Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Upinderjit Singh, A048 029 730 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)

Upinderjit Singh, A048 029 730 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 376|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), following an unopposed remand from the Fourth Circuit, remanded for further consideration of its determination in Matter of U. Singh, 25 I&N Dec. 670 (BIA 2012), that a conviction for stalking in violation of Cal. Penal Code 646.9(a) is categorically an aggravated felony crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 16(b). The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Hugh Mullane and Member John Guendelsberger.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), following an unopposed remand from the Fourth Circuit, remanded for further consideration of its determination in Matter of U. Singh, 25 I&N Dec. 670 (BIA 2012), that a conviction for stalking in violation of Cal. Penal Code 646.9(a) is categorically an aggravated felony crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 16(b). The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Hugh Mullane and Member John Guendelsberger.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Oct 23, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/05/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Jobe Robe B., Esq. Law Oice of Robe B. Jobe 550 Kearny Street Suite 200 San Francisco CA 94108 Name: SINGH UPINDERJIT
U.S Dprtnt of Justc
Executive Oce r Imigraton Rvew
Bod of Iigo Als Oc of h Ck
5107 Lebug P;k Suite 2000 Fals Chc, Vgn 2204
HS/ICE Oice o Che Cousel -WAS 500 12th St. SW, Mail Stop 5902 Washingto DC 20536  08-029-730 Date o this otice 9/27 /2013
closed is a copy of the Boad's decisio ad order i the above-rereced ase. losur
P Mb:
Mulane, Hgh G. Guedelsbeger Jo Puey, Roge
Siceely,
D
c
l
Doa Carr Cief lerk
wilame :
Docket
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Upinderjit Singh, A048 029 730 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)
 
 '
r
US.
Departmen
of �ustice
.
Exe 
utve Oce r
m
 
tion
Revew
)
Fas Chrch,
Vir
g
ia
22041
 Fi: A048 029 3 nton VA In  UPERJIT SGH I EMOVL PROCEEDGS APPEAL
Deion of e Board o I
 
gao Appeal
Dat: ON BEHALF F SPODNT: Rob B Jo, Esqir ON BEHALF O DHS: Ad L Brg Assstant Chif Couns CHARGE:  otic: c 12(a)(2)(A)()(), &N Act [ 8 C
§
8(a)(2)(A)(i)()] Cm inoing mora uide APPLICATION: Wai of nadmissbii dr sction 1(h) of th Act Ths cas is b s nstant rsuant to a rand om t Unitd Stats Cou of Aas  h o Ccit  on Ju
5,
01 Th cas was e us intia on Janua 19, 202, whn w uphd a b  201, Immigraton udge dcison nding  rsondent rmoab as chagd, but acatd  Immigation dg's dcsion gnting the sondnt a wair of inadmssb undr scton (h) of  Act
5 I&N c 60 (BA 20) Th rsondnt s a nati ad citizn ofnda T Immgration Jdg rantd th  sondnt's wai a concudng at h cod not nd t rsondnts staing coniction r scion 66(b) of  Caia Pna Cod o b a
crme
of onc caus  was not bound b o dcson to  cona n
Mter of Mata,
3 I& Dc 656 (BIA 00),
h Unit Stats Cort of Aas r  Nin Circuit had rrsd  dcision in
Mlt-Espinoza
v.
Goaes,
48 F3d 080, 1083-84 (9th Ci 200) In ou ubishd dcison,
Mate of
Singh, supra
w rachd wo ma concsions: ( 1) a dcson
by
a dra co of aas rsng a cdnt dcison of th Board s not bnng auho outsid t crct in whch h cas
ses,
an ) a staing ons  arassing conduct in oation of sction 6469() o t Caia Pna Cod
s
a cim of onc
under
scton 01(a)(43)(F) of  Immigaton d Nationa Act, 8 U.SC
§
10(a)(43)(F). W aso ointd ot that bcaus  rsondnt
at ba was reovable f having oied a ime
inoing moa id, t was his burdn to show
at
his conicton was not
agavated
fon
See
 8 CR
§
1240(d) As a sut, w od h Imaon Jdgs
grt
of a wai of nadmssiiit und sction (h) of  Ac d orrd t rsondent roed to is nat Inia Th ma s now  us owing a Jun 25, 02, oosd motion to rmd b  Fo Ccut rusting  rcord b rd to th Boad r  ocdings. cca, e ou Ccut
emanded

ecod
r r rocdngs in igt o
ts
dcison
Cite as: Upinderjit Singh, A048 029 730 (BIA Sept. 27, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->