• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
RECOPMNDATION
OF
THE
REGIONAL
 ADMINISTRATOR 
(EGION
)
CONC€F#lING
THE
S
 WEEDENS
 
NkP
SITE
IN
AWFEO,
MaUmS
WM
TO
SECTION
W(c)
OF 
ME
aEPN
WATER
ACT
 
CONTENTS
IV.
IntroductionBackground
A.
Project Description and History
B.
LitigationDescriptionof Site
A.
EcologicalValues
B.
SoilsandHydrologyAdverse Effects
from
Proposed Project
A.
Wildlife Habitat
B.
Water
QualityAlternatives
to
the Proposed Project
A.
.
General Considerations
B.
Practicable Alternatives
C.
Less Environmentally Damaging Alternatives
D.
ConclusionMitigation
A.
Scientific Issues
B.
Legal and Policy Issues
C.
Pyramid's Proposed Mitigation
Re
comme
nda
t
ionAppendix
A:
Month
-
by
-
Month Chronology of Project HistoryAppendix
B:
Habitat EvaluationAppendix C: August 21, 1985 Proposed DeterminationAppendix
D:
Response
to
Comments
 
I.
INTRODUCTIONThisrecommendeddecisionconcernsa50
-
acrewetlandinAttleboro, MassachusettsknownlocallyasSweedensSwamp,wherethe
Newport
GalleriaGroup,anaffiliateoThePyramidCompanies,(Pyramid) proposes
to
buildanenclosedregionalshoppingmall.Largelya forestedwetlandadjacent
to
aheadwatertributaryotheSeven
Mile
River,theswamp
is
locatednext
to
Interstate95,roughly
-.
one
-
quarter
mile
from
theRhodeIslandborder.Inorder
to
con-
'?
struct
themallandappurtenantfacilities,Pyramidproposes
to
fill32acresowetland.Pyramidwouldexcavateanother13acres oexistingwetlandand9
acres
ouplandinanattempt
to
mitigatetheadverseimpactsothemallonflooding,waterqualityand wildlife.
As
additional
mi
tigation,Pyramidproposestoexcavate andregrade30acresouplandand
acresoopenwaterseveral
miles
from the
site
inanattempt
to
createemergentmarsh,open water,andshrubwetlands. Section
404(c)
otheCleanWater
Act
(CWA,
33U.S.C.
S1251
et
seq.
)
,
authorizestheAdministratorotheEnvironmental
~roEction
Agency
(EPA)
to
prohibitor
restrict
theuse
of 
anydefinedareaas adisposal
site,
wheneverhedetermines,afternoticeandopportunity forpublichearing,thatthedischargeodredged
or
fillmaterialsintosucharea
will
haveanunacceptableadverseeffectonmunicipal watersupplies,shellfishbedsandfisheryareas
(
includingspawningandbreedingareas),wildlife,
or
recreationalareas.Beforemakingsuchadetermination,theAdministratormustconsultwith theChief otheArmyCorpsoEngineers,theproperty
owner(s),
andthe
applicant(s)
incaseswhere
ther-e
hasbeenapplicationfor aSection404permit.
EPA's
regulationsimplementingSection
404(c),
40
C.F.R.
Part231,establish procedures
to
befollowedinexercisingtheAdministrator's authority
to
prohibit
or
restrict
theuseoanarea
as
adisposal
site.
ThethreemajorstepsintheprocessaretheRegionalAdmin
-
istrator'sproposeddecision
to
prohibit
orrestrict
theuseoa
site;
theRegionalAdministrator'srecommendation
to
theAdminis
-
trator
to
prohibit
or
restrict
useothe
site;
andtheAdministra
-
tor's
finaldecision
to
affirm,modify,
or
rescindtheregionalrecommendation.TheAdministratorhasdelegatedtheauthority
to
makeafinaldecisionunderSection
404(c)
to
theAssistantAdmin
-
istratorforExternalAffairs,who
is
EPA's
nationalSection404programmanager.This proposed shopping mall has been controversial and attractedwidespread public opposition and support.
I
have carefully con
-
sidered the record developed by EPA and the Corps in this case,including the many public comments submitted, information presentedat public hearings, voluminous submissions by the proponent, andthe comments of other federal and state agencies.
As
described
more
fully below,
I
have determined that the discharge of fillmaterial into Sweedens Swamp as proposed by Pyramid would be likely
to
have an unacceptable adverse effect upon wildlife habitat.Therefore
I
recommend that use of the area as a disposal
site
forthe purpose of building a shopping mall be prohibited.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...