 6: November 2006
 
Welcome to the November edition of Testing Times.The REACH chemicals legislation is entering its final stages in a fraught confrontation between theParliament, Council and Commission. The Plenaryvote in Parliament has been put back to the week beginning 11
th
December as the trialogue underwaybetween the three parties continues to exposedifferences. Although the main concerns arecentred around the substitution of the most dangerous chemicals, animal testing issues are alsobeing closely debated. The lives of many millions of animals will be decided by the outcome of thistrialogue and therefore it is imperative that officialsensure all amendments contributing to a reductionin animal testing are taken up.The ECEAE Annual General Meeting took place inOctober in Helsinki, continuing the tradition of  following the Presidency of the European Union. Helsinki will also be the home of the EuropeanChemicals Agency due to open next year. A highlysuccessful meeting produced a number of excitinginitiatives and lively discussion ensured astimulating time was had by all. I hope you enjoy this edition of Testing Times. If  you have any questions regarding laboratoryanimal issues in the EU, please feel free to contact me.Warm regards,Sandra Hannen, European Policy Director, ECEAE 
This Issue
 
REACH update
The Environment Committee of the EuropeanParliament voted on the Second Reading of theREACH legislation on October 10
th
.The result was reasonably positive as far as animalissues were concerned, with some strongamendments passed. Those that passed include:
 
The publication of test proposals for 90 days sothat interested parties and ECVAM (theEuropean Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods) can suggest alternativesand check whether there is already dataavailable
 
The setting up of a Committee for Alternativesto Animal Experimentation in the new EuropeanChemicals Agency to ensure that a strongalternatives ethic permeates the Agency’s work 
 
The publishing of information about alternativeson the Agency website and making lists of alternatives available to companies.However, other amendments that would havesignificantly reduced the numbers and suffering of animals failed, including:
 
Companies being unable to register if they donot share data (with one incongruous exception)
 
Having the Agency examine test proposalsinvolving animals for chemicals imported in the1-100 tonnage ranges
 
 
The acceptance of equivalent data submissionsfor tests that have taken place in other OECDcountries.
 
Part of the registration fee being used for thepromotion of alternatives
 
Many of the specific test changes in the annexesdesigned to reduce animal use.There was also a partial exemption granted forcosmetics substances. The trialogue currentlyunderway between the Parliament, Council andCommission is discussing the amendments relatingto animal testing (along with many others) and it iscrucial that the fate of millions of animals do not getsacrificed in the jockeying for position. We arecalling on all sides to ensure this does not happenThe Parliament Second Reading Plenary Vote isnow scheduled for the week beginning the 11
th
 December.
Nafovanny Undercover Investigation
The BUAV, a coalition member of the ECEAE, hasfound shocking evidence of the factory farming andwild-capture of monkeys for the internationalresearch industry. The investigation has reportedfrom inside the world’s largest breeding centre forprimates – Nafovanny in Vietnam. The companyboasts that it has capacity for over 30,000 primatesat its two main farms, and is looking to expandfurther.Nafovanny exports macaque monkeys for researchacross the world, and the UK Government for oneclaims that supply centres such as Nafovanny areclosely monitored and abide by internationalguidelines. However the report and video reveals acatalogue of broken standards and terribleconditions at Nafovanny, repeatedly in breach of the bare minimum standards for housing andhusbandry laid out by the InternationalPrimatological Society’s (IPS)
 InternationalGuidelines for the Acquisition, Care and Breedingof Nonhuman Primates
.The findings of the investigation include:
 
Newborn primates kept in small barren cagesthat fail to provide any sort of naturalsurroundings
 
Decrepit cages with little attempt at enrichment
 
Cages that are old with rusted or broken metalwork 
 
Infant monkeys weaned far earlier than the IPSguidelines recommend.
Primates packed in barren cages at Nafovanny.
It is not an exaggeration to describe Nafovanny aslittle more than a factory farm for primates,dedicated to producing as many monkeys aspossible as efficiently as possible – hardlysurprising, commented an independent primateexpert, given that the farm “is designed with thequantity of output given priority over individualcare and welfare”.The investigation also serves as a timely reminderof the continuing impact of captive breeding uponwild populations. Alarmingly, our independentexpert believed that the primates at a satellitesupply farm that keeps Nafovanny fully stockedappeared to be wild-caught – an impressionbolstered by the farm’s location near an area wheremacaques are indigenous, and the lack of a singlepregnant female in what is ostensibly a breedingfarm. We are therefore deeply concerned about theenforcement of policy restrictions on the use of wild caught primates.The ECEAE calls on Governments to both revokeNafovanny’s approval to import in countries whereit is given and ban the importation of primates fromany country where there is an indigenouspopulation – this latter to ensure that no primate isever taken from the wild in the name of research.Ultimately, however, we believe that the only wayto stop these intelligent and sensitive animalssuffering is to ban all experiments on primates. Thereport makes clear that farms such as Nafovanny
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...