Professional Documents
Culture Documents
uctiion Users
The survey was administered in Fall 2008 by SRC. SRC Sampling
ery cclasss)
as in
Socratic Dialog Inducing Labs 16.3 Thi ki g Problems
Thinking P bl 1.1
1 1
multiple times
e/disscusss
or
was done
d att three
th types
typ off institutions:
i tit ti 1)) two
t year
y colleges,
ll g ,
uss idea
e
ps (mulltiple
e (fo
al
uestionss
Class orr
ptua
mess every
oting
nal Leccture
Thi ki g P
Thinking Problems
bl 15 1
15.1 Workbook for Introductory Physics 09
0.9
ass))
concep
mes eve
n alll tessts))
2) four year colleges that offer a physics bachelor
bachelor’ss degree
t 5
t 5
P r Instru
W ole cclass vo
veryy cla
S dentts diiscu
olve
E ry C
ptual qu
U s 4 of the
U s 3 of the
nts
nts
nts
e tim
everry classs)
qualitative/c
S dentts so
small grroup
m (m
nearrly Ever
e tim
nen
nen
nen
as the highest physics degree,
degree and 3) four year colleges that TABLE 2: Ranking of the 24 RBIS according to level of Knowledge TABLE 3: Ranking of the 24 RBIS according to level of Knowledge
U s alll 5
used on
mpon
mpon
mpon
T dition
multiple
All Peer
timess ev
blem
multiple
C cep
(
(percentage
t off faculty
f lt whoh indicate
i di t that
th t they
th currently
tl use the
th RBIS).
RBIS)
classs)
offer
ff a ggraduate
d t ddegree g in i physics.
phy i SRC staff t ff randomly
d ly (
(percentage
t off faculty
f lt whoh indicate
i di t that
th t they
th are currentt users,
Uses
Uses
Uses
Conc
Stud
Stud
Who
com
com
com
Trad
prob
(m
(u
m
A
q
p
e
c
c
selected institutions within each of the three types types. Once former users,
users or knowledgeable nonusers of the RBIS).
RBIS)
1. I used it basicallyy as
16 9%
16.9% 53 1%
53.1% 28 1%
28.1% 25 0%
25.0% 50 0%
50.0% 68 8% 6.3%
68.8% 6 3% 18.8%
18 8% 18.8%
18 8%
selected, SRC staff asked department chairs to identify Knowledge Use
described by developer
f lty who
faculty h were lik likely
ly tto meett th
the selection
l ti criteria
it i ffor th
the 2. I made some
2
relativelyy minor 35.9 47.8 33.3 30.4 40.6 69.6 7.2 14.5 14.5
survey Faculty were eligible for the survey if they had taught
survey. modifications
3. I used some of the
an introductory quantitative course in the last two years and ideas, but made
significant
i ifi t modifications
difi ti
41.0 62.0 24.1 27.8 36.7 63.3 6.3 15.2 13.9
Table 1 shows the number of institutions and faculty in the All Peer Instruction
Users
100.0 54.9 27.2 26.7 37.9 63.6 6.2 14.9 13.8