Times Chennai E-PaperJuly 22, 2009Page 3
Chennai, July 22:
TheMadras High Court hasmade it clear that DowryProhibition Officers(DPOs) should ensure fullcompliance with the rule inthe Tamil Nadu DowryProhibition Rules whichmakes it mandatory ontheir part to conductsurprise checks anddiscreet enquiries and takeappropriate action.A Division Benchcomprising Chief Justice HL Gokhale and Justice DMurugesan whiledisposing of a writ petitionsaid it was commonknowledge that allinstances of dowryharassment may not cometo light and in such cases,discreet enquiries shouldbe conducted to find outthe truth. Whenever, theDPO came across suchinstances, they shouldtake necessary action.The petitionersubmitted that whiledealing with informationabout matrimonialdisputes arising fromdowry offences, thecurrent practice in TamilNadu was that all theaccused were arrestedwithout preliminaryinvestigation and withoutany attempt to bringrapprochement ofparties. Procedural rightthat safeguarded a partyin litigation was a naturalhuman right. Deprivationor denial of the right wasdestruction of justicesystem.The petitionwas filed to ensure thatthe provisions of DowryProhibition Act and therules were implemented.It sought a direction to theTamil Nadu Governmentto enforce theperformance of DPOswith independentcharges to them asdirected by the SupremeCourt in a case, toattempt reconciliationand conductinvestigation under therules.Thegovernment informed thecourt that DPOs hadbeen appointed in alldistricts. Upon receivingspecific complaints, theyproceeded to takenecessary action ascontemplated under therules.
DPOs should follow DowryProhibition Rules strictly: HC
Chennai, July 22 :
Threepeople, including a four-year-old boy, werecharred to death and fiveothers injured in a firewhich gutted about 50huts at J J Nagar insuburbanKorukkupetarea inNorthChennailate lastnight.Policesourcessaid a shortcircuit wassaid to bethe reasonfor the fire, which tookplace around midnight.A majority ofpeople, living in hutments,were fast asleep when thefire broke out killing Mary(26), Sanjay (four) andAnandan (50) on the spot.Five others, whosustained burns, wereadmitted to KilpaukMedical College Hospital.More than half adozen fire tenders andmetro water tanker battledhard to bring the fire undercontrol. ChennnaiCorporation Mayor visitedthe spot and met the fireaccident victims today
3 killed, 5 injured in fire mishap
Chennai, July 22:
TheMadras High Court hasgranted an interim stay onan order of the SecondAdditional District Munsif atCoimbatore as confirmedby the PrincipalSubordinate Judge,Coimbatore, in a caserelating to provident fundcontributions from NEPCAirlines and two sisterconcerns, NEPC Textilesand NEPC Tea Garden.Justice S Palanivelugranted interim stay andordered notice on anappeal filed by theEmployees Provident FundOrganisation (EPFO).In its complaintbefore the Sub-Judge,Coimbatore, the companysubmitted that providentfund contributions hadbeen effected in respect ofits employees with theEPFO. The airline divisionof NEPC Airlines hadsuspended its operation.Meanwhile, itcame to learn that as pera Central governmentnotification of March2001, provident fund wasapplicable to aircraftestablishments andairlines other than aircraftand airlines owned orcontrolled by theCentral andState governments alsowith effect from April one,2001. The companiessubmitted that the EPFOcould not recover anyamount from them priorto that date.In view of thenotification, theorganisation was notentitled to retain theemployer’s contributionin respect of theemployees of the airlinecompany on anygrounds.But the EPFOwas attempting torecover the alleged duesof Rs 90 lakh asemployer’s andemployees’ contributionfrom the other twoconcerns withoutrefunding the PFcontribution to the airlinecompany.The prayer wasto restrain the EPFO fromrecovering Rs 90 lakhfrom the two concerns.On an appeal by theEPFO, the PrincipalSubordinate Judgeconfirmed the lowercourt’s order.Challengingthis, the provident fundauthorities preferred anappeal, filed by counsel SVaidyanathan, before theHigh Court.
HC grants interim stay
Chennai July 22:
Rejecting the oppositionview that the bill forregulating collection offees by private schoolsshould be referred to aselect committee of theAssembly, the DMKgovernment on Tuesdaygot the law passedthrough voice vote, butpromised to amend itfrom time to time, ifnecessary.When the TamilNadu Schools (FeeRegulation) Bill, 2009was taken up forconsideration, allies aswell as the oppositionexpressed doubt that thelegislation could bemisused and argued thatthere was a need forcertain amendments inthe draft bill to ensureproper implementation.Initiating the debate onthe bill, Congress whipPeter Alphonse said aroad laid with goodintention should not leadto hell. The committee todetermine the fee inprivate schools, asenvisaged in the bill,would have a retired highcourt judge as chairman,but otherwise it would bepacked with bureaucrats,with no academician orschool managementrepresentative. Theabsence of stakeholderscould result in misuse ofpowers, heapprehended. Thedistrict committeesvested with powers toinspect any school hadno teachers orparentteacherassociation members, hesaid, highlighting thepossibility of politicisingthe provisions to actagainst minorityinstitutions by futuregovernments as judicialpowers have beenvested with thecommittees.Former schooleducation minister C VShanmugam pointed outthat both the inquiringofficers and thepunishing authority werethe same, and this couldlead to complications. Aclause in the bill hadwatered down the penalprovisions by granting the judiciary the right to reducethe term of imprisonment tobelow three years. Asaccording to the bill, thoseconvicted for havingcontravened the provisionsof the Act, would bepunishable withimprisonment for a term notless than three years andextending up to sevenyears, the loophole in thebill had to be rectified, hesaid.PMK floor leaderGK Mani asked thegovernment to place the billbefore the public for debateand consult academiciansto improve on it. Admittingthat a law to send shiversdown the spines of schoolmanagements that fleecedparents was the need of thehour, he urged the Speakerto refer it to a selectcommittee to make it fool-proof. CPM, CPI andMDMK all urged thegovernment to forward thebill to the select committee.In reply, school educationminister ThangamThennarasu said thegovernment was very clearin its objective of enacting atough law to end extortionin the name of fee inschools. As the SupremeCourt has ruled in a casethat fee structures shouldfixed by a committeeheaded by a retired highcourt judge in privateeducational institutions, hewas confident of regulatingfee in private schools, hesaid.As thegovernment wanted tosend a strong and clearmessage to privateschools, the minister askedthe members to pass thebill and not delay it.Changes, if necessary,could be incorporated atthe time of making rules tooperationalise the bill’sprovisions, he appealed.The House passed asmany as 31 bills by voicevote.
Tamil Nadu Schools (Fee Regulation)Bill, 2009 passed
Chennai July 22:
TheClass of ’84 of MadrasChristian College willrevisit the college nextmonth to participate inthe batch’s silver jubileereunion, keeping up atradition begun in August2006 by the Class of ’81.Around 150 alumni of thebatch had beencontacted and wereexpected to visit thecollege on August 14. Toregister for the eventcontact Edwin on 9444170048 or the Alumni andPublic Relations Officerat 22397731/ apro@mcc.edu.in, apress release said.
MCC Class of ’84to revisit college
Chennai, July 22:
Chennai CorporationCouncil, which met today,witnessed unruly sceneswith members of the PMKand DMK screaming andthrowing water bottles ateach over the issue relatedto alleged grabbing of landbelonging to theThirumangaleeswararTemple at Koyambedu. .During a call attentionmotion at the meeting, PMKfloor leader Jayaramanraised the land- grabbingissue by saying that aprivate company hadobtained permission fromthe Chennai MetropolitanDevelopment Authority(CMDA) to build a complexon 42.31 acres onJawaharlal Nehru Salai atKoyambedu.The HinduReligious and CharitableEndowmentsDepartment contendedthat a portion of the land,measuring 3.03 acres,belonged to the temple.At that juncture,a drinking water bottlewas seen flying from theDMK Councillors’ row,which created a ruckusand PMK Councillorsrose from their seats towalk out. Later, the PMKmembers raised theissue, which led toheated argumentsbetween Jayaraman(PMK) and Floor leadersSaidai P Ravi and NRamalingam.Intervening,Corporation Mayor MSubramanaian said thaton the basis of a CMDA’splan permit, theCorporation had givenapproval for the buildingwork.He also saidthat on perusal of theapplication for buildingpermit, the earlier ownerof the land had sold 1.26acres to the CentralPublic WorksDepartment many yearsago but the applicationmentioned only theremaining 1.77 acres,which was disputed.‘When theCMDA gave its approval,it had stipulated thatthere should be noconstruction work on thedisputed land’, he said,adding that the approvalwas based on theguidelines of the SecondMaster Plan.The Mayor alsorecalled StateInformation Minister andCMDA chairman ParuthiIlamvazhuthi’s speech inthe Assembly recentlythat as mentioned in theSupreme Court order, theconstruction could betaken up on thoseportions of land otherthan the disputed portion.
Chaos at Corporation council meeting
To advertise inthis paper mail to:
adsales@timeschennai.com
Add a Comment