Table of ContentsPgKey policy alternatives1-6
Key alternative policy outcomes that PANCAP should be aiming at
Key issues that will inform a policy opposing decriminalization1.
Is the Judeo-Christian position tantamount to being “homophobic”?
Doesn’t the initial medical evidence contradict PANCAP’s position?
Is there additional medical evidence?
How can we claim that homosexuality needs entire medical brigades to justify its existence?
Was the Judeo-Christian or “common sense” position arrived at by whim and fancy?
From Playboy to Pedophilia: How Adult Sexual Liberation leads to Children’s sexual Exploitation
What resources can be used to bring citizens up to speed in a short period of time?
Is the deliberate avoidance of alternative policy prescriptions a valid position for PANCAP?
Deeper, more intense violence that the disorder homosexuality generates in its own community
The new craze: legalizing extant crimes … is PANCAP aware of the legal implications?
Is PANCAP being manipulated into supporting a 15-year gay-rights plan broadcast in 1993?
The legal issues summarized in one page: PART I … HIV/AIDS used in larger deception
The legal issues summarized in one page: PART II … The “right to privacy” delusion!
The legal issues summarized: PART III … Justice Scalia’s dissent at Lawrence v. Texas
Why does PANCAP feel obligated to support gay-militant terror-tactics and madness?
The end of it all: Proposition 8 and gay militant terrorism PART I
The end of it all: Proposition 8 and gay militant terrorism PART II
The end of it all: Proposition 8 and gay militant terrorism PART III
The end of it all: The tyranny of the Courts PART I
The end of it all: The tyranny of the Courts PART II … the death of the democratic process?
End notes: How does Canada define “terror” relative to its “protection” of homosexuality?
End Notes II: What the Bible says in a few words is invariably supported by secular scholarship!