.US Depmen of Jusice
Execuve Oce r Imaon RevewDecison of te Bod of gaon AppealFas Chch,
Fle A 678 -S Frcisco, CA
e V V RMOVL ROCEGS APPEL
RESPET: Jes eli, EsuirePICATIN el of removDate:
OCT 4 2013
The repodet, a ative d citze of Tld, h ppealed om the o udge's decisio dated May 29, 201, to the extet that e ao Judge denied e plicatio fr efeal o removal he record ll be emded to e ation udge.e Bord reves migratio Judge's dings f ct, icludi nngs to he crebilty of testimoy, der e "clely eoeous sd.8 CF.
Matter of S-H-,
23 I&N Dec. 462, 46465
2002). The Bod revies questios of law, discretion, d judet d all oer issues i eas om decsios of atio Judes de ovo. 8 CR
2 &N Dec. 493
2008)he sodent, o was cnvcted in the Uited Staes
a conole substc violato,s beg prosecuted d imprsoned n Thd based o her past crmn tiviy he reondent, o pea, gues tat ·e Imigatio Judge required te resodet to meet coect bren of o e respondent also argues that the migation Judge d not coser revt evnce d reevt cas law of e te Stes Co of Appeals r ei Ccut.We do not conclude that the maio uge required e respodent to meet coect d f proo Seccaly, e rodent ares that, we e Immiration udge stated at a shog of a"cle pobbil of tore reuired, he was exceedg e eue std of"more kely no. The relevt eerl regulaton sttes that the burden of poofis on e applct to estalsh tt it is "more liey th ot at he or she woul be toured if roved8 CFR.
120816(c)() he regulati does ot use the te "cle probability However, e "ore lke t dd "cear ai' s av un equvaent
467 .S 407, 2
Ts e miaion uge di not reuire the resonent o mt coec en of poo Te reoet as gues at the aion udge did not consider reevt evidece d relevt cae la The aon Judge's decisio oes ot reect that he considered he submssion y oraphog Leksuch, Esque (Exh.
See ole v. Holder
659 F 762
Cite as: V-V, AXXX XX3 678 (BIA Oct. 4, 2013)