Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Maria Lilian Lopez-Ferrera, A206 005 069 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)

Maria Lilian Lopez-Ferrera, A206 005 069 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 241 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) sustained a DHS appeal and found the immigration judge erred in terminating proceedings because the signature on the Notice to Appear (NTA) was not legible. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) sustained a DHS appeal and found the immigration judge erred in terminating proceedings because the signature on the Notice to Appear (NTA) was not legible. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Oct 23, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/06/2013

pdf

text

original

 
LOPEZ FERRRA,MRIA LILAN A206-005-069HUTTOCCA100 WECH ST. POB 1063TAYLOR
TX
76574
US pm of Jusi
Executive Ofce r Immigation Reiew
Board ofImigtion AppealsOce o the Cek
5107 Leeburg Pik, Ste Fa Chh Vgna 24
HS/ICE Office of Chie Counsel -NA890 ourwinds Drive 5th FooSan nonio TX 78239Name: LOPEZ FERRERA, MRIA LILIANA 206-005-069Dae  inoice9/27 /2013
cosed is a copy of he Boar's ecs on an oer n te aboe-eece case.ncosre
Pl Mb:Gran, Edwad R.
=
Sieely,
D
c
t
Dona Car Cef erk
scl
1·,ar
:/\
: Dcket
-
&.W-
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Maria Lilian Lopez-Ferrera, A206 005 069 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)
 
.US Deparent of Justice
Desn f he Bd of mgrao Appeals
 ·
Exective Oe r Imaon ReewFas Chuh,
Virgnia
204
FileA206 05 069 -S Antonio, TXIn re  LIIN LOPEZEERA MOVA PRCEDGAPEAON BEHF OF EPONEN Pro seN BALF OF H: Jo C. WiggewoAssistan Cef Conselate:he eparent of omeand Secy (e "S) ha appealed an Immigraion JudgeAugut 8, 203 decion. e Immiration Judge deteied tat there was no way to ideni[e] isuing ocer ne on e Notice to Appear (Fo 862), d tenated erespondent's remova proceedin wiout preudce. e DH' appeal wil be ustained. eImmiaion Judge's decision will be vacated Remova proceedings wi be reinstated, and therecord of proceedings wil e reded to e Immigration Cou r er proceedinW rview nding of ct, including e determination of credibily, under a clearlyoneous sdd 8 C.F.R.
§
1003.(d)(3)() We review quetion oflaw, ncludng weer  he paie hae met the relevant buden of proof, ad isue of dicretion under
de novo
standard. 8 C.FR.
§
003.(d)(3)(ii). The respondent's case arises aer May 11, 2005, ands therere goveed by te provision of e AL ID c
 See Maer ofS-B-,
24 &N ec. 42(BIA 2006).We digree wi the Imgraion Judge's concluion that e Noice o Appear (Fo I-862) nucient because e isuing ocer' nae coud not be identied The Notice to Appear (o I862) n s case conains an illeible signaure aong wth he pined tile "SuperioryAsylum Ocer• Howeer, i conn a signae and itle
 See
8 CF.R.
§
239 (a)(5)(upersory Ayu Ofcer my sue a Noce o ppea)The Imgrton and Naonali Ac ad e regulation do not requre tat  mmgration ocias natre e legile on a Notice o Appe (Form -862)
 See
secion 239 of emgron and Nationaliy ct, 8 U.SC.
§
1229; 8 C.FR
§§
239(), 1003.(c)
Kohi v.Gonzales
 47 .3d 106, 06-68 (9t Cir. 2007) (ilegiliy of sinare d te of e suing ocer on e Notice o ppe dd no deprive Imigraion Cor of urisdcon) en f eydid, an oision of y of he enraed ies, whch mus e ncluded shal ot e consedas ordng e ien any ubstve or procedura rigts.
 See
8 C.FR.
§
00(c Thus, e Noce To Apper (orm -862) i not defective here i no eidence tha he Noice ToAppea w mpropery issued.
Cite as: Maria Lilian Lopez-Ferrera, A206 005 069 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)
 
L
A206 005 069
Een  e tce t Ape (Fm 
-
8
62
)
as ece te atn   regutn 
does
nt necesay naa
a
rema prceeng
 See atter of Hernande,
2
1
& ec 224 226BA 
9
96
)
ther, hs B has csenty he ht e atn f  reguyequrement ntes  prceedg ny wher he regun prdes a eet t the aen 
d 
 e  prejudced e terest  the aen hws  e reced y e reguatn
 Seeatter of arca-Fores,
17
&N Dec 325 BA
980) Hwever the
respnet has t emnsed
t 
 e regun pres a enet 
 to
her r ha she
 was
prejce  heSes Asym Ofcers lege sature  e Ntce t Aper F 862)
 Seeatter of Santos
9
&N ec
0, 109
(BIA 984)Accrngy, the wng rers w e entereOERThe DHSs ppe s
susained and 
 te Immgat ges decs s acatedFURHER OER Rem prceegs
re einse
 the recr s remde t e
m

a
 t
 n
 r 
fe
 rceengs2
z;= "
Cite as: Maria Lilian Lopez-Ferrera, A206 005 069 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->