Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Roberto Ceja-Ruiz, A200 558 702 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)

Roberto Ceja-Ruiz, A200 558 702 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 310 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for consideration of the respondent’s request for a continuance while USCIS considered his request for U nonimmigrant status. The Board noted that evidence was submitted on appeal indicating that a law enforcement agency issued the required certification for the respondent’s sister, and that the respondent may claim eligibility as a derivative of an application filed by his mother. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for consideration of the respondent’s request for a continuance while USCIS considered his request for U nonimmigrant status. The Board noted that evidence was submitted on appeal indicating that a law enforcement agency issued the required certification for the respondent’s sister, and that the respondent may claim eligibility as a derivative of an application filed by his mother. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Oct 18, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/25/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Buon, Jstin R., Esq
S Depatmen  Jsie
Executive Oce r Imgation Revew
Bd Immigi AlO   Clk
5107 Leburg Pik, Sut 000Fal Chrc. Vrgna 204
Krezelman Buo
&
Assocates, LLC200 West Adams Street, Suite 2211Chcago, I 60606OHSE ice of e ouse CI525 Wes Van Buren StreetChcago, L 60607Name: CEJARUIZ, RBERTA 200-558702Date of ts noce 9/ 26/203
Enclosed s a copy of the Boad's decsio ad ode n the above-eenced case.Eclosue
P MbG Edwd 
Sceey,
D
u
c
Dona Car Chef Cerk
 k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Roberto Ceja-Ruiz, A200 558 702 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)
 
,
. 
U. Department
of
Jusice
Execuve Oce r,lmigation ReewDecson of he Boad of Iaon AppeaFa
hurc
Vga
2204 I
File 00 558 702 -Chcagon re ROBERTO EARIZ ak.a. Robeto  Ceja 
REMV OCEEDNGSAPLDaeN BHALF OF RSPNDEN: Jusn R Brton EsquireO BEHALF OF SPLCI oninceGeoy  GipinAssisant hef ounsel
SEP
2
6 13
The espondent a natie and ctzen of Mexco appeals om the ecsion o e mmigraionJdge, aed December 21, 201 dening his equest  a connuance while e pusuesnonimmia stts under the rovisons o secon 10(a)(5)( of the Immgaon an Nationality Ac 8 USC. § 0(a(5(U), ere nited Staes itienship and ImmigrationSerices (USCS) ad orering s remoal om his coun. e recod will be rende tote Igaion dgeWe reew migaton udges' ndings of ct  clear eo u uestions f aw,dscreton and udgent, and a ohe ssues in appes de novo. 8 CFR. § 003(d)(3Under the cicmstnces esene n his cse, we concude ha t s appropriate o emandte recod o te mgaon dge  the poceedngs n ore to prove the respondent with a renewe opportniy o request at hese eo oceengs be contned wie SCISconsiers hs eues r  nonimmiant satus
See Mater of Sanchez Sosa
25 I&N Dec 80B
)
Specical on appeal he eonent 
h
resened evidence that er terespondens las eing bee he mmigaion udge a aw enorcemen agenc eecued a onimmig Sas eicaion (Fo 98 Suleen B) on behaf o e esondenssise, inicatng ta both te resondens sse ad othe provided satements o e poice.The responen has aso esene  eceip noce o SCS r e aplication led by ismoher an e esponden assets hat e ma clam eligibily as a dervative o s applicaionWe epress no opinon egardng the uiae outcome o tese removal oceedings a e present ie and e note ha the resonent es he bden o deonsaing "good cause ra connce o ee eoa poceeg
CFR
§ 9, 4
e e noe ha while in cean cicumsces a coninance o reoal poceegs ay be waante wheean alien s seeing a  vsa o SS,  continunce soud no be ge whee i is beingsougt "as a ilaor acic  esal e concsion of remoal proceeings
Maer ofanhe oa pra
a 815 B 202.ccoringl he llowing order
l
eenere
t"
:

WE
Cite as: Roberto Ceja-Ruiz, A200 558 702 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)
 
A2b0
558
702 
ER: he ecod s emnded to the mmtion out  he oceedngsconssent 

e egong o4on nd r the
en
o  new decson
�
BA
Cite as: Roberto Ceja-Ruiz, A200 558 702 (BIA Sept. 26, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->