A. True Ott, Phd, ND485 W. 3925 N.Pleasant View, Utah 84414(801) 392-1635Petitioner in pro perUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF UTAHOGDEN DIVISIONDr A. True Ott, PhD, ND (Et. Al.) Case No.:Petitioner,)) PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR ) INJUNCTIVE) AND DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DAMAGES) FOR INTENT TO CAUSE BODILY HARM)) [Civ. Code 527.8]United States Department of )Health and Human Services, ) Judge ___________PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DAMAGESPetitioner brings this action pursuant to Civ. Code 527.8, for wrongful intentto cause bodily harm, against Respondent, United States Department of Health andHuman Services, and in particular, for intending to administer mandatory “swineflu” vaccinations for all American citizens, in violation of the First Amendmentto the United States Constitution.RELIEF SOUGHTPetitioner seeks an order to enjoin respondent from administering mandatory“swine flu” vaccines.JURISDICTIONJurisdiction is conferred upon this court pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331,which authorizes original jurisdiction on the district court of all civil actionsarising under the Constitution, laws and treaties of the United States.Jurisdiction is also conferred upon this court pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. §1343(c)(4), which grants jurisdiction to the district court of any action torecover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congressproviding for the protection of civil rights.Jurisdiction also exists pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1367(a), whichauthorizes jurisdiction over state law claims that one so related to the otherclaims in this lawsuit that they form part of the same case and controversy.VENUEVenue is proper pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(e), which authorizes thata civil action may be brought in a judicial district in which a substantial partof the vents or commissions gives rise to a civil rights claim.PARTIESPetitioner, Dr A. True Ott, Phd, ND on behalf of himself and US citizens andresidents in Utah, is a natural person, and is, and at all times mentioned hereinwas, a resident of Weber County, Pleasant View, Utah. The agency recordsdescribed herein are situation in Weber County, Ogden, Utah.Respondent, United States Department of Health and Human Services, (hereindescribed as “respondent agency”), is, and at all times mentioned herein was, apublic health agency of the United States federal government.FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Petitioner, Dr A. True Ott, Phd, ND on behalf of himself and US citizens andresidents in Utah, has personal knowledge that Respondent has a well-formed planto act in a manner that will surely cause Petitioner serious bodily harm. HHSSecretary Sebelius, has made public statements, online reports of planning formandatory vaccination of all citizens and residents of the USA, with plans for 600million doses to be given in a two shot program.4. The planned act complained of is to administer mandatory “swine flu” vaccinesfor all Americans in the fall of 2009 pursuant to clauses in the Model StateHealth Emergency Powers Act, PD51, and sections of Homeland Security, PatriotActs, and John Warner Defense Act, SPP 2005 Agreements between USA President Bush,Mexican President Vincente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Harper.5. The threatened bodily harm is irreversible serious injury or death.CATEGORIES OF PROBABLE AND POTENTIAL IMMUNOTOXIC INJURY& DEATH:1. PROBABLE ACUTE OR CHRONIC ADJUVANT TOXIN INDUCED NEUROLOGICAL , e.g. MF59INCLUDING SQUALENE OILS PROVEN TO INDUCE ADJUVANT LUPUS, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TYPEAND OTHER AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES. INDUCTION OF CHRONIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES,VASCULITIS, NEUROPATHY, CELLULAR AND ANTIBODY MEDIATED END ORGAN DAMAGE ANDPOSSIBLE DEATH ARE WELL KNOW TO BE CAUSED BY TOXIC ADJUVANTS. NEW PROPOSEDADJUVANTS INCLUDE MF59, HEAVY METALS ALUMINUM, MERCURY, PLAMIDS OF RNA OR DNA OFRABIES VIRUS, DRUGS SUCH AS METFORMIN, ETC. TO BE REVIEWED AT DISCOVERY WITHVACCINE MANUFACTURERS FOR HHS.2. POTENTIALLY HOT BATCHES WITH CONTAMINANT STEALTH PATHOGENS, E.G. MYCOPLASMA,VIRUSES, FUNGI AND ACUTE OR CHRONIC ILLNESS, PLAMIDS CONTAINING RNA AND DNAFRAGMENTS AND GENE CASSETTES.3. DANGERS OF USE OF RNA AND DNA PLASMA ANTIGENIC AMPLIFICATION IN NEW TESTVACCINES CAN EPIGENETICALLY SWITCH ON GENES CAUSING SERIOUS IMMEDIATE HEALTHDANGERS, ACUTE AND CHRONIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES AND CANCER CELL TRANSFORMATIONONCOGENETIC INDUCTION4. PROBABLE FASTER A H1N1 VIRAL GENETIC RECOMBINANT SUBSTRAIN CLADES GENERATION,WITH POTENTIALLY HIGHER CASE INFECTIVITY AND CASE FATALITY RATES WITH THE USE OFNEWER RNA VACCINATION TECHNOLOGIES5. VACCINATION INDUCED DEPRESSION OF IMMUNE PROTECTION AGAINST PRIMARY INFLUENZAINFECTION AND GREATER CASE FREQUENCY AND MORE SERIOUS CASE MOBIDITY AND HIGHER AH1N1 CASE FATALITIES

6. The threat is imminent because of clauses in the Model State EmergencyPowers Act and statements made by Respondent, HSS Secretary Sebelius and USPresident Obama. Planned vaccination programs are poised to start as soon ascontracted vaccine manufacturers have stocks available to HHS in early as August2009 to October 2009. HHS has announced that schools, first line health andpolicy and military will be the first to be vaccinated. HHS will be operating asa proxy for US transfer of Pandemic Preparedness and Medical Martial Law under theco-ordination of the WHO, as Pandemic Level 6 has been already declared prior tofiling this petition for injunction.7. An action for money damages alone is insufficient to restore petition tohis status quo ante after the threatened harm because irreversible serious injuryor death cannot be remedied financially. Medical research, scientific andtechnical experts, and prior case reports will be provided at Discovery.8. The threatened harm to Petitioner, Dr A. True Ott, PhD, ND on behalf ofhimself and US citizens and residents in Utah, outweighs any substantial harm tothe Respondent because to mandate “swine flu” vaccinations will cause irreversibleinjury or death to Petitioner, whereas to not mandate “swine flu” vaccinationswill cause no physical harm to Respondent, or the US population from thePetitioner prevention of mandatory A H1N1 vaccination.9. There is no substantial public interest that will be contravened by thisHonorable Court issuing an injunction favoring this particular Petitioner. HHSproposes that A H1N1 vaccination program protection of the general public from acompletely novel rapidly changing virus, makes this program of no benefit andgreater danger to the public.10. Similar mandatory US Federal HHS, Ford Administration mandatory SwineVaccination caused the death of between 30 to 60 citizens, and Guillaine-Barreascending paralysis in over 500 US citizens, and other major and delayedautoimmune disorders. Legal settlement of a US Class Action suit was successfulagainst the US Federal Swine Flu Vaccine Program 1976 of the Ford AdministrationHHS.11. There is a substantial likelihood that Petitioner will prevail in thisaction, because the facts obtained in the record by discovery will reveal thatRespondent has knowingly conspired to mandate a “swine flu” vaccine program on theAmerican public in fall 2009. Discovery of vaccine suppliers, medical experts,researches and published literature, will prevail in proof of toxic adjuvants,dangerous RNA and DNA technologies, contaminated batches with viruses,mycobacteria, and stealth pathogens, and lack of efficacy of the vaccinatedprocedure for public protection against primary influenza infection or preventionof acute or chronic complications.12. There is a substantial likelihood that petitioner will prevail in thisaction, because the facts obtained in the record by discovery will reveal that thevaccines proposed for mandatory administration by Respondent contain untested ortoxic contaminants.13. The United States Department of Health and Human Services is a publichealth agency of the United States federal government.14. A temporary injunction is necessary to protect Petitioner and US Citizens andResidents of Utah from the threatened harm.REQUEST FOR HONORABLE COURT TO PROVIDE AN INJUNCTIVE ORDERWHEREFORE, Petitioner moves this Honorable Court to enter an ordering enjoining