“The LoyaltyExpo was a wellrun conerencewith many greatpresentationsand signifcantnetworkingopportunitieswith clients,partners andprospects.”
—Bob Fetter, Pluris
LOYALTY EXPO 2009
S
here’s he hng abu lyaly—’s whaeverhe ndvdual shpper/cnsumer wans be,n a markeer’s prgram. one persn s lyaldue persnalzed servce, anher lkes he ne reeaer en purchases deal, whle smene else wans accumulae pns, ec. the prblem seems be haa leas sme markeers are mre n lve wh punggeher prgrams and seng rules han hey are nreally cnnecng wh her cusmers.
Citibank and American Airlines have a program, orexample, where one can earn 20,000 Aadvantage® milesor doing the ollowing: Open a checking account with atleast $1,000 by 6-30-09. Make one direct deposit or paytwo electronic bills or make ve qualiying non PIN-basedpurchase transactions with their debit card per month ortwelve consecutive months. Oh, and you have to rememberto register or the program using a special code and once it’sall over it takes up to 120 days rom completing all the activityto receive the miles.Meanwhile, speaker ater speaker at this week’s LoyaltyExpo advised marketers to “simpliy”, “connect with consumers” and “keep it real”. With the above example, we can see whythat advice is necessary. BrandMIND noted that householdshave an average o 14 loyalty cards yet a Colloquy presentersaid that only 6.2 o those 14 memberships are active. Inother words, consumers have a lot o loyalty cards andcan’t keep up with them all. Yet, here’s the program thatstarted it all in 1981 making consumers jump through nearlyimpossible hoops to claim their award.For the 80 million 12 to 31 year olds classied as Millenials,programs like the above example make even less sense.Panelists at a session on “Building Engagement withMillenials” said that this group is very connected with riendsand amily, relying heavily on word-o-mouth or everything.Millennials want instant gratication—they preer instantcash back (who doesn’t) versus mileage rewards that take along time to accumulate. Traditional media with this groupis less eective, and they have the ability to opt-out o everything, so marketers need to nd reasons to keep themengaged with their brands. I a brand doesn’t deliver, theycan tarnish it pretty quickly, via social networks and W-O-M.Panelists elt that marketers should take away complexitybecause, although this group can scan inormation morerapidly than previous generations, they are better at“scanning” than really reading in-depth.My overall impression is that consumers, i let to their owndevices, would really preer to just have better prices thanwade through piles o special oers and loyalty program rules.(Can anyone say Wal-Mart or Southwest Airlines?) But, sincethere can be only one low price leader or any given type o business, everybody else needs to think about what else willwork best and perhaps try the ollowing tips:
• Keep loyalty programs
and special oers simple enoughthat harried consumers can gure them out easily andquickly.
• Don’t try to
trick consumers with onerous rules andregulations—you’ll get trashed via social media.
• Personalize ofers enough
so that shoppers will know youare on the same page with them, but not so much thatthey think you are snooping on them or trying to be their“riend”.
• Think about what
you oer rom the perspective o consumers who are going through tough times moreoten than not, and are continuously bombarded by“deals” rom marketers o all sizes and stripes.
L
July 2009
| Loyalty Management
61
Leave a Comment